![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Gamebreaker
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 14,602
|
Re: Mark Ingram at #10?
Quote:
So you are going to remotely compare this kid to those 3 I mentioned?...lol Also, I don't feel there is a QB worth a 1st round selection this year. It's bad when Mel Kiper even says he doesn't feel any of these QBs in the draft are "franchise QBs". LOL @ your Cam Newton. If anything, I think I've shown enough material to prove my point about red flags, and this kid has a shit ton of them. I'll say it again, the team that drafts Cam Newton expecting this kid to play in the first 2 years are going to be set back 4-5 years. Let's hope it's not this franchise, we know all too well what having a lame QB can do for your franchise. (shuler, ramsey, campbell, brunell) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: The Fortune Teller
Posts: 2,512
|
Re: Mark Ingram at #10?
Quote:
![]() Guess we watch it play out and see. BTW, I would rather Locker than Newton but we got to get started somewhere... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Gamebreaker
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 14,602
|
Re: Mark Ingram at #10?
Quote:
I think Locker fits our system better than Newton (or any other one for that matter), but I wouldn't value him as a 1st rounder either. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: The Fortune Teller
Posts: 2,512
|
Re: Mark Ingram at #10?
Quote:
As far as the 4 you mentioned, they were good but nothing great and we were bitching back then to. I am still convinced we have what we need to get the job done. +/- a few. Without a good/great QB,RB,WR core, we go nowhere fast. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|