Report claims Redskins won't cut Haynesworth

[Schneed10]

Originally Posted by SirClintonPortis

Essentially, we're handing him a roster spot while someone competing their ass off to make the team doesn't because of Feigner's shit. I have a problem with that.

If we release Haynesworth and he ends up on the Eagles, what would have a bigger impact on us? That 53rd player's contributions to our team, or Haynesworth's production against us in two games?

I don't give a rat's ass about the 53rd player's feelings. I care about how best to win games. The 53rd player will be a non-contributor. Albert will eventually be dominant again.

[Schneed10]

You guys are just wrong on this. There's no other way to say it.

[Alvin Walton]

I give it a couple more weeks and he'll be a Raider or a Raven.

[skinster]

Originally Posted by Schneed10

You guys are just wrong on this. There's no other way to say it.

I love you schneed. A redskins fan, a salary cap guy, a realist, and someone not afraid to speak his mind. We would get along real well

[skinster]

Originally Posted by Alvin Walton

I give it a couple more weeks and he'll be a Raider or a Raven.

Raven? You know they run the 3-4, right?

[MTK]

People are really worried about his 20 snaps a game 2x a year against us??

[skinster]

Originally Posted by Mattyk

People are really worried about his 20 snaps a game 2x a year against us??

Its more of an image and pride thing, for our organization. It makes us look foolish and sheds poor light upon us if Haynesworth is able to dominate us. I think that will affect our locker room, our faith in our management, and our potential future free agents. They might say "haynesworth did great elsewhere, the redskins hold you back."

And yes I don't want to see Haynesworth get his revenge on us.

[NLC1054]

I don't think Albert has a helluva lot left, honestly. But all he has to do is get up and play for two games a season, and we'd be end for a world of "YOU SEE, THE REDSKINS MISHANDLED HIM!" from media and the fanbase a like.

I mean personally, I think Trent could just wave a Big Mac in front of Albert's face and throw it before every snap and Albert would chase after it, essentially taking him out of the game. But I don't know what the teams Big Mac budget is.

[Lotus]

Originally Posted by Mattyk

People are really worried about his 20 snaps a game 2x a year against us??

No, I'm not. But I'm still with Schneed. I'm worried about his possible dominance in 16 games for a division rival.

I say trade him to DT-hungry Denver for anything you can get. Anything. A conditional 7th round pick if need be. Then he's off the team but he's not tearing it up in Philly or for some other close competitor.

[MTK]

Originally Posted by skinster

Its more of an image and pride thing, for our organization. It makes us look foolish and sheds poor light upon us if Haynesworth is able to dominate us. I think that will affect our locker room, our faith in our management, and our potential future free agents. They might say "haynesworth did great elsewhere, the redskins hold you back."

And yes I don't want to see Haynesworth get his revenge on us.

Players go to other teams all the time and play well. I don't see AH going somewhere else and playing well having any sort of huge impact on us at all, at least not how you have described.

Having him on our team already impacts the locker room, faith in management, etc.

[NLC1054]

Originally Posted by Lotus

No, I'm not. But I'm still with Schneed. I'm worried about his possible dominance in 16 games for a division rival.

I say trade him to DT-hungry Denver for anything you can get. Anything. A conditional 7th round pick if need be. Then he's off the team but he's not tearing it up in Philly or for some other close competitor.

I'm all for sending Haynesworth to Denver too. Let him suck wind in the thin Colorado air.

[skinster]

Originally Posted by Mattyk

Players go to other teams all the time and play well. I don't see AH going somewhere else and playing well having any sort of huge impact on us at all, at least not how you have described.

Having him on our team already impacts the locker room, faith in management, etc.

I guess all this disagreeing comes down to is I think Haynesworth will be a dominant force (especially if he is an eagle with washburn as his coach), and you do not think he will be effective enough to embarrass us.

I don't want him on our team, but we can keyshawn his ass and sit him a year and just not have a 53rd player (which looking at our roster, really won't be that big a deal. Or he can buy his way out of the contract by returning 16 mil of the bonus money if he is that unhappy being sat. No distraction has to be made if he is not there.

[NC_Skins]

Originally Posted by SirClintonPortis

Essentially, we're handing him a roster spot while someone competing their ass off to make the team doesn't because of Feigner's shit. I have a problem with that.

A roster spot that won't be used anyway. The full team isn't active on game days so you essentially have guys that are collecting spots on a team that aren't being used. Why not sit his fat ass down and show him and other would be free agents that you aren't coming to DC with this kind of act.

[Schneed10]

Originally Posted by Mattyk

People are really worried about his 20 snaps a game 2x a year against us??

If he gets into a 4-3 with his old defensive line coach, he would be on the field for a lot more than 20 snaps a game because he would actually buy into the defense and would embrace his role.

[Monkeydad]

More on the moron:

Prosecutors could call 10 witnesses in Haynesworth sex abuse trial - Crime Scene - The Washington Post

Prosecutors had offered to dismiss the sexual abuse charge if Haynesworth would plead guilty to simple assault, but Bolden rejected the deal, saying his client was innocent.

Haynesworth was absent at Monday’s hearing, the second time he has not attended hearings in the case. Haynesworth was also absent from a May hearing, although the judge overseeing that hearing agreed with Bolden’s request to waive his client’s appearance.

Haynesworth’s absence Monday seemed to anger Wynn, who chided Bolden for “making assumptions” that it would be permissible for Haynesworth not to be there.

After the hearing, Bolden said he was surprised by the number of witnesses the government plans to call in its case. “They overcharged it and they are now going to over-try it,” he said.