One Last Luck vs RGIII Thread

[NC_Skins]

Originally Posted by redskins5044

Here we go again, we gave up 2 #1 picks not 3.

Tomato, Tomato.

It is, but it isn't.


It actually took 3 first and a 2nd to get that 1st, which was 4 spots ahead.


This reminds me of when the whole CBA thing was going on. The owners liked to say they were getting 60/40 split of the profits, but what they were doing is leaving off the 1 billion off the top so they can show the public how they were being neglected. The NLFPA side of it was that it was basically a 50/50 split (give or take a few percentages) once you add the 1 billion into the equation.

I think this all boils down to how you view the transaction.

[tryfuhl]

Originally Posted by NC_Skins

Tomato, Tomato.

It is, but it isn't.


It actually took 3 first and a 2nd to get that 1st, which was 2 spots ahead.


This reminds me of when the whole CBA thing was going on. The owners liked to say they were getting 60/40 split of the profits, but what they were doing is leaving off the 1 billion off the top so they can show the public how they were being neglected. The NLFPA side of it was that it was basically a 50/50 split (give or take a few percentages) once you add the 1 billion into the equation.

I think this all boils down to how you view the transaction.

4

It was 4 spots ahead.. and in a few years we will know

[NC_Skins]

Originally Posted by tryfuhl

4

It was 4 spots ahead.. and in a few years we will know

Opps. Thanks for the correction.