![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#16 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 4,347
|
Re: SI Ranks Offensive Backfields
SI's ranking are offensive....to anyone with half a clue about the NFL.
__________________
"I would bet.....(if), an angel fairy came down and said, '[You can have anything] in the world you would like to own,' I wouldn't be surprised if you said a football club and particularly the Washington Redskins.'' — Jack Kent Cooke, 1996. |
|
|
|
| Advertisements |
|
|
#17 | |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: SI Ranks Offensive Backfields
Quote:
As for the Redskins anyone who ranks them higher needs to put in the tapes from last season. No sports source is going to put out rankings where the Redskins are ranked higher until they start showing something on the field. So until Campbell learns how to throw a football dont expect for the Redskins to be ranked any higher in any rankings than they are now. Hopefully for Redskins fans sakes across this Country Campbell can step up his game so the Skins can win this year. |
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 362
|
Re: SI Ranks Offensive Backfields
Quote:
You know, SI is just dumb!
__________________
"And the Redskins went down there and manhandled them and they basically undressed them and now everybody's been lining up to get a piece of them." - John Riggins on the last game we played in Texas Stadium |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 4,347
|
Re: SI Ranks Offensive Backfields
Quote:
Considering the first half of 2008 (JC was mentioned as a Pro Bowler & CP led the NFL in rushing) along with the second half, please don't tell me you'd rather have the following in the backfield besides JC & CP: Chad Pennington, Ronnie Brown Flacco, McClain/McGahee Schaub, Slaton Rosenfels, Peterson K. Collins, Chris Johnson S. Hill, Gore Tampa's mess Orton, Moreno Sanchez/Clemens, Jones/Washington
__________________
"I would bet.....(if), an angel fairy came down and said, '[You can have anything] in the world you would like to own,' I wouldn't be surprised if you said a football club and particularly the Washington Redskins.'' — Jack Kent Cooke, 1996. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Another Year, another mess.
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,581
|
Re: SI Ranks Offensive Backfields
Thats funny that the 4th leading rusher, and the 19th leading passer (who by the way is ranked better than Kyle Orton, and only 2 places behind Jay Cutler) is considered by SI the 26th ranked backfield. Whoever wrote that article based it purely on opinion and who their favorite teams are.
__________________
That got ugly fast |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 | |
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kill Devil Hills, N.C.
Posts: 7,570
|
Re: SI Ranks Offensive Backfields
Quote:
__________________
Defense wins championships. Bring it! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Puppy Kicker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Age: 42
Posts: 8,341
|
Re: SI Ranks Offensive Backfields
Chad Pennington, Ronnie Brown -- Absolutely a better combo.
Flacco, McClain/McGahee -- In my opinion, about equal. Schaub, Slaton -- We have the slight edge on them. Rosenfels, Peterson -- Rosenfels isn't good, but AP is the best in the league, so I can see why he's ahead of them. K. Collins, Chris Johnson -- I'd rank them ahead of our guys. S. Hill, Gore - We're better than Hill and Gore. Tampa's mess - We're better than Tampa. Orton, Moreno - Orton is probably better than JC, but MOreno is a total question mark, Id have to put us as better. Sanchez/Clemens, Jones/Washington - We're about even here, having us slightly ahead. Jones led the AFC in rushing last year, but Sanchez/Clemens are too wild cardish. Like Orakpo I don't agree with all the rankings, and could see the skins move up a few spots. But I can't argue with a lot of the rankings. That said, a lot of mention of offensive lines in the article. If we're factoring in O-lines, I feel like the list makes more sense.
__________________
Best. Player. Available. |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: round the way
Age: 42
Posts: 2,211
|
Re: SI Ranks Offensive Backfields
DALLASSSS #3?????
........well theres proof of them being AMERICAS FAVORITE Team. marion barber is good, but defintely not THAT good. and romo is...........well he's romo. MR. HIGHS/lows.
__________________
SOMEBODY PINCH ME |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 58
Posts: 21,702
|
Re: SI Ranks Offensive Backfields
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: SI Ranks Offensive Backfields
I'm sure New England, Indianapolis, and Baltimore love seeing the Giants as the second best backfield in the NFL. Jacobs is probably a top ten back in the NFL, but Ward left, and Eli is clearly the worst QB in their top 5. So, who knows really?
The list gets pretty bad in the second half, so given that, I don't think it matters that the Skins are "below" anyone in particular. No one actually puts thought into the 18th-27th teams on any list anyway. People have better things to do.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: SI Ranks Offensive Backfields
It does seem criminal to put the Falcons at No. 7, and then not even mention Jerious Norwood. Without him, that's not a good offensive backfield.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: SI Ranks Offensive Backfields
And I think he has Jamaal Charles confused with Priest Holmes, and Matt Cassel confused with an established QB.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
|
|
#28 | |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: SI Ranks Offensive Backfields
Quote:
All im saying is I can understand why Campbell/Portis had a low ranking when you look at what happened last year. I would take Campbell/Portis over alot of those players for this upcoming season. I can understand why SI had the Skins ranked so low in these rankings though. |
|
|
|
|
#29 | |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: SI Ranks Offensive Backfields
Quote:
Im banking on Campbell playing better in the 2nd year of Zorns offense, and the fact that hes in a contract year. I just cant say SI screwed the Skins over in these rankings when as of today Campbell/Portis hasnt done anything to suggest they should be ranked higher based on what happened last season when we actually played good teams in the 2nd half. |
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: SI Ranks Offensive Backfields
I think that ignores that Campbell/Portis were essentially responsible for 6 out of our 8 wins. With Collins and Betts in those rolls, we're a 4-12, or maybe 3-13 team. Which, I think, is something that unit rankings have to figure in.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|