The Buttery Males Thread

[skinsfan69]

When will people realize that Snyder isn't going anywhere? He is 100% owner and is here to stay.

This organization is the rock bottom of the NFL. Shitty stadium, shitty training facility, fans that are totally checked out, loser ownership, bad team w/ no QB, constant scandals going on, no team name. Ron must go to bed at night thinking was it worth it taking this job? It truly is the worst head job in the NFL.

[skinsfan69]

Originally Posted by Giantone

Forcing your cheerleading squad to pose topless is pretty close.

They were not forced to do anything they did not want to do. The director was a female. This cheerleader thing was way overblown.

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by skinsfan69

They were not forced to do anything they did not want to do. The director was a female. This cheerleader thing was way overblown.

No, BS!
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/02/s...aders-nfl.html

This article was first published May 2, 2018.

When the Washington Redskins took their cheerleading squad to Costa Rica in 2013 for a calendar photo shoot, the first cause for concern among the cheerleaders came when Redskins officials collected their passports upon arrival at the resort, depriving them of their official identification.

For the photo shoot, at the adults-only Occidental Grand Papagayo resort on Culebra Bay, some of the cheerleaders said they were required to be topless, though the photographs used for the calendar would not show nudity. Others wore nothing but body paint. Given the resort’s secluded setting, such revealing poses would not have been a concern for the women — except that the Redskins had invited spectators.

A contingent of sponsors and FedExField suite holders — all men — were granted up-close access to the photo shoots.

One evening, at the end of a 14-hour day that included posing and dance practices, the squad’s director told nine of the 36 cheerleaders that their work was not done. They had a special assignment for the night. Some of the male sponsors had picked them to be personal escorts at a nightclub.

[BaltimoreSkins]

Originally Posted by skinsfan69

They were not forced to do anything they did not want to do. The director was a female. This cheerleader thing was way overblown.

Have to disagree here. The reports definitely show an unwillingness to participate but fearful of repercussions. I also am not sure what having a female director has anything to do with the scenario anyways.

[irish]

Originally Posted by BaltimoreSkins

Have to disagree here. The reports definitely show an unwillingness to participate but fearful of repercussions. I also am not sure what having a female director has anything to do with the scenario anyways.

Agree. Especially when their passports had been confiscated which eliminated their ability to get out of there.

[FrenchSkin]

Originally Posted by skinsfan69

When will people realize that Snyder isn't going anywhere? He is 100% owner and is here to stay.

This organization is the rock bottom of the NFL. Shitty stadium, shitty training facility, fans that are totally checked out, loser ownership, bad team w/ no QB, constant scandals going on, no team name. Ron must go to bed at night thinking was it worth it taking this job? It truly is the worst head job in the NFL.

Yeah we have to keep in mind the level of support the NFL showed Snyder, when not only allowing him to buy out his minority owners, but going out of its way to lend him part of that money.
If there was anything bad enough to force him out they wouldn't have gone that far. The backfire potential would be way to big.

[skinsfan69]

Originally Posted by Giantone

No, BS!
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/02/s...aders-nfl.html

This article was first published May 2, 2018.

When the Washington Redskins took their cheerleading squad to Costa Rica in 2013 for a calendar photo shoot, the first cause for concern among the cheerleaders came when Redskins officials collected their passports upon arrival at the resort, depriving them of their official identification.

For the photo shoot, at the adults-only Occidental Grand Papagayo resort on Culebra Bay, some of the cheerleaders said they were required to be topless, though the photographs used for the calendar would not show nudity. Others wore nothing but body paint. Given the resort’s secluded setting, such revealing poses would not have been a concern for the women — except that the Redskins had invited spectators.

A contingent of sponsors and FedExField suite holders — all men — were granted up-close access to the photo shoots.

One evening, at the end of a 14-hour day that included posing and dance practices, the squad’s director told nine of the 36 cheerleaders that their work was not done. They had a special assignment for the night. Some of the male sponsors had picked them to be personal escorts at a nightclub.

Your source is the NY Times...lol. Again, no one held a gun to their heads and told them to do what they did. They were adults. Also these were not even their jobs. Cheerleaders are not paid. All they had to do was say no. They choose not to. Not to excuse what the Redskins did, it was 100% out of line - but pretty tired of the cry wolf crap.

[skinsfan69]

Originally Posted by BaltimoreSkins

Have to disagree here. The reports definitely show an unwillingness to participate but fearful of repercussions. I also am not sure what having a female director has anything to do with the scenario anyways.

But what were the repercussions? Loss of a salary? That wasn't it. At the end of the day you are a cheerleader, an unpaid position.

If someone puts a crack pipe in front of you and tells you to smoke it are you going to do it?

[MTK]

[Ruhskins]

Originally Posted by skinsfan69

But what were the repercussions? Loss of a salary? That wasn't it. At the end of the day you are a cheerleader, an unpaid position.

If someone puts a crack pipe in front of you and tells you to smoke it are you going to do it?

Dude, no offense but why are you so hell bent on this? Bunch of cheerleaders were harassed and threatened by this organization. What's the benefit to you as a person to disregard and discount what they went through?

Women put up with a lot of shit, and aren't always in a position to say no. This is an organization that has fired people for sexually harassing women, I'd give them the benefit of the doubt.

[MTK]

Originally Posted by Ruhskins

Dude, no offense but why are you so hell bent on this? Bunch of cheerleaders were harassed and threatened by this organization. What's the benefit to you as a person to disregard and discount what they went through?

Women put up with a lot of shit, and aren't always in a position to say no. This is an organization that has fired people for sexually harassing women, I'd give them the benefit of the doubt.

End of story.

[SunnySide]

Originally Posted by skinsfan69

But what were the repercussions? Loss of a salary? That wasn't it. At the end of the day you are a cheerleader, an unpaid position.

If someone puts a crack pipe in front of you and tells you to smoke it are you going to do it?

The old days of old men exerting their standing and undue influence on young ladies in the workplace is over.

Young interns dont need to "stay silent" when an older boss gets creepy.

Those days are over.

The Jon Gruden and Bruce Allens of the world are being phased out.

[rocnrik]

I’d like to see the almighty Owners good ole boys club get axed like lowly Jon gruden … not gonna happen.. they hide behind the little guys while they get away with crap like Snyder has …I’d like to see see Snyder gone .. truth is the name is gone so might as well wipe the slate clean and start with new ownership..

[skinsfan69]

Originally Posted by Ruhskins

Dude, no offense but why are you so hell bent on this? Bunch of cheerleaders were harassed and threatened by this organization. What's the benefit to you as a person to disregard and discount what they went through?

Women put up with a lot of shit, and aren't always in a position to say no. This is an organization that has fired people for sexually harassing women, I'd give them the benefit of the doubt.

I am not discounting it. As I said it is pretty low. My point is these women didn't act like responsible adults by choosing to take off their shirts. .

[MTK]

What's worse the person taking off their shirt or the person asking for that to happen? Seems like there's an easy answer here as far as who the victim is.