![]() |
|
|
#166 |
|
\m/
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,846
|
Re: There's No Quarterback Controversy
Since you seem to be hung up on the topic of deliveries, what do you think about Colt's sidearm sling?
|
|
|
|
| Advertisements |
|
|
#167 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2,836
|
Re: There's No Quarterback Controversy
Quote:
![]() If you aren't going to come with more than "why not see what the backups can do" (as if benching the franchise quarterback is something to be done on a lark), why not just move onto a new thread? I mean, we get it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#168 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Richmond, Va
Posts: 394
|
Re: There's No Quarterback Controversy
|
|
|
|
|
|
#169 | |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Richmond, Va
Posts: 394
|
Re: There's No Quarterback Controversy
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#170 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Rockville, MD
Posts: 422
|
Re: There's No Quarterback Controversy
The point he is trying to make is we understand what you are trying to say - you've said it about 100 times in this thread.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#171 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Richmond, Va
Posts: 394
|
Re: There's No Quarterback Controversy
|
|
|
|
|
|
#172 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Washington DC
Age: 38
Posts: 16,867
|
Re: There's No Quarterback Controversy
Quote:
You don't like JC as the QB. Okay. We get it. Moving on...
__________________
Establishment, establishment, you always know what's best. I've been a part of this message board for 17 years. Damn I'm old. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#173 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Staunton, VA
Posts: 1,261
|
Re: There's No Quarterback Controversy
Honestly I do not think Campbell has been the issue this year so IMHO there is no QB controversy but I guess you have to have everyone in DC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#174 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 214
|
Re: There's No Quarterback Controversy
Jason seems like a very good person & I hope he can become a great QB but when things go bad the 1st two to take the blame will be him & Zorn. I just hope both can help the Skins make a run the next five weeks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#175 | |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
|
Re: There's No Quarterback Controversy
Quote:
__________________
24-34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#176 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
|
Re: There's No Quarterback Controversy
yeah, in fact i think one could argue JC performs better (at his position, respectively) than say 6 or 7 of the other guys on offense most of the time. Obviously CP, Sellers, and Cooley perform at a high level quite consistently. And while Moss can be spectacular he can also catch the dropsies overnight and somehow fail to get open for long stretches. i say JC is consistently our 4 best player on offense (again respective of position), so yeah we could do a lot to improve elsewhere.
__________________
24-34 |
|
|
|
|
|
#177 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Washington DC
Age: 38
Posts: 16,867
|
Re: There's No Quarterback Controversy
Quote:
__________________
Establishment, establishment, you always know what's best. I've been a part of this message board for 17 years. Damn I'm old. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#178 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
|
Re: There's No Quarterback Controversy
Yeah, Gumby is exactly what I was going for but my memory doesn't work for shit anymore!
Wonder if this nickname will stick... nah
__________________
24-34 |
|
|
|
|
|
#179 | |
|
Most Interesting Man in the World
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Age: 38
Posts: 8,606
|
Re: There's No Quarterback Controversy
Quote:
__________________
Vacancy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#180 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
|
Re: There's No Quarterback Controversy
good points. def before this year samuels would be ahead of JC. ARE is so damn hard to analyze IMO. As, I believe, GTripp explained in a game-review thread El's numbers seem to jive w/ a decent 2nd receiver. But his presence just isn't inspiring out there. Too streaky? Not enough yards after catch? Hard to say...
__________________
24-34 |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|