Stafford in WFT Plans? He’s Available

[MTK]

And they both have killer beards, it's making sense now

[sevier2]

Originally Posted by Meks

hatters gone hat

Lol!

Who’s the poster with all of WarPath’s unique vocab in their sig?

[skinsfaninok]

“Teams have contacted the lions to see what it will take to land Stafford”

Shefty

[PorkSkins]

Originally Posted by chief x_phackter

i'ma get the f out then if go big means giving away more than #19 and #74. You can have a matthew stafford in the building, but if you don't have enough pieces around him, it won't matter.

Just sayin - jimmy g was 5 minutes away from winning the sb last year, because he had a sb caliber cast around him. I'm not suggesting they go get him, but in my opinion, they shouldn't go big at the expense of the rest of the roster.

+100

[PorkSkins]

Originally Posted by skinsfan69

I'd rather take my chances w/ keeping my picks and rolling w/ Allen and Heinike. Pick a Qb within the 1st 3 rounds. I just really really liked what I saw from Heinike. Is everyone just forgetting how well he played under some tough circumstances? How many drops he had? Give him a chance w/ more weapons. He was making throws that we hadn't seen in a while, we was anticipating, moving well.

The more I think about it, the more I'm starting to lean towards your way of thinking. I'm not quite there yet as I'm on the fence, but I'm slightly tilting "your way."

[sdskinsfan2001]

Heinicke is a walking injury. His one consistent is he always gets hurt. There is just no way if I was Rivera I could go into next season with him as the likely starter. Allen isn't good enough in general. Those 2 plus a more proven veteran would be OK imo. But not just those 2.

Note - I think regardless of what we do, we're keeping 3 QBs next year, not including PS.

[rocnrik]

I wish Taylor was the answer ... I just don’t know

[skinsfaninok]

Originally Posted by rocnrik

I wish Taylor was the answer ... I just don’t know

He's not

[MTK]

Honestly how is trading for Stafford even a debate? Just get it done.

[sevier2]

Originally Posted by MTK

Honestly how is trading for Stafford even a debate? Just get it done.

This is where I'm at.

I've seen this team make blockbuster trades/FA signings time and time again for players that weren't of the same caliber as Stafford. We desperately need an upgrade at QB and he still has a LOT to offer at this point in his career.

I know it's a new regime in Washington and they're trying to reset the culture but this seems like a move we have to make. If they were willing to go "all in " on Cooper last off-season they should see do the same here.

[punch it in]

Originally Posted by sdskinsfan2001

Heinicke is a walking injury. His one consistent is he always gets hurt. There is just no way if I was Rivera I could go into next season with him as the likely starter. Allen isn't good enough in general. Those 2 plus a more proven veteran would be OK imo. But not just those 2.



Note - I think regardless of what we do, we're keeping 3 QBs next year, not including PS.

Very very small sample size. Could be a freak thing. I believe he stayed healthy in college. I know he played at a small school but I dont think im ready to call him a Jordan Reed yet.

[SunnySide]

They offered 23M guaranteed to Cooper vs cowboys 60M guar, it was never a real offer. per keim

[punch it in]

So if we trade for Stafford (which would clearly be a win now move) do we draft one of the first round quarterbacks if they fall too us or do we use that on a tackle or wr to compliment Stafford?

[mredskins]

Originally Posted by MTK

Honestly how is trading for Stafford even a debate? Just get it done.

It makes us NFC East Champs for a couple of years, hooray.

[EdmundDorf]

Originally Posted by punch it in

So if we trade for Stafford (which would clearly be a win now move) do we draft one of the first round quarterbacks if they fall too us or do we use that on a tackle or wr to compliment Stafford?

If we trade for Stafford we won't have a first round pick