Post Draft Free agency targets

[MTK]

The team is trending in the right direction. That's all we can ask for and for it to be happening so quickly is a pretty impressive job by Ron and company.

[EARTHQUAKE2689]

Originally Posted by punch it in

Yeah it is nice, but the team was still 7-9. We were obviously extremely fortunate to play in the NFC least, and for Dak to get hurt.
Culture is great, wins are better. To have both would be awesome. We will see.

The Cowboys were literally one onside kick from being 0-4 with Dak, so this notion that Dak is gonna come back and they immediately because a top 3 team in the conference is nonsense to me

[CRedskinsRule]

Originally Posted by EARTHQUAKE2689

The Cowboys were literally one onside kick from being 0-4 with Dak, so this notion that Dak is gonna come back and they immediately because a top 3 team in the conference is nonsense to me

Just to follow up, the head coach of Atlanta, whose team flubbed that onside kick recovery, was Dan Quinn.
The new defensive coordinator of the cowboys, that same Dan Quinn.
The head coach whose defense gave up 31 points and lost Superbowl 51 after leading 28-3, Dan Quinn.


Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

[Chief X_Phackter]

Originally Posted by earthquake2689

the cowboys were literally one onside kick from being 0-4 with dak, so this notion that dak is gonna come back and they immediately because a top 3 team in the conference is nonsense to me

facts!

[skinsnut]

Cutting Moses Morgan is interesting. Yes, they can use the savings on extensions. But to me, it is far to sudden to be explained that way. Is it possible the needed big cap for some sort of heavy need acquisition within days?

[punch it in]

Originally Posted by EARTHQUAKE2689

The Cowboys were literally one onside kick from being 0-4 with Dak, so this notion that Dak is gonna come back and they immediately because a top 3 team in the conference is nonsense to me

I never said they were a top three team in the conference. I said they might have won our division. Those are two completely different things. Lol
I know people are saying that and think it is equally ridiculous btw.

[Pervis_Griffith]

Originally Posted by skinsnut

Cutting Moses Morgan is interesting. Yes, they can use the savings on extensions. But to me, it is far to sudden to be explained that way. Is it possible the needed big cap for some sort of heavy need acquisition within days?

Could be.

Could be other things too.

Maybe MM was becoming less a leader on the O-Line, and more a locker room distraction with all the OT's the team has brought on board recently.

Maybe MM really wanted to test the market for his services, saw Charles and Cosmi and saw the writing on the wall.

Who knows.

This message board was all over MM's poor play two years ago. I'm not crying over this. Wish MM the best, and let's see who of Lucas - Cosmi - Charles winds up winning that staarting spot.

[EARTHQUAKE2689]

Originally Posted by punch it in

I never said they were a top three team in the conference. I said they might have won our division. Those are two completely different things. Lol
I know people are saying that and think it is equally ridiculous btw.

Referring to the people who are saying that

[punch it in]

Originally Posted by EARTHQUAKE2689

Referring to the people who are saying that

Figured just wanted to distance myself from that garbage. Cowboys will underwhelm again like they always do.

[AnonEmouse]

It's water under the bridge, parting with Moses...

Is there a roster and/or cap restriction at this point in the year? Just wondering if this is motivated by clearing space in either/both or it's simply a matter of clearing down unnecessary payroll.

[EdmundDorf]

No they had plenty of space

[Chief X_Phackter]

It's a matter of saving $7.75M, with no cap hit next year. It's a smart move if you think you have someone else on the roster who can step in and perform at the same level (or better). There are several options on the roster with regard to who that guy will be, so we shall see.

[davy]

Originally Posted by AnonEmouse

It's water under the bridge, parting with Moses...

Is there a roster and/or cap restriction at this point in the year? Just wondering if this is motivated by clearing space in either/both or it's simply a matter of clearing down unnecessary payroll.

I see what you did there...

[AnonEmouse]

So glad it wasn't totally wasted

[punch it in]

Originally Posted by AnonEmouse

It's water under the bridge, parting with Moses...



Is there a roster and/or cap restriction at this point in the year? Just wondering if this is motivated by clearing space in either/both or it's simply a matter of clearing down unnecessary payroll.

That’s good stuff.