Any update on Campbell?

Just like someone posted earlier, when Thomas went down, so did the run

It sounds like to me Brunell took your virginity the way you stick up for him all the time, you know your first love can do no wrong. :spank:

I've never had a gay first, second, third, or last love, so I suppose I will take your word for it.

This column is right on.

http://www.washtimes.com/sports/20060117-124142-3163r.htm

This was a great offensive team that had a lot of weapons it wasn't Brunell he could barely execute this offense... Everybody says he did so well.... He had Portis, Cooley, and Moss Plenty of weapons.... But every pass that was over 10 yards to Moss was a brilliant amazing catch by Moss ....all of the TD's were screens or Moss breaking it big.... What about San Diego and the Raiders when Brunell had horrible games... there were many times commentators noted ....that guy was wide open over the middle.... I saw 1 pass over the middle that was thrown deeper than 10 yard by Brunell in the last 8 games that was the Pass to Cooley Saturday......but I also saw many times Cooley was open when they needed 5 yard when Brunell couldn’t get set he had to run back 10 yards... Offiss is right if we had a descent Qb this team had enough talent with the offense to go 12-4 or even better.... Brunell did the best he could..... But that’s not enough....... Everybody said to me at work you don’t seem upset they lost Rail.... and I was but I knew before the Seattle game if we started Brunell the Skin's had a 10% chance at best to win..... You can't beat a good team especially in the playoffs scoring 10 points....... So Do I want old marshmallow armed, Gimp to be gone damn right I do....And Ramsey has proven he can take a shot and throw the ball.... But because brunell throws a great 10 yard pass and was the benefactor of a great defensive team he's god's gift to Qb’s.....read the times article about can brunell get us there....NO F_ckin WAY!!!! Keep Ramsey who knows the offense and Campbell.....

This column is right on.

http://www.washtimes.com/sports/20060117-124142-3163r.htm
This says it all

This was a great offensive team that had a lot of weapons it wasn't Brunell he could barely execute this offense... Everybody says he did so well.... He had Portis, Cooley, and Moss Plenty of weapons.... But every pass that was over 10 yards to Moss was a brilliant amazing catch by Moss ....all of the TD's were screens or Moss breaking it big.... What about San Diego and the Raiders when Brunell had horrible games... there were many times commentators noted ....that guy was wide open over the middle.... I saw 1 pass over the middle that was thrown deeper than 10 yard by Brunell in the last 8 games that was the Pass to Cooley Saturday......but I also saw many times Cooley was open when they needed 5 yard when Brunell couldn’t get set he had to run back 10 yards... Offiss is right if we had a descent Qb this team had enough talent with the offense to go 12-4 or even better.... Brunell did the best he could..... But that’s not enough....... Everybody said to me at work you don’t seem upset they lost Rail.... and I was but I knew before the Seattle game if we started Brunell the Skin's had a 10% chance at best to win..... You can't beat a good team especially in the playoffs scoring 10 points....... So Do I want old marshmallow armed, Gimp to be gone damn right I do....And Ramsey has proven he can take a shot and throw the ball.... But because brunell throws a great 10 yard pass and was the benefactor of a great defensive team he's god's gift to Qb’s.....read the times article about can brunell get us there....NO F_ckin WAY!!!! Keep Ramsey who knows the offense and Campbell.....

You have to judge Brunell by his entire season, not just what you saw in the past three weeks, AFTER he was injured. If doing so, you'd see Brunell is not only a capable quarterback, but the best choice.

Is it really that difficult to throw some credit Brunell's way??

The facts are he had a very solid season and helped get the team into the playoffs with a 10-6 mark.

They way some people make it sound it's as if we won in spite of him and he only made two big plays all year.

If you aren't a fan of Brunell, fine, just admit you are biased and let's move on.

I think the Redskins won despite Brunell... not because of him.

I think the Redskins won despite Brunell... not because of him.


Why's that?

Is it really that difficult to throw some credit Brunell's way??

The facts are he had a very solid season and helped get the team into the playoffs with a 10-6 mark.

They way some people make it sound it's as if we won in spite of him and he only made two big plays all year.

If you aren't a fan of Brunell, fine, just admit you are biased and let's move on.

Exactly!

Could the Redskins do better with a better QB? Of course, but this is who the QB is so move on and forget about what "Ramsey could've" done.

The gimpy, marshmallow arm QB took us to the playoffs, and we should be happy about it. I can't believe we're still complaining about this.