Why We Shouldn't Go Crazy in Free Agency

i was just looking at us getting rw mcquarters who could also fill the need of a decent PR/KR.


Yeah, I was thinking the same thing. But, doesn't he have some lingering injury.

i wasnt sure, but seriosly at the right pryce, im all about getting some people who can fill more than one need, ex. randle-el

CB? I agree we need depth, but you're not saying we should bench Springs or Rogers?

OL? We also need depth there, but you're not saying to bench one of the starters?

We definately need help at DE and WR. I don't think anyone would argue with you and I've never done so. Those are positions of need. Of course we might need help at LB because we just dumped Arrington. But getting 3 new starters wouldn't be going crazy (I've always said that was reasonable and probably to be expected). So, are you just being argumentative for its own sake, or do you actually disagree with what I said?

What I have disagreed with is people who want to upgrade starters everywhere (i.e. TE, LG, WR, SS, DT, DE, OLB). We could improve over the starters at all of those positions, but not all at once and certainly not all at once through free agency.

Taylor's trouble could be come the Redskis if he gose to jail....need a back up plan and that is saying Clark resigns! Three stars like DE,WR and LB would fit the bill!!! Then some vet back ups on the OL and DL.

i read an article saying that we are VERY interested in adam archuleta. hopefully clark can stay AND get archuleta.

i read an article saying that we are VERY interested in adam archuleta. hopefully clark can stay AND get archuleta.

Is this because you don't think Taylor is going to be around or Clark? Lets say we do get Archuleta with Taylor and Clark isn't that over kill? We need Clark or someone at S but we also need a DE and a LB maybe a 3rd CB. The Taylor thing really has me thinking he might not play!!! So if its that I can see a player here but Archuleta will damand to high a cost. There are other free agents that could fill that need at a lower cost I think!!!

i think theyre maybe planning for the possibility of taylor being gone. archuleta would be an upgrade over clark, but that would be a shame to see such a team guy a) get the boot or b) get benched

Bullshit.......Santana was by himself last year....except in the Redzone, where Cooley was by himself....I need a Good #2 Eric Moulds, ..Joe Jurevious, Koren Robinson good back up...TE Dan Campbell....Oh God can we get John Abraham and Tank Williams.....at SS....next to Sean Taylor oh yeah.....and DT Trevor Pryce

that is if tank williams isn't in jail.

that is if tank williams isn't in jail.

what's up with Tank? I didn't know he had legal problems

because a healthy brunell w/ open receivers means
many touchdowns and no interceptions. unhealthy
brunell means jason campbell (unless gibbs goes into
another fit of "i love mark in the in the rain, i love
mark in a train, i would not could not put ramsey in,
i do not like anyone but him") and jason campbell
has had only good things said about him.

i think we're in good shape qb-wise

props on working in some green eggs and ham.

what's up with Tank? I didn't know he had legal problems

damn, sorry, williams just had a DUI, tank JOHNSON (chi) had the legal issues.

my bad.