rooting for Goliath

Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

Huddle
03-27-2006, 03:31 PM
That Guy

please point it out. I see you said its important to spend to the limit after someone else brought it up, but i definately didn't see anything about how talent at starting positions are more important even if it rubs against the price/performance thing a bit.

Did you read my response? How am I supposed to point out something that was omitted (along with dozens of other points less important than the basic strategy)?

As for the spending limit, I made two references to it BEFORE you brought it up as though it had never been discussed.

That Guy
03-27-2006, 05:11 PM
That Guy



Did you read my response? How am I supposed to point out something that was omitted (along with dozens of other points less important than the basic strategy)?

As for the spending limit, I made two references to it BEFORE you brought it up as though it had never been discussed. you don't think its important to max out your starters talent? and if someone else brings it up, they should be shot down for it? please don't start this pointless bickering crap again.

and i never said you didn't bring it up before I said something, but you didn't bring it up before someone else did. You're always on people for twisting your words, so let's not do that.

Huddle
03-27-2006, 05:30 PM
That Guy

you don't think its important to max out your starters talent? and if someone else brings it up, they should be shot down for it? please don't start this pointless bickering crap again.

I "shot you down" for asking me to point out something that I had already told you that I had intentionally omitted. Why can't you simply admit that you mis-read my post? It's not a sin.

and i never said you didn't bring it up before I said something, but you didn't bring it up before someone else did. You're always on people for twisting your words, so let's not do that.

Actually, I DID bring up the spending limit before Schneed mentioned it. In fact, he put the sentence in bold type and quoted me on it. So, you were wrong in your first post on this nitpicky point and wrong again in the one I've quoted here.

gibbsisgod
03-27-2006, 06:05 PM
Spend it danny!!!!:pimp:

gibbsisgod
03-27-2006, 06:16 PM
Every fan in the NFL would want his or her owner to do what Danny is doing. this shit about rooting for goliath is :bs: . every fan does want his team to do whatever it takes to make the TEAM better. Danny does not get outbid for players we want . every fan wishes his owner would or could? do the same.if other owners dont spend the money to get the good players, it shows the fans that they will not do the very most to get the very best talent on their team.every team can do what we do its just that the other owners dont want to spend the cash.

That Guy
03-27-2006, 06:29 PM
That Guy

.

I "shot you down" for asking me to point out something that I had already told you that I had intentionally omitted. Why can't you simply admit that you mis-read my post? It's not a sin.



Actually, I DID bring up the spending limit before Schneed mentioned it. In fact, he put the sentence in bold type and quoted me on it. So, you were wrong in your first post on this nitpicky point and wrong again in the one I've quoted here.

first gtrip is the one that mentioned before you edited your post, so you may think thats nitpicking, but it alsso means you were wrong.

and nowhere is it articulated or mentioned that you intentionally omitted anything, nor was that point stated anywhere else. I'm glad no one is allowed to add anything onto anything you say without having you do this retarded shit on them. I most clearly did not mis read your post and you never said anything regarding that point and for some reason you're acting like i insulted your family.

get a life.

gibbsisgod
03-27-2006, 06:31 PM
:angry-smi first gtrip is the one that mentioned before you edited your post, so you may think thats nitpicking, but it alsso means you were wrong.

and nowhere is it articulated or mentioned that you intentionally omitted anything, nor was that point stated anywhere else. I'm glad no one is allowed to add anything onto anything you say without having you do this retarded shit on them. I most clearly did not mis read your post and you never said anything regarding that point and for some reason you're acting like i insulted your family.

get a life.

That Guy
03-27-2006, 06:35 PM
:angry-smi

yeah, well, i think its ****ing retarded too, but if he's going to start with that point by point bullshit and assume i'm insulting him or that I'm not allowed to post without his permission, he can kiss off.

gibbsisgod
03-27-2006, 06:38 PM
yeah, well, i think its ****ing retarded too, but if he's going to start with that point by point bullshit and assume i'm insulting him or that I'm not allowed to post without his permission, he can kiss off.true, very true

Huddle
03-27-2006, 06:52 PM
Every fan in the NFL would want his or her owner to do what Danny is doing. this shit about rooting for goliath is :bs: . every fan does want his team to do whatever it takes to make the TEAM better. Danny does not get outbid for players we want . every fan wishes his owner would or could? do the same.if other owners dont spend the money to get the good players, it shows the fans that they will not do the very most to get the very best talent on their team.every team can do what we do its just that the other owners dont want to spend the cash.

I think you're over-simplifying.

It's true that fans wants their owners to do their best to field a winner but I suspect you'd get varying opinions if they were asked whether they wanted their team to emulate the Redskins approach.

Right now New England and Pittsburgh would be the models they'd choose I think.

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum