Why in the heck did Synder keep Turner over Casserly? [Archive] - Page 3

redsk1

12-12-2006, 02:13 PM

Beathard came to san diego and ran it into the ground. he was trading first round picks for second round picks:
Charlie Jones
Brian Still
Mikheal Ricks
Terell Fletcher

Mike Shanahan went 8-12 with the raiders then went on to denver to win superbowls.

Belichick was 34-42 with the browns before moving on to new england.

Joe Gibbs made the hall of fame and is struggling in his return.

George Seifert Inherited a superbowl team and won, then went to carolina and sucked ass.

Ownership and current players play a big part of a coaches/GM's success.
as bad as the Turner era was, I felt like the skins could win any game. they always had a decent game plan. Keep in mind, If Matt Turk makes a good snap in the playoff game against tampa, We go on to the championship game against the rams.
I like the Bruce/holt vs Green/Bailey matchup. I think we wouldve gone to the superbowl that year. :(

Btw, I still think spurrier would be a good Head Coach. We are still having the same problems with blocking that we had with spurrier except with spurrier we scored points.

Ownership, Coaches and players all need to play their parts. You can't have success without all the parts coming together.

Totally agree that players make coaches look alot smarter in alot of cases. If we had Drew Brees do you think our record would be 4-9? We might have 8 wins so far. Not that Belichek isn't a great coach but Tom Brady helps a whole lot.

There is a fine line in todays nfl. I thought Norv's team in 1999 was pretty good but we'll never know.


	Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum > Why in the heck did Synder keep Turner over Casserly? Log in Why in the heck did Synder keep Turner over Casserly? Pages : 1 2 [3] skinsfan69 12-12-2006, 09:34 AM Are you sure Casserly wanted Bush? Casserly did have Williams rated really high but he did want to pick Bush. The owner did not want Bush because of the contract demands. Williams was more signable. I believe Mortonson reported it on ESPN. RedskinRat 12-12-2006, 01:08 PM Are you sure Casserly wanted Bush? Don't we all? Giggity-giggity-giggity-goo! There's a lot of plausible deniability in the NFL. You can always claim that "the boss wanted them but I wanted him", who knows the real facts. redsk1 12-12-2006, 02:13 PM Beathard came to san diego and ran it into the ground. he was trading first round picks for second round picks: Charlie Jones Brian Still Mikheal Ricks Terell Fletcher Mike Shanahan went 8-12 with the raiders then went on to denver to win superbowls. Belichick was 34-42 with the browns before moving on to new england. Joe Gibbs made the hall of fame and is struggling in his return. George Seifert Inherited a superbowl team and won, then went to carolina and sucked ass. Ownership and current players play a big part of a coaches/GM's success. as bad as the Turner era was, I felt like the skins could win any game. they always had a decent game plan. Keep in mind, If Matt Turk makes a good snap in the playoff game against tampa, We go on to the championship game against the rams. I like the Bruce/holt vs Green/Bailey matchup. I think we wouldve gone to the superbowl that year. :( Btw, I still think spurrier would be a good Head Coach. We are still having the same problems with blocking that we had with spurrier except with spurrier we scored points. Ownership, Coaches and players all need to play their parts. You can't have success without all the parts coming together. Totally agree that players make coaches look alot smarter in alot of cases. If we had Drew Brees do you think our record would be 4-9? We might have 8 wins so far. Not that Belichek isn't a great coach but Tom Brady helps a whole lot. There is a fine line in todays nfl. I thought Norv's team in 1999 was pretty good but we'll never know.