|  | 
 Pages :
1
2
[3 ]
4
5
6
7
8
9 
 freddyg12 06-16-2009, 08:48 AMKinda piggy backing on this thread, but, what would everyone be willing to give up in trade for Marshall?Denver would certainly want a high price tag to pull the trigger on any deal. And could we afford him?(silly question the way the FO massages the cap, but he would still be high priced I would think)
 
 knew this had to be coming!
 
 IF Danny is dead set on trading for him, I would think they could package Thomas or Kelly & a pick. Denver would ask for at least a 2nd.
 
 If Minnesota gets Farve, or maybe even if they don't, I would think they might make a play for Marshall. Sure hope none of the other nfc east teams gets involved!
 djnemo65 06-16-2009, 08:57 AMknew this had to be coming!
 IF Danny is dead set on trading for him, I would think they could package Thomas or Kelly & a pick. Denver would ask for at least a 2nd.
 
 If Minnesota gets Farve, or maybe even if they don't, I would think they might make a play for Marshall. Sure hope none of the other nfc east teams gets involved!
 
 Thomas, Kelly, and a second for Marshall?  In a heartbeat.  However, as a member of the reality based community I would consider such a move unlikely.
 I definitely would not entertain a trade for Marshall.  We drafted two guys last year and we're still not sure what we have in those two.  Who knows, we could have our own Marshall right under our noses.
 skinsfan69 06-16-2009, 09:02 AMMarshall hands down. Back to back 100+ catch seasons. But to be honest I'd have a hard time rooting for a guy who beats women.
 Paintrain 06-16-2009, 09:11 AMI definitely would not entertain a trade for Marshall.  We drafted two guys last year and we're still not sure what we have in those two.  Who knows, we could have our own Marshall right under our noses.
 I've been saying all offseason that I think Thomas can be a Marshall clone in terms of production.
 
 That being said, an offer of Thomas and a 2nd may be enough to entice Denver.  I'm not advocating it, just saying it'd be feasible for us to make that deal.
 firstdown 06-16-2009, 09:57 AMDB, Vick was one of the most athletic guys in the NFL, but was too inconsistent as a passer to want him on our squad. JC is a better passer than Vick hands down. If we had a real "Posse" for JC he would be hitting the 3,000-3,500 yards passing range every season. Not sure if we could do that with Vick.Funny everytime someone mentions JC's stats it always followed with an "if". If he had a line, If he had better WR's, If the coach would let him take more chances, "if" he had more time in the system. When will he use up all his "if's".
 Let's not go down the JC/Vick/QB road yet again.
 KLHJ2 06-16-2009, 09:59 AMThe only one that has not or is not likely to serve a prison sentence any time soon...I guess.
 CRedskinsRule 06-16-2009, 10:10 AMknew this had to be coming!
 IF Danny is dead set on trading for him, I would think they could package Thomas or Kelly & a pick. Denver would ask for at least a 2nd.
 
 If Minnesota gets Farve, or maybe even if they don't, I would think they might make a play for Marshall. Sure hope none of the other nfc east teams gets involved!
 
 I was not really advocating it, but I was curious what everyone thought.  My curiosity was peaked because we have made it this far without trading any of our top picks next year, and this suddenly pops up.  Now does the FO think about making a trade?
 
 Having said that, we were not really in the market for any other big name receiver that was out there, so I doubt we will be looking that way now.
 
 (I am sure that Marshall would have a career year under SH's tutelage though!!)
 Schneed10 06-16-2009, 10:12 AMMarshall and Plaxico are equals in my eyes in turns of ability, but Marshall will actually play this year.
 Though if choosing between trading for Marshall or signing Plaxico, I'd take signing Plaxico.  I'd rather take a year of an older guy sitting on the bench than trade away a bunch of picks for the younger and more talented Brandon Marshall.  I prefer to keep the picks.
 
 Vick isn't even an option for the vet min, IMO.  The Redskins have enough activists coming after them (Native Americans), we don't need PETA piling on.
 |