Romo gets dissed again.

Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11

roth74va
07-12-2009, 11:21 AM
No not making excuses and call him joke job homo etc. but at least he got them to that point and since moved in that direction that is something Jason has to do before we will ever know. So we will have to see or will we.


If the marvelous "Marty B" can make rap songs calling Romo...a homo, Id say it should be expected to hear the same thing on a REDSKINS message board.

Pocket$ $traight
07-12-2009, 03:52 PM
Jacobs on Romo: "I don't think he's that good a passer" (http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/07/09/jacobs-on-romo-i-dont-think-hes-that-good-a-passer/)

"I'm not a fan of Tony Romo, no. Keep him in the pocket, he's not that good. . . . His luck will be gone sooner or later. If you were to keep Tony Romo in the pocket he's not that effective."

Brandon Jacob's is hilarious because Tony Romo is a STUD! This guy is an idiot, Romo has been a BEAST since he started against NY a few years ago. There is no doubt about it, Romo is a top 10 QB (And is way better than SHELI Manning) And I hate dallas but this is just something dumb to say.
That's like if I said Adrian Peterson is overated lol

I think you are letting the stats skew your view of Romo. From September through November most of what you say is true. I disagree that he is better than Eli. Eli has made huge plays when it counted for a Championship team. All Romo has ever done in December and January is make mistakes that his team could not overcome. You cannot laud a QB whose esophagus tightens up in every crucial game. As far as being a top 10 QB, I could probably name 15 that I would rather in a playoff game at this point in time.

skinsfaninok
07-12-2009, 11:17 PM
" As far as being a top 10 QB, I could probably name 15 that I would rather in a playoff game at this point in time.[/quote] "

Name those 15 my man because I say he is a top 7 QB in the league.

1.Brady
2. Manning
3. Brees
4. Rivers
5. Mcnabb
6. BIG BEN
7. ROMO
8. WARNER
9. E.MANNING
10. CUTLER

CRedskinsRule
07-12-2009, 11:28 PM
Reading this thread makes one wonder if the quote function is REALLY that hard to use!

GMScud
07-12-2009, 11:50 PM
Reading this thread makes one wonder if the quote function is REALLY that hard to use!

No kidding.

Lotus
07-12-2009, 11:57 PM
Reading this thread makes one wonder if the quote function is REALLY that hard to use!

But you have to hit the "quote" button! Please stop making unreasonable demands!

Ruhskins
07-13-2009, 12:02 AM
Reading this thread makes one wonder if the quote function is REALLY that hard to use!

That's what happens when people skip Warpath OTAs. See, they are supposed to be voluntary, but there are some consequences for missing them. LOL.

hooskins
07-13-2009, 01:50 AM
Eli?

Kidding.

Uh, Brady's first SB winning team was pretty run of the mill, and not all that much better in the first round of the playoffs. I think, moreover, there have been plenty of near-miss super bowl stories from not-so-great teams, like Marino, as you mentioned, but also Warner this year, the 2003 Panthers, the 1985 and 1996 Patriots as well.

I guess the Raiders of 1980 would probably be called the "worst" super bowl winner of all time, but Jim Plunkett isn't exactly on the verge of Canton. Anyway, looks like your big picture point holds. Downright sucky teams don't win the SB.

Define good, because they played very well and were coached well. That is a good team. If you are talking talent, sure I agree.

GTripp0012
07-13-2009, 02:05 AM
Define good, because they played very well and were coached well. That is a good team. If you are talking talent, sure I agree.There's probably something to Cowher and Martz getting outcoached in the playoffs there. By run of the mill, I mean "fringe playoff team for most of the regular season."

Of course, you win your division, you get to the playoffs, but I don't think that if it happened a year later (after the divisional reorganization) that they would have had a bye in the playoffs, and without that bye week, there's more or less zero chance of that team coming out of the AFC.

What they started, of course, was the launching pad of more than a couple hall of fame careers, and the very genesis of one of the best 5 year runs in NFL history under Brady, but I think that team was more in the right place at the right time than anything else.

Though I want to extend full credit for playing THE perfect game against the Rams, much like the Giants played THE perfect game against the Pats 6 years later.

sandtrapjack
07-13-2009, 08:19 AM
Did you know that if the Cowboys lose their next playoff game, they will set an NFL record for most consecutive playoff losses at 7?

While I hope that the Cowpatties do not make the playoffs, it will be sweet if/when they set that record for futility.
What you say is true.
But they still are the top team in playoff history at:

Total Wins (32)
Most consecutive seasons in the playoffs (9)
Most games (56)
Most seasons in the playoffs (29)

Gotta take the good with the bad I suppose.

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum