Can We Draft as High as 3rd Overall?

Pages : 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9

redsk1
12-30-2009, 10:16 AM
Yea, there's solid talent in the late first, early second round too. I'll back whatever MS/BA do here. We do have a ton of holes on our team. It's going to take a few years of good drafts.

Landry44
12-30-2009, 10:44 AM
Yea, there's solid talent in the late first, early second round too. I'll back whatever MS/BA do here. We do have a ton of holes on our team. It's going to take a few years of good drafts. I don't view anything we do with that pick as being a bad move. If we draft really high profile player like Clausen, Bradford, or Okung. I wouldn't be upset. I do believe that we should trade down because it's so many super players in this draft more picks will be better for the team. One thing about this organization that needs to change is choosing big names over quality depth. That's why we are in the position we're in today.

BigHairedAristocrat
12-30-2009, 11:44 AM
Yea, there's solid talent in the late first, early second round too. I'll back whatever MS/BA do here. We do have a ton of holes on our team. It's going to take a few years of good drafts.

I agree, which is why i'll be pissed if we "reach" for any specific position. I'm not expecting this team to be successful in 2010. we have a number of needs and we need to pick whatever players fill a need that are valueable at the position we take them. that said, we need to take an OT with a 1st or 2nd round pick and right now, i'm warming up to the idea of taking bradford with our first. If an OT is worthy of being picked with our 2nd rounder, then so be it. If not, we should try to trade down in the 2nd round.

tryfuhl
12-30-2009, 01:41 PM
If we drafted around 5 I wouldn't mind trading down to someone who wants a specific player that was currently around 8-12 and would trade that and a 2nd. Then we trade that 8-12 for a 17-24 and another 2nd or 3rd. We'll be towards the middle to end of the 1st and have 2 extra 2nds (or 1 extra and a 3rd) as well as our own.

I just don't know that there will be two "have to get him" players after 5 or so.

SouperMeister
12-30-2009, 01:53 PM
According to what I've found... our SOS is LOWER than both KC AND TAMPA....

so we'd have the 3rd overall pick.

Redskins Opp Win% - 44%
Chiefs Opp Win% - 51%
Tampa Opp Win% - 54%

Like I said... this COULD be pretty significant regarding trading down or getting Okung....I didn't realize that our SoS was so weak. That makes this season's performance even more abominable.

SBXVII
01-03-2010, 04:41 PM
Maybe I should have put it here.....

Cleveland won to day. something we needed.
Tampa lost today. We needed them to win.

If KC wins does that still move us up atleast one spot? or are we stuck at 5th?

CrackBack
01-03-2010, 04:59 PM
Maybe I should have put it here.....

Cleveland won to day. something we needed.
Tampa lost today. We needed them to win.

If KC wins does that still move us up atleast one spot? or are we stuck at 5th?


If KC wins and we lose, we get the fourth pick.

SBXVII
01-03-2010, 05:19 PM
If KC wins and we lose, we get the fourth pick.

Thank god. Come on KC.

Kelly is looking good. How old is yoder? He seems to find the endzone. .....

Come on Chargers.

Kalisto2010
01-03-2010, 05:23 PM
I can for-see us trading down our pick, and we'll end up picking Bradford, and draft an O-lineman in he second and 3 rounds.

SBXVII
01-03-2010, 09:24 PM
I can for-see us trading down our pick, and we'll end up picking Bradford, and draft an O-lineman in he second and 3 rounds.

I really don't mind if they do this but I just hope that the QB Shanahan wants is available when they are ready to pick them.

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum