Pocket$ $traight
03-16-2010, 12:06 AM
Or a Carter for carriker trade with stl straight up? Maybe a j camp for oj atogwae trade? Cmon smoot give us a lil hint," I got these cheesburgers man!
IMG_0850.JPG
Why would they trade a starting quarterback for a safety? Especially a safety that has no compensation tied to his tender.
Really?
tryfuhl
03-16-2010, 01:34 AM
Hey Smootsmack is this the big secret????? I hope so! Sorry cooley but it's a great move for the team if it's true!
Washington Redskins Could Trade Chris Cooley To New England | Bleacher Report (http://bleacherreport.com/articles/361711-washington-redskins-trading-chris-cooley-to-new-england-patriots)
Anybody can post articles there right? He also posted one about us trading up for Bradford possibly. It's just all speculation "what if" stuff for the most part. Just another Skins fan spouting off hypotheticals.
SirClintonPortis
03-16-2010, 01:42 AM
The Pats raided Robbie Agnone from us last year and he is still on their roster.
The Bleacher Report always has all the secrets
SmootSmack
03-16-2010, 07:23 AM
Haven't heard any mention of Cooley. Not much to add right now, should something be worth discussing I'll bring it up. All I'm saying is with the major free agents all signed the focus will now shift to trading many of the guys we've all spoken about already being shopped by the Redskins-namely Rocky, Kelly, Montgomery, Moss, Campbell
tryfuhl
03-16-2010, 07:39 AM
I think that there's more value in keeping someone like Kelly than you might get in a trade but I'm guessing he'd be part of a bigger package deal. No word on Davis, Thomas, etc being mentioned?
CRedskinsRule
03-16-2010, 07:41 AM
I think that there's more value in keeping someone like Kelly than you might get in a trade, I haven't given up on the kid. No word on Davis being mentioned?
I agree.
BigHairedAristocrat
03-16-2010, 08:54 AM
Haven't heard any mention of Cooley. Not much to add right now, should something be worth discussing I'll bring it up. All I'm saying is with the major free agents all signed the focus will now shift to trading many of the guys we've all spoken about already being shopped by the Redskins-namely Rocky, Kelly, Montgomery, Moss, Campbell
considering the skins have already gotten rid of ARE and we failed to get Dansby or Foote, I would think we would be interested in keeping those two. Moss would seem to be ideal for the slot receiver position. Is the new coaching staff just not high on these guys? And was the absence of Rogers name on that list intentional?
SmootSmack
03-16-2010, 09:15 AM
I think that there's more value in keeping someone like Kelly than you might get in a trade but I'm guessing he'd be part of a bigger package deal. No word on Davis, Thomas, etc being mentioned?
Part of a bigger package. Nothing on Davis, Thomas.
As I understand it, they'd like to keep Rogers. Sure they'll listen to offers but doubt he goes anywhere.
celts32
03-16-2010, 10:07 AM
Trading Rogers doesn't really accomplish anything anyway since it opens a clear hole at CB that they would need to fill with the draft pick they get. Unless they think Barnes is ready to start but that would be way to risky IMO.