wolfeskins
03-30-2010, 05:42 PM
But at the same time he could be as high as second. Most likely third on the list of teams that like him. It's just that some teams won't take Clausen till the second and that isn't likely to happen.
let me clarify, i dont think tebow is first on the list of anyone here on this site. most would prolly want bradford or clauson. but you are correct in what you said.
Son Of Man
03-30-2010, 06:39 PM
Tebow even does wedding engagements, the guy has talent!
YouTube - Tim Tebow Proposes Before the Draft - Mike Rothman (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XMBhiYro3bk&feature=player_embedded)
After watching this and the Philippines missionary video...it's getting real hard to not want this guy on the team. And yes, I think he can play.
GTripp0012
03-30-2010, 06:40 PM
I'd be happy with either; however the "problem" with Okung is that we could probably get a tackle 90% as good 10-20 picks later in the draft. if Suh were on the board, i'd be pretty pissed if we did anything other than drafting him or trading down, since we would have plenty of offers.The only real OT in the draft that I would consider about 90% as good as Okung would be Trent Williams. Anthony Davis, Charles Brown, and Brian Bulaga all come with immediate value, but I would file them in "best of the rest" territory.
I'm higher on Davis than most because I think he's a top three LT in this draft, but I'd obviously feel a lot better about him had Andre Smith been a positive contributor on the 2009 Bengals. I don't necessarily think Smith is a bust nor is Davis any way dependent on Smith to be successful, but as long as teams are going to back their evaluations on these "character issue" types with their dollar, I'd really like to see it pay off for someone first.
I wouldn't be unhappy with any of the above, but ultimately, when you are trying to improve a team, you do that by grabbing the best player you can get who won't be blocked by a veteran. Any situation where we land Okung, it'd be tough to argue that we didn't get the best player available. But going further on down that list, we might then be passing up steals to address an obvious need.
Okung is the offensive Suh in this draft, but there is no Gerald McCoy comparable. The next best offensive player is probably Spiller.
SmootSmack
03-30-2010, 07:48 PM
Spiller!!!!!!! :)
My mock still has us taking Trent Williams
12thMan
03-30-2010, 08:17 PM
Spiller!!!!!!! :)
My mock still has us taking Trent Williams
Do you have him playing left or right tackle?
tryfuhl
03-30-2010, 11:54 PM
After watching this and the Philippines missionary video...it's getting real hard to not want this guy on the team. And yes, I think he can play.
maybe he can go start NFL Philippines or something
Ruhskins
03-31-2010, 12:05 AM
Spiller!!!!!!! :)
My mock still has us taking Trent Williams
I hope your mock turns out to be right. :) I heard somewhere on Twitter that although Okung may be the best prospect, Williams may be the best tackle in 3 years.
hail_2_da_skins
03-31-2010, 09:54 AM
None of the above. If either of these quarterbacks are selected, they will need at least a couple of years to develop. I voted Colt McCoy because I don't think Tebow is a pro quarterback. He would be great for the wildcat offense.
jdc65
04-01-2010, 03:22 PM
I think either QB can excel given the proper system, coaching, and personnel.
mlmdub130
04-02-2010, 12:19 AM
there should be a box for suicide, i would choose that over tebow and mccoy