|
SmootSmack 10-18-2010, 12:15 PM Last night, the Skins made mistakes and blew big opportunities throughout the game. And we were all like damn, not again.
But when the Colts threw interceptions, dropped the football, missed field goals the thinking was "that's not like the Colts at all"
For us to get to the next level, we have to make mistakes the exception not the norm.
I don't know. Haven't we traded enough draft picks for others trash over the years? Lynch isn't any good.
Agreed. Lynch would have made a lot of sense for the Pack, but I don't think we needed to give up picks for him. Better guys can be had next year in the draft for a lot less.
JWsleep 10-18-2010, 12:29 PM We pretty clearly don't yet have all the personnel to play the system the coach's want. That means good drafting and FA pickups are a must. Even without the right personnel, we're not as bad as last year, not by a long shot.
And for all that, we're clearly leaving points, TOs, etc. on the field each game. So that points to execution, which points to practice and comfort in a system, as everyone's been pointing out.
We were a 4-12 team, the oldest in league, with few draft picks. It's gonna take time folks. Thanks, Vinny!
Monkeydad 10-18-2010, 12:33 PM I don't know. Haven't we traded enough draft picks for others trash over the years? Lynch isn't any good.
Forsett outgained him despite getting a smaller workload. Just pointing that out.
Lynch = 17 for 44, TD
Forsett = 10 for 67, TD
http://www.kornheiserscartel.com/uploaded_images/MarshawnLynch-774851.jpg
Longtimefan 10-18-2010, 12:40 PM Torain is going to have to play well for the entire season (and perhaps then some) before I check feature runningback off my list of player needs. Not saying he cant be a good player or hasnt shown some promise thus far but I dont want to crown the kid just yet just like Horton was overly praised a few years ago.
I agree with your assessment on Terain. He's shown flashes and he also has his limitations. (1) demonstrate he can stay reasonably healthy for a season, (2) duplicate his best efforts on a consistent basis so he dosen't slip into that "hero" with accolades one week to he "sucks" the next.
The team needs a lot before it reaches the point where it's considered a legitimate contender on a consistent basis. Our areas of need are well documented, but just how we'll go about acquiring the personell necessary to fulfill those needs remains a mystery. The draft is not exactly a cure all unless we're talking about multiple ones.
skinsnut 10-18-2010, 12:40 PM Talent
aceinthehouse 10-18-2010, 12:55 PM quoted by Skinster
What is necessary for us to be raised to the next level?
We need a bonafide true #1 WR period.
When you don't have that true #1 WR,you allow the defense to play any type of scheme they desire.
A great #1,forces defense to roll their coverage to his side and a Safety over the top. This gives the other players on offense a better chance at making plays.
If they don't have a Safety over the top,you can score on a big play easily. (ie R.Moss,TO,A.Johnson,etc)
Just having Armstrong go deep and making plays has helped us win 2 games...(Eagles & packers alone) And he's really probably a true #3 WR,but playing as our #2.
All teams need to do is shut down Moss and Cooley and they have a good chance at beating us. (Moss still had 8 catches,but didn't hurt them deep...Armstrong didn't hurt them deep and neither did Galloway)
This is why I believe you need a player of V.Jackson's skill or some other player who can get the respect of a true #1 WR. Just him being on the field alone,would allow bigger plays from the other players,such as cooley,moss or armstrong. Not to mention it also helps the running game because the defense is so focused on stopping your #1 WR and you gash them with your running.
Moss is very good,but he's getting old and has probably always been a great #2 wr.
Armstrong is playing great,but will always be that #2 or #3 as well.
We don't have a #1 and we need one,if we're going to be a SB contender.
I'm sorry,but this is just how it is.
If we are not going to go out and get a true #1 wr......then we better go find Brian Westbrook and clone him cause McNabb is going to need someone with that skill set,to offset not having a true #1...Just like when mcnabb was in philly.
Unfortunately,VJ is the only WR that's a true #1 that is available now in a trade.
So we will have to wait till next season. (if there is one)
Until then,you can expect the same dogfight games that go down to the very last play.
Dirtbag59 10-18-2010, 12:58 PM Forsett outgained him despite getting a smaller workload. Just pointing that out.
Lynch = 17 for 44, TD
Forsett = 10 for 67, TD
http://www.kornheiserscartel.com/uploaded_images/MarshawnLynch-774851.jpg
Ehh, it's typically easier for running backs to pick up a system, but it's not one week easy.
SirClintonPortis 10-18-2010, 01:05 PM Don't have time to give a comprehensive list right now, so I'll just point out one thing.
Better fat boys. Both Oline and D line
The same Packers D line that was KILLING us last week was at least being handled decently by the Miami O-line. McNabb is probably hurting big after every game thanks to our o-line still being a sieve at times.
Giving up whatever giant amount of yards to the COLTS is not excusable. Most of our dlinemen are average at best. We need a true NT like Hampton, Ngata. Those guys. Golston IS NOT A 3-4 DE. Hell, he wasn't that great of a 4-3 DT in the first place.
Jontrem 10-18-2010, 01:07 PM After watching last nights game I agree that we need a true #1 to compete with the best of the NFL. V jackson would be nice but probably unrealistic as AJ smith (AKA the lord of no rings!) is vindictive to a fault and wont want to trade him, although Haynesworth and a #4 sound good to anyone??? At this point I think we need to look to next season to get a #1, the list of available free agents is Randy Moss (no thanks!) Sidney Rice (intriguing) Santonio Holmes (low character guy) and Braylon Edwards...everyone else is a #2....
So if we are to draft a WR the best in my opinion is AJ Green out of Georgia but we will hopefully not have a high enough pick to take him!
So then we are looking at either Baldwin from Purdue or Julio Jones from Alabama, I'd rather take Jones.
Either way that's what I see as our biggest need, and sorry to be bringing up draft already!
|