Your 2010 NFL MVP is?

I honestly think all 4 guys deserve it this yr but I'm going to say Vick simply because he has made that team so fun to watch and I like his comeback story. Either way u can't go wrong.. I'm surprised you guys haven't said rivers or Ryan?

I honestly think all 4 guys deserve it this yr but I'm going to say Vick simply because he has made that team so fun to watch and I like his comeback story. Either way u can't go wrong.. I'm surprised you guys haven't said rivers or Ryan?

I think the Rivers hype subsided a tad once he lost to Oakland 2 weeks ago. As for Ryan, I admit he's getting the shaft, the only big difference this year between Ryan, Vick and Brady, is that Vick and Brady are bigger names. Although that will *change* once Ryan continues on his current trajectory.

Brady, probably. Rivers is amazing, but he was much more deserving of the award last year when he was every bit as good as Manning. He's had a bit of a turnover issue that has made a small contribution to the Chargers' losses (not that they need any help).

Vick is a distant third, and while he's a nice candidate, I don't see what he brings to Philadelphia that Jammal Charles doesn't bring to Kansas City or that Arian Foster doesn't bring to Houston. Those would be my top five, anyhow.

It's a really tough call between Brady and Vick. I think Philly still wins games w/out Vick, although they never would've won last week w/out him. Take Brady off of NE and they're probably 500. And like someone else said, Brady is doing it w/ two rookie TE's and average wr's. I'd give a real slight edge to Brady but if Vick has a couple more games like he did last week he might get it. 240 passing yards with a couple throwing and one running, add in the 130 yards rushing...you just don't see that in the NFL...ever.

Brady, probably. Rivers is amazing, but he was much more deserving of the award last year when he was every bit as good as Manning. He's had a bit of a turnover issue that has made a small contribution to the Chargers' losses (not that they need any help).

Vick is a distant third, and while he's a nice candidate, I don't see what he brings to Philadelphia that Jammal Charles doesn't bring to Kansas City or that Arian Foster doesn't bring to Houston. Those would be my top five, anyhow.

Huh??? Well for one he's the QB getting major rushing yards that breaks the back of a defense. Add in his pin point passing and I think you've got a real legit MVP.

This year we're going to get co-mvp's. Brady and Vick are going to split it, just as Peyton and McNair did a few years ago.

good point. we may see that again.

Last game between G-men and Eagles made it more clear for me. Everyone keeps talking about the punter and Desean Jackson, but Vick won the Eagles that game. Vick in a close vote with Brady. Rivers and Ryan are both great this year, but are 3 and 4 in my book.

Brady, probably. Rivers is amazing, but he was much more deserving of the award last year when he was every bit as good as Manning. He's had a bit of a turnover issue that has made a small contribution to the Chargers' losses (not that they need any help).

Vick is a distant third, and while he's a nice candidate, I don't see what he brings to Philadelphia that Jammal Charles doesn't bring to Kansas City or that Arian Foster doesn't bring to Houston. Those would be my top five, anyhow.

Idk about Charles because he splits the carries with Jones so much, in fact I think Jones is the starter on most games (i could be wrong). I'd say McFadden over Charles simply because he's carried that team on almost every Sunday.. The guy is becoming a true Workhorse.

Huh??? Well for one he's the QB getting major rushing yards that breaks the back of a defense. Add in his pin point passing and I think you've got a real legit MVP.And Charles and Foster are the best open field players in the game of football right now.

Vick's having the best year of his career, throwing the football, bar none. He's completing 64% this year, and I'll be the first to admit (or second, after Andy Reid), that I didn't think he had it in him. He's brought big play ability that the same offense couldn't have gotten with Kevin Kolb.

But the same offense would still have been highly productive with Kolb in there. There's no way the Chiefs or Houston have good/great offenses respectively without Charles or Foster, respectively. Houston would still have a passing game to lean on, at least. Kansas City would have five wins, max.

Idk about Charles because he splits the carries with Jones so much, in fact I think Jones is the starter on most games (i could be wrong). I'd say McFadden over Charles simply because he's carried that team on almost every Sunday.. The guy is becoming a true Workhorse.McFadden is another stud this year, no doubt, but his poor games against Kansas City, Pittsburgh, and Miami would hurt him in the MVP race. He's been fantastic for 70% of the season, where as Charles and Foster have been studs the whole season.

I don't think you can possibly hold any of Thomas Jones' struggles against Jamaal Charles, but I will say this: if Kansas City makes the playoffs, their front office, right down to their head coach, have no one to blame but themselves.

After Charles and Foster, then I'd say Peterson, McFadden, and Jones-Drew would be the other players in the running for RB of the year. But Charles and Foster are the MVP candidates. And by MVP candidates, I mean: they'd win the award of they rushed four 500 yards with 700 yards from scrimmage in the last two weeks. Just: still in the race.