Redskins and Vikings agree on McNabb trade (updated: deal is done)

Pages : 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17

GTripp0012
07-26-2011, 06:58 PM
SMoot brought it up in the other thread that he was willing to buy his way out of Washington, so don't see why he'd do that. However, we could **** him just as badly. We could wait till the end of pre-season and then drop him.The insanity of this whole thing is that all McNabb received when he and Fletcher Smith totally gave up his freedom to choose where he finished his career was a $3.5 million signing bonus. I'm not sure I buy the "he's willing to buy his freedom" card. His agent just sold it at a bargain basement price.

SmootSmack
07-26-2011, 07:03 PM
SMoot brought it up in the other thread that he was willing to buy his way out of Washington, so don't see why he'd do that. However, we could **** him just as badly. We could wait till the end of pre-season and then drop him.

Wait I said he was willing to buy his way out?

Anyhow, latest speculation has a conditional 3rd in 2013 coming to us, but I don't know if that's in addition to the 2012 picks, in addition to one of them, or instead of them

NC_Skins
07-26-2011, 07:15 PM
Wait I said he was willing to buy his way out?

Sorry about that SMoot. SOmebody mentioned it, but thought it was you. Cant' find it now. :(

Dirtbag59
07-26-2011, 07:20 PM
Sorry about that SMoot. SOmebody mentioned it, but thought it was you. Cant' find it now. :(

It was in an interview earlier this year.

SmootSmack
07-26-2011, 08:46 PM
For the record, it's not official that he's going to Minnesota. There are other options still in play (namely Miami, but I suppose there are other options as well) Minnesota is the favorite, and would seem to be the place for which he'd be most amenable to restructuring his contract.

If he was traded to the Vikings and knowing the contract issues they face with Bernard Berrian and Chad Greenway, would you want either of those guys?

Alvin Walton
07-26-2011, 08:47 PM
Feckin A!
I'd take Greenway!

skinsfan69
07-26-2011, 08:57 PM
For a 5th and 7th? Get that deal done asap lol. Am I the only sitting here thinking next year we might be looking at using our first, Oakland's fourth, and possibly this 5th and 7th as trade bait to move up in the draft to get our qb next year? If that's their line of thinking I'm digging that. And also add whatever we might get for Haynesworth.

As far as sources for the 5th and 7th that I'm hearing, I just got that from SS's post (http://www.thewarpath.net/redskins-locker-room/42856-2011-redskins-free-agent-rumors-reports-9.html#post813346) in the Skins free agent thread.

No one in their right mind is going to take all those mid to low round picks and move up in the first round to take one of the top QB's next year.

skinsfan69
07-26-2011, 09:01 PM
I don't understand Minnesota's front office. They're willing to part w/ draft picks for an old QB past his prime that's about to get cut? Why not wait til he's released? It's not like there's a large bidding war for McNabb's services.

SOUL-SKINS
07-26-2011, 09:03 PM
I don't understand Minnesota's front office. They're willing to part w/ draft picks for an old QB past his prime that's about to get cut? Why not wait til he's released? It's not like there's a large bidding war for McNabb's services.

shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!!! dont ruin it

mooby
07-26-2011, 09:05 PM
No one in their right mind is going to take all those mid to low round picks and move up in the first round to take one of the top QB's next year.

Even if we threw enough of them in? As long as the value matched up, or even if we threw a player in to sweeten the deal, there's no reason it couldn't happen. Doubtful but with all the crazy moves that happen in the NFL is it not possible altogether? I'm not saying we'd give them a 5th and a 7th to move up in the first, but it would certainly be reasonable to think they could make up part of the pot.

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum