2012 QB Class

Moore, RG3, and Barkley talk is a moot point. We are giving up 4 1st round picks to trade up to take Luck!!! DUH

So, not being a college FB fan, I won't make an argument about any of the qb's. I am absolutely confused by Landry44's arguments tho'. So this is mainly to you collegeFBguy:

BigC stated early on, he preferred RGIII to Landry Jones because RGIII is a better fit for what we do here. You said he(BigC) obviously doesn't watch college FB after Lotus asked why not Landry Jones.

Then later you are saying RGIII fits better here than LJ because of what we do, and say GMScud obviously has no collegeFB IQ because he prefers LJ.

Seems like you reversed your position 100%, but maybe not, I just couldn't follow your arguments, so I was hoping you could clarify your thoughts for me (a non-collegeFBguy).

Also, for me, I am just really glad that there seems to be many qb's that will be available next draft.
LMAO! I never reversed my position. Someone on here said, I'm not sure who, "I'm not sold on Landry Jones." Landry Jones is a great qb and I not once said that he wasn't. I never reversed my position on that. All I'm saying is that I believe that RG3 is a better fit for what we do here based on his mobility and accuracy. Now if I had said that I was no longer sold on Landry Jones then you would have a point.

LMAO! I never reversed my position. Someone on here said, I'm not sure who, "I'm not sold on Landry Jones." Landry Jones is a great qb and I not once said that he wasn't. I never reversed my position on that. All I'm saying is that I believe that RG3 is a better fit for what we do here based on his mobility and accuracy. Now if I had said that I was no longer sold on Landry Jones then you would have a point.

Gotcha. Here is, maybe, a consideration for you. Rather than question a person's entire college FB knowledge in a post, discuss it. Here is the original post from Big C:
not sold on landry jones as an elite prospect. like i said RGIII is my favorite and i think he would fit perfectly in our system. accurate, a leader, and extremely mobile. plus he just keeps getting better. kellen moore would be good too, regardless of arm strength issues. hes smart, reads the game well, is extremely accurate, a winner, and has a quick release.

tannehill is a good shout, but i dont know about top 3.
to which you said (in response to Lotus - not displayed here) :
Because he obviously don't know anything about football. Landry Jones is the second best qb in this draft.
But yet in your statement to GMScud, you are in agreement with BigC's second statement which is a well worded brief description of why he likes RGIII.

What is so confusing about what I'm saying? Landry Jones and Matt Barkley are both very good qbs, but RG3 is a better fit for what we do here. He's more accurate and more mobile than both Jones and Barkley. Do you disagree? If you disagree then you're only exposing your lack of football knowledge. If you agree then what are we talking about here?

So if you agree with BigC's overall point that RGIII fits better here, then maybe Big C has some reasonable CFB knowledge, and if you agree LJ is the 2nd best QB in the draft, then maybe GMScud has reasonable CFB knowledge, and you simply disagree with parts of each of their assessments.
Again, the point is rather than attacking knowledgeable fans of CFB, why not simply discuss the areas you disagree?

No one here is psychic, and most of us are simply having discussions about what we see based on our history and background knowledge, and we have the discussions because we all have a common interest in seeing the Redskins be the best team in the league year in and year out.

CRedskinsRule, for the win.

Outstanding job CRed!

We should spend less time around here accusing others of ignorance and more time understanding the opinions of others, even if they differ from ours.

I really want the Redskins to draft a QB, but only if he's caucasion. I don't care about all that talent or intangible nonsense :D

I really want the Redskins to draft a QB, but only if he's caucasion. I don't care about all that talent or intangible nonsense :D

What does this mean, a white guy that gets concussions? Like this guy?

http://i.a.cnn.net/si/2007/writers/arash_markazi/04/23/concussion.summit/p1_aikman.jpg

What does this mean, a white guy that gets concussions? Like this guy?

http://i.a.cnn.net/si/2007/writers/arash_markazi/04/23/concussion.summit/p1_aikman.jpg

I'm an inbred white guy. To expect me to spell the politically correct term for kracker is expecting to much.

I'm an inbred white guy. To expect me to spell the politically correct term for kracker is expecting to much.

:lol:

Gotcha. Here is, maybe, a consideration for you. Rather than question a person's entire college FB knowledge in a post, discuss it. Here is the original post from Big C:

to which you said (in response to Lotus - not displayed here) :

But yet in your statement to GMScud, you are in agreement with BigC's second statement which is a well worded brief description of why he likes RGIII.



So if you agree with BigC's overall point that RGIII fits better here, then maybe Big C has some reasonable CFB knowledge, and if you agree LJ is the 2nd best QB in the draft, then maybe GMScud has reasonable CFB knowledge, and you simply disagree with parts of each of their assessments.
Again, the point is rather than attacking knowledgeable fans of CFB, why not simply discuss the areas you disagree?

No one here is psychic, and most of us are simply having discussions about what we see based on our history and background knowledge, and we have the discussions because we all have a common interest in seeing the Redskins be the best team in the league year in and year out.

My man "C" is one cool MoFo. :cool-smil