Make a Decison on the Future of...

Pages : 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8

skinsguy
12-19-2011, 10:55 AM
Hightower - Bring him back as insurance, but obviously, Helu is our guy and Royster is starting to step it up as well.

Carriker - Definitely bring him back. I think Jenkins will eventually land the starting job, but I wouldn't be in a rush to bring him back with that injury.

Golston - gone.

McIntosh - Probably gone, but we do need to start thinking about drafting some good young linebackers in the next few years.

Monty - He's been solid, not awesome, but solid. There's definitely an upgrade out there, but you bring him back most definitely.

Polumbus - He should be back.

Stallworth - Ever since the Redskins had to bring Stallworth back, he's really proven himself to be a valuable asset. I would definitely bring him back to at least push the younger guys next season.

Chico23231
12-19-2011, 11:01 AM
So you're saying let Stallworth go? Bring one of the receivers you mentioned in to be a 1 or 2 and slide everyone down? Or bring one of those guys in to be a 3-5 WR?

If you look at the free agent crop of WR, their are guys with number 1 status or better potential for a 1 than anyone on currently on the team. You go out this year to get a number 1 WR. Austin and Banks are done after this year. Hankerson, Moss, Gaffney, Solid free agent, Paul/or possible late round draft pick, are the 5 i see here next year. No room for Stallworth.

Lotus
12-19-2011, 11:10 AM
So you're saying let Stallworth go? Bring one of the receivers you mentioned in to be a 1 or 2 and slide everyone down? Or bring one of those guys in to be a 3-5 WR?

The way I see it, we need playmakers at WR. I would not be surprised or dismayed if we went 1-2 in the draft on a QB and WR. Thus the others get slid down, folks like Hankey step up, and thus Stallworth becomes dead wood.

SmootSmack
12-19-2011, 11:11 AM
If you look at the free agent crop of WR, their are guys with number 1 status or better potential for a 1 than anyone on currently on the team. You go out this year to get a number 1 WR. Austin and Banks are done after this year. Hankerson, Moss, Gaffney, Solid free agent, Paul/or possible late round draft pick, are the 5 i see here next year. No room for Stallworth.

I couldn't have been more wrong about Austin. I certainly thought he'd be more of a factor this year. I suspect he and Armstrong may not be long for here. Banks I have no idea.

But put all those aside and you have Hankerson, Moss, Gaffney, and Paul let's say as your top 4.

Oh and there's also Anderson, but never mind him for now. And Aldrick Robinson

Ok so now you're saying there's no room for Stallworth because we could get a solid free agent or late round pick. Are we talking about just getting rid of Stallworth just to get rid of him then?

SmootSmack
12-19-2011, 11:14 AM
The way I see it, we need playmakers at WR. I would not be surprised or dismayed if we went 1-2 in the draft on a QB and WR. Thus the others get slid down, folks like Hankey step up, and thus Stallworth becomes dead wood.

I wouldn't be surprised to see us bring in a big time WR either. Just not sure if that pushes Stallworth out

Chico23231
12-19-2011, 11:16 AM
^ wow forgot about Armstrong, I guess that says it all about him.

Solid, play making free agent at WR is why you get rid of Stallworth.

I had Paul listed as: "Paul/late draft pic" meaning Paul could be replaced if we get someone in this years draft who could take Paul's spot. Unlikely, but possible. But I think Paul sticks next year.

GTripp0012
12-19-2011, 11:30 AM
So you're saying let Stallworth go? Bring one of the receivers you mentioned in to be a 1 or 2 and slide everyone down? Or bring one of those guys in to be a 3-5 WR?Honestly, I don't know if I can make a reasonable argument for bringing Stallworth or even Moss back. You head into next year with Jabar Gaffney as the clear go-to receiver and Leonard Hankerson as the clear number two. I mean, those two are pretty much unchallenged at this point.

Then you have your depth guys in Armstrong, Banks, and someone who we'll pick in the 2012 draft, with Aldrick Robinson challenging for one of those spots.

What's left? The slot guy. So I would think the Redskins want that to be Niles Paul. It's possible, maybe even likely, that the Redskins would keep Santana Moss in 2012 and release Paul, but that still doesn't leave an obvious spot for Stallworth, unless there's no draft or acquisition at the position.

GTripp0012
12-19-2011, 11:31 AM
^ wow forgot about Armstrong, I guess that says it all about him.

Solid, play making free agent at WR is why you get rid of Stallworth.

I had Paul listed as: "Paul/late draft pic" meaning Paul could be replaced if we get someone in this years draft who could take Paul's spot. Unlikely, but possible. But I think Paul sticks next year.I think it's either Paul or Moss as the no. 3 next year. Moss is clearly and obviously better right now, but it will be interesting to see how much they think of Niles Paul.

SmootSmack
12-19-2011, 11:36 AM
I think it's either Paul or Moss as the no. 3 next year. Moss is clearly and obviously better right now, but it will be interesting to see how much they think of Niles Paul.

Would you be comfortable with Hankerson, Moss, Gaffney as your top 3 next year?

GTripp0012
12-19-2011, 11:42 AM
Would you be comfortable with Hankerson, Moss, Gaffney as your top 3 next year?Very.

I would just wish that if they believe in these young guys (like Paul), they'd move a vet out of the way to have him play. Paul hasn't exactly ran with the opportunity just yet, but if he shows up in practice as much as the coaches say, then he should be a big part of next year's plans.

If not, then I'd be fine with Gaffney/Hankerson/Moss while we draft and develop Gaffney's replacement.

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum