Redskins "Name Change" Volume 10000000

Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

Lotus
09-13-2013, 11:15 AM
I honestly don't have the same vitriol to those who oppose the name as others do. And honestly when I hear some of the comments towards those who do oppose the name, it can be hard not to side with them

I agree with this post.

Skinzman
09-13-2013, 11:27 AM
Im not sure why people keep recommending the Warriors as an alternative name. If we are changing from Redskins, why would we change to a name that the people against Redskins say is derogatory to Indians? The Indians fighting against Redskins are going to go after the name Warriors for being derogatory to Indians if they can get the name Redskins to fall. They have already given their view of the name Warriors and they feel it should not be allowed.

HailGreen28
09-13-2013, 11:29 AM
That's exactly the route I could see them going in. I believe Snyder already has rights to the Warriors name and that uniform makes the most sense and still hangs on to the team tradition and history.If they cave in and go that route, I would like them to use colors more like burgundy and yellow than garnet and gold, the spearhead looks too much like FSU as is.

But taking the Green Bay protestors at their word, they are offended at NAs being called "warriors". So that name should be a non-starter in reference to Indians, if the name has to be changed.

Washington Sentinels, or go Washington Warriors with a modern US Army motif would make more sense. Camo or standard drabber colors? Represent a demographic that isn't "offended" by the name, and appreciates us cheering for them.

DynamiteRave
09-13-2013, 11:32 AM
Im not sure why people keep recommending the Warriors as an alternative name. If we are changing from Redskins, why would we change to a name that the people against Redskins say is derogatory to Indians? The Indians fighting against Redskins are going to go after the name Warriors for being derogatory to Indians if they can get the name Redskins to fall. They have already given their view of the name Warriors and they feel it should not be allowed.

Now Warriors is derogatory?

We need to just move to London and be the Sillynannies because it's seriously moving in that direction.

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-HOWQEqWhdeE/T1Oe0yluptI/AAAAAAAAFMQ/XxdjQ4JPsRg/s1600/London_Silllnannies.jpg

MTK
09-13-2013, 11:41 AM
Warriors is such a broad term.

If push came to shove I'd be willing to bet they would settle for that over Redskins.

Monkeydad
09-13-2013, 11:44 AM
Now Warriors is derogatory?

We need to just move to London and be the Sillynannies because it's seriously moving in that direction.

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-HOWQEqWhdeE/T1Oe0yluptI/AAAAAAAAFMQ/XxdjQ4JPsRg/s1600/London_Silllnannies.jpg

Europeans offend me.

Skinzman
09-13-2013, 11:44 AM
Now Warriors is derogatory?

We need to just move to London and be the Sillynannies because it's seriously moving in that direction.

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-HOWQEqWhdeE/T1Oe0yluptI/AAAAAAAAFMQ/XxdjQ4JPsRg/s1600/London_Silllnannies.jpg

They want all of the sports teams with anything pertaining to Indians to be changed. They are against Chiefs, Braves, Indians, Warriors, Seminoles, Blackhawks, Fighting Illini, etc. to be changed.

The NCAA already adopted that rule. Thats why Marquette changed from Warriors to Eagles and Stanford changed from Indians to Cardinals. The NCAA has a rule that if an Indian tribe ok's a name, then it can stay. Which is why Florida St. was allowed to keep Seminoles. Which prompted Suzan Harjo to say that the Seminole tribe in Florida that ok'd the name are a bunch of sell outs.

Monkeydad
09-13-2013, 11:49 AM
If they cave in and go that route, I would like them to use colors more like burgundy and yellow than garnet and gold, the spearhead looks too much like FSU as is.


They look like us.

1968 Redskins
http://img.spokeo.com/public/900-600/sonny_jurgensen_1968_10_20.jpg

1968 Florida State
https://www.gridironmemories.com/images/FLXFSU6668-180.jpg
http://miamiherald.typepad.com/.a/6a00d83451b26169e20192ac49f4b8970d-800wi



Check out their 1962 helmet...these protesters should be happy we're not using something like this!
https://www.gridironmemories.com/images/FLXFSU6262-180.jpg

They didn't copy our spear helmet until 1976.
https://www.gridironmemories.com/shop/category.asp?catid=97

Lotus
09-13-2013, 11:50 AM
Now Warriors is derogatory?

We need to just move to London and be the Sillynannies because it's seriously moving in that direction.

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-HOWQEqWhdeE/T1Oe0yluptI/AAAAAAAAFMQ/XxdjQ4JPsRg/s1600/London_Silllnannies.jpg

Warriors is considered derogatory by some folks when used in conjunction with Native American regalia. It is seen as creating an unfortunate stereotype.

If we were the "Warriors" with a nuclear missile as an emblem, things would be different.

skinsfaninok
09-13-2013, 11:53 AM
That's exactly the route I could see them going in. I believe Snyder already has rights to the Warriors name and that uniform makes the most sense and still hangs on to the team tradition and history.


I could dig that

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum