Chico23231
04-27-2015, 10:03 AM
Is there a player at #5 we are not talking about that we should? Could it be Bud Dupree?
Report: Bud Dupree will work out for Washington Redskins - NFL.com (http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000488052/article/report-bud-dupree-will-work-out-for-washington-redskins)
skinsfan69
04-27-2015, 10:36 AM
One guy's take on Beasley - Never heard of the writer or the cite, was just looking into Beasley as his name seems to be popping up a lot lately. This guy's take seem pretty fair minded:
Vic Beasley adding weight for NFL | FirstRoundGrade.com (http://firstroundgrade.com/2014/07/21/vic-beasley-adding-weight-for-nfl/)
Again, lots to like about Beasly, lots to be concerned about - did not realize he was only 235, thought he was in the 240's. Writer compares him to Bruce Irvin. Strikes me as player with potentially high ceiling but possibly maxing out as a 3rd down specialist.
As I have said, all the OLB guys strike me as risky. Fowler the least but, like Schneed said, he seems to be more of a Kerrigan player that lacks explosion. Gotta say, none of these OLB guys makes me feel particularly confident spending the 5th pick on them.
I have no problem with Beasly being 235 or 240. You could have Murphy in on run downs and bring in Beasly on pass downs. Pure explosive, speed pass rushers can change the game, get the defense off the field and cause sack/fumbles. We don't have a player like this, a Robert Quinn type of guy.
If they feel he's that kind of player then draft him. I'd much rather have that type of player than a big strong guy that isn't explosive. Seattle's defense has interchangeable players.
53Fan
04-27-2015, 11:16 AM
Following up on Chico's post.
Redskins defensive staff taking pre-draft road trip (http://was.247sports.com/Bolt/Redskins-defensive-staff-taking-pre-draft-road-trip-36980718)
Report: Browns have been in touch with Washington about No. 5 overall pick | ProFootballTalk (http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2015/04/27/report-browns-have-been-in-touch-with-washington-about-no-5-overall-pick/)
it would be nice to pick up their 12th and 19th picks.....but that might be a bit much
Alvin Walton
04-27-2015, 06:28 PM
I'll take their #12 and their second and both their 4ths.
Chico23231
04-27-2015, 06:48 PM
it would be nice to pick up their 12th and 19th picks.....but that might be a bit much
To jump to 5? 12 and 19 and additional picks most likely
I could be reading the value chart wrong.....but
Our pick is worth 1700
Cleveland 12th 1200
Cleveland 19th 875
Unless they are All in on this, we would be a little over the chart value if we get their 2 firsts
What AW suggested appears to be more of a straight up deal, but you never know how.....bad they might want to do this deal.
Irrefutable
04-27-2015, 07:58 PM
I'll take their #12 and their second and both their 4ths.
I will take it.... FYI Scot McCloughan said today he would like to have 10 picks in the draft
Shane Ray should be there at #12
Report: Shane Ray cited for marijuana possession - Campus Sports Net (http://www.campussports.net/report-shane-ray-cited-for-marijuana-possession/)