We all knew it was coming...

I wish someone would enslave me to the tune of what these ball players make.

Honestly, if we're going to take what Gibbs and Portis are saying, I don't think he is complaining about his contract. I think (so far) that rumor has been put to rest for the moment. However, not showing up because he's burnt out from football, that is nearly as worrysome.

That, to me, is actually more worrysome. Dollars and cents can be worked out........a headcase is a headcase. I sincerely hope he's not burned out already, or you can just forget wanting to please this guy now in order to keep him around for the glory years that everyone is promising. You actually have to want to play football to be a Pro Bowler.

taylor had 13 solo tackles last year... only 13..., give him a couple years before considering the big money.

taylor had 13 solo tackles last year... only 13..., give him a couple years before considering the big money.

Huh?

NFL.com lists him as having 60 solo

it's nice to see that huge disparity in yes's to no's cuz he has done absolutely nothing to warrant a new contract. If anything his off the field stuff, even the items dismissed or minor, added up have proven he shouldn't be given a new contract if that's what this is all about. The main thing that bugs me about this more than other similar situations is that he's practically ignored Gibbs' attempts to get in touch.

Huh?

NFL.com lists him as having 60 solo

then i wonder why espn has these stats listed in the linked article about this:

Tot Ast Solo FF Sack Int
76 63 13 2 1 4

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=2062608

He wasn't burned out from football. Portis was saying that he wanted to be out of the spot-light and scrutiny for a while... He was under some Self INduced heat last year and in the offseason no one is watching his every move and he is enjoying it right now. I think That is the point Portis is trying to make.

huh. i wish there was a place where all stats were real, cuz if nfl.com and espn.com both have different stats for the same player, i don't know what to believe. not only that, but madden doesn't have the same stats too.

then i wonder why espn has these stats listed in the linked article about this:

Tot Ast Solo FF Sack Int
76 63 13 2 1 4

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=2062608


They have the solos and assists backwards.

huh. i wish there was a place where all stats were real, cuz if nfl.com and espn.com both have different stats for the same player, i don't know what to believe. not only that, but madden doesn't have the same stats too.

Tackles aren't an official stat, so they tend to differ source to source.