53-man Roster Predictions

Do RGIII and JG look unhappy during the Jacksonville game? You decide.

https://twitter.com/michaelwargocsn/status/640140712491806721

Or McC wants to find a way to trade him later in the season. And I believe we can cut him at any time this season and not pay him 16 mil?


And who cares if he's on the bench?

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S6 using Tapatalk

That depends on how much drama he and his daddy stir up with social media and the press. If they are as quiet as little church mice and Daddy G stays away from the team, then OK. If not, then they need to go.

What if Dan Snyder wants to keep RGIII around in case Jay Gruden loses too many (or perhaps enough, in Snyder's mind) games. In that event, he could demand that Scot fire Gruden and replace him with a HC who will try harder to develop RGIII. Then, it would be "Here we go, again!".

One thing I promise myself is that if Snyder ever fires Scot McCloughan over this mess, than I'm done forever with Snyder and his football team. And that is coming from a lifelong Skins fan who was raised in Washington, D.C.

Or McC wants to find a way to trade him later in the season. And I believe we can cut him at any time this season and not pay him 16 mil?


And who cares if he's on the bench?

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S6 using Tapatalk

McC wants him gone...he is a major distraction and a negative force in the locker room. The longer u wait the worse it is. McC wants to move the franchise forward asap

Albert Breer and PFT reporting on twitter that McCoy is #2 QB.

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S6 using Tapatalk

Lol wow.

30gut is gonna cry

People here keep saying this, but I've never heard it anywhere else. Can someone provide a link?

if you sign a 16m guaranteed deal with another party, you just can't back out of it afterwards because you changed your mind. not without mutual consent - otherwise it's not a contract at all, it's just at will employment. I highly doubt RGIII's agent let the skins put in any kind of team option clause, cause then it's not a guaranteed contract at all.

the only problem with keeping him is that you can't bar him from practice or the facility (that's be a breach of contract suit), and if he trips and a turf goblin gets him, then we eat 16m from our 2016 team for a player that looks like he has no future here.

McC wants him gone...he is a major distraction and a negative force in the locker room. The longer u wait the worse it is. McC wants to move the franchise forward asap

Good point. He may need to go regardless of how well he may behave.

]if you sign a 16m guaranteed deal with another party, you just can't back out of it afterwards because you changed your mind. [/B] not without mutual consent - otherwise it's not a contract at all, it's just at will employment. I highly doubt RGIII's agent let the skins put in any kind of team option clause, cause then it's not a guaranteed contract at all.

But that's exactly the way the 5th year option works. Griffin didn't sign a new contract, the Skins just picked up that option, which is part of the original rookie contract Griffin signed. If the Skins want to rescind the option for any reason, they can do so without Griffin's consent.

But that's exactly the way the 5th year option works. Griffin didn't sign a new contract, the Skins just picked up that option, which is part of the original rookie contract Griffin signed. If the Skins want to rescind the option for any reason, they can do so without Griffin's consent.

and once that option is picked up, it's binding. if he's on the roster, he gets the money, if he's not, he doesn't, unless he's hurt, cause the option is guaranteed against injury.

John Keim
ESPN Staff Writer


The Redskins have made at least two more cuts Saturday, releasing tackle Takoby Cofield and guard Tyler Larsen, per sources. The Redskins do like Cofield so it would make sense for them to re-sign him to the practice squad. They have him their highest signing bonus among undrafted players.