Thrash is a Redskin WOW????? (Merged)

The Philadelphia Inquirer is reporting that the deal won't be final until 4 PM Tuesday because the Redskins need time to clear some cap space to accommodate Thrash. I wonder who's going to be cut ... maybe Larry Moore?

Maybe Trung?

Could be Dave Flore. There real is no hope for him to play again. It will be a med buy out deal now or in June!

Well, two things come to mind here.

One: Gardner's days are numbered. Bringing in another receiver and making noises about pying Mcants (and calling him the next Monk!) point to that. The question is what can we get, and how much can we clear on the cap by moving him.

Two: Special teams. Either Gibbs really wants to have two threats, or Morton may be in trouble. What can we get for him, and how much cash can we save? He's pricey, but productive.

Both Gardner and Morton have some value. Maybe we'll package em? And throw in Trotter for good measure? Hmmmm....very interesting.

In the real world trading three cap hits like that for a pick is great for the team pushing them out the door! What teams out there are there that would even look at that deal...players or pick? If you can find it. Make it so!!!!

Well, two things come to mind here.

One: Gardner's days are numbered. Bringing in another receiver and making noises about pying Mcants (and calling him the next Monk!) point to that. The question is what can we get, and how much can we clear on the cap by moving him.

Two: Special teams. Either Gibbs really wants to have two threats, or Morton may be in trouble. What can we get for him, and how much cash can we save? He's pricey, but productive.

Both Gardner and Morton have some value. Maybe we'll package em? And throw in Trotter for good measure? Hmmmm....very interesting.

I agree 100%. Maybe Gibbs saw something at minicamp that he felt a need to fix ... perhaps something not right with Chad ... or he could just want depth or Thrash for punts and Chad for KOs. It would be great if we could add a boatload of draft picks as a result of all these moves.

I must once again beg to differ with all you guys. Its is true that gibbs won 3 superbowl rings, but that was coaching. This is something completely different building a team. Which bobby Beathared was a master at. Gibbs is essiantially doing what they did in his first stint. Trying to load up at every position. See mark Brunell, Griffen, Springs, and now Thrash. While they are all good players, we broke the bank for all of them. Severally overpaying for all of them. And while everybody is happy now, just what 2 years, when the cap devil comes. Gibbs doesn't understand the concept of cheap labor. I have no problem with putting a high proyority on special teams, just draft a player to do it. And let me put out another little hint to everybody, when the Skins front office acts completely radical to EVERY other team in the league. its not because they know something nobody else knows. Its because we have a dumb ass owner running the team, who didn't know what he was doing before, and now can't say no to Gibbs.

And let me put out another little hint to everybody, when the Skins front office acts completely radical to EVERY other team in the league. its not because they know something nobody else knows. Its because we have a dumb ass owner running the team, who didn't know what he was doing before, and now can't say no to Gibbs.

I've been hearing about the salary cap ramifications of Snyder's moves since he bought the team. Remember how adding Bruce Smith, Jeff George and Deion were going to ruin the Redskins' cap? Never happened, did it? Snyder is willing to overpay but not all that money is guaranteed and not all of it counts against the cap. We're lucky to have an owner who's willing to spend. Ask the Bengals and some other teams what it's like to have a cheap owner. They'll tell you it sucks. Regardless, this is Joe Gibbs' team now. And I'll go with him everytime, no matter how many of my fellow fans are exasperated by his personnel moves.

And even if you are right and this does turn out to be a fruitless trade, what's the harm? We lose a 5th round pick in 2005. BFD.

I might have missed it but where did it say this was entirely Gibbs' decision?

Regardless, I think it's important to remember that building a team is a marathon, not a sprint. Sometimes you need see the forest for trees...and other cliches and proverbs.

At this moment, I'd agree that trading for Thrash is an unnecessary move. However, all indications are Jacobs looked strong in minicamp, McCants is about to get a new contract it seems (probably indicative of a no. 2 or 3 receiver, and Coles is Coles. So let's say we add Thrash to bolster our special teams and provide a solid veteran on our receiving core to help tutor Taylor who for all intents and purposes is a rookie and McCants who is still very raw.

So the odd man out is Gardner. He's young, he's already been a 1,000 yard receiver. He doesn't have a significant injury history. I think he'll easily get the team a 3rd round pick. And they can get a 4th for Trotter. What has been the biggest beef with the Redskins offseason? That they're mortgaging their future by giving away all their draft picks. But with Gardner and Trotter trades now you've got a 1st, 3rd, 4th, 5th and 6th. Plus you've added Washington, Springs, Portis, Brunell, etc.

Yeah it's a lot of "ifs" and "maybes" but isn't that what makes it fun?

i think we'll get at least a fifth round pick for gardner, so that gives us the pick back. plus i think thrash is good value for the fifth round... how soon we forget how productive he can be when he's a number 3 WR.

I'm not saying this particular move is gonna kill us, after all its just a 5th round pick. I just think its clear now that we need a expert running the team, and Gibbs coaching it. I don't think he understands today's nfl from a manangement stand point. Nor should he be expected too, he's a coach.