|
Pages :
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
[ 13]
14
15
DYoungJelly 06-07-2016, 08:23 PM PFF: Redskins have the 12th worst roster in the NFL - Hogs Haven (http://www.hogshaven.com/2016/6/6/11868588/pff-redskins-have-the-12th-worst-roster-in-the-nfl)
Just saw this and literally laughed out loud.
ACCORDING TO PFF, we had the 27th ranked roster in 2015, finished 9-7 and won the division.
I know some of us on here, including NFL GMs posing as Warpath participants, put more stock into PFF's evaluations than others.
I've been scanning through old posts looking for 30gut's demands to give Gruden a contract extension without any luck.
Please post the link to the old post if ya got it.
mredskins 06-07-2016, 08:27 PM PFF: Redskins have the 12th worst roster in the NFL - Hogs Haven (http://www.hogshaven.com/2016/6/6/11868588/pff-redskins-have-the-12th-worst-roster-in-the-nfl)
Just saw this and literally laughed out loud.
ACCORDING TO PFF, we had the 27th ranked roster in 2015, finished 9-7 and won the division.
I know some of us on here, including NFL GMs posing as Warpath participants, put more stock into PFF's evaluations than others.
I've been scanning through old posts looking for 30gut's demands to give Gruden a contract extension without any luck.
Please post the link to the old post if ya got it.
The Eagles are number 5? Lol! I pissed my pants on that one.
Skinzman 06-07-2016, 09:42 PM The Eagles are number 5? Lol! I pissed my pants on that one.
I almost choked when I read the article and they were listed at 5. Please tell me this is some kind of a joke. The Eagles are the worst team in the division and are listed as a top 2 or 3 team in the NFC (given 1-4 has to contain at least a couple of AFC teams). I have never been a fan of PFF, but they have lost their damn minds if they consider the Eagles the 5th most talented team in the NFL.
That Guy 06-08-2016, 12:25 AM pff, still garbage.
sdskinsfan2001 06-08-2016, 02:15 AM PFF: Redskins have the 12th worst roster in the NFL - Hogs Haven (http://www.hogshaven.com/2016/6/6/11868588/pff-redskins-have-the-12th-worst-roster-in-the-nfl)
Just saw this and literally laughed out loud.
ACCORDING TO PFF, we had the 27th ranked roster in 2015, finished 9-7 and won the division.
I know some of us on here, including NFL GMs posing as Warpath participants, put more stock into PFF's evaluations than others.
I've been scanning through old posts looking for 30gut's demands to give Gruden a contract extension without any luck.
Please post the link to the old post if ya got it.
I put stock in common sense. Somehow if we have a harder schedule we're going 3-13. But other good teams get a harder schedule they have no fall off. If you come in 1st place you get a harder schedule, that doesn't mean you suck the next year, unless you're us. We have more talent than we did last year plus a QB who played at a pro bowl type level down the stretch and now it's 100% his team. That's freedom, qbs play better when they're allowed to have a stink game or 2. Tired of the hate. 11-5 this year. My prediction.
NC_Skins 06-08-2016, 12:44 PM Well, we do have the 3rd ranked secondary according to PFF. At least we got that going for us.
https://www.profootballfocus.com/pro-ranking-all-32-nfl-cornerback-groups/
Find it hilarious that Dallas ranks 27th, yet felt the need to draft a RB with a premium DB talent on the board.
Schneed10 06-08-2016, 01:00 PM The Eagles are number 5? Lol! I pissed my pants on that one.
The only way they can possibly come up with that is if they are failing to properly weight the importance of each position. The Eagles are deep in certain spots - Guard comes to mind, they just went out and shopped in free agency and now their line is pretty deep.
But if the best you can muster is Sam Bradford as your starting QB then how good are you, really?
They have depth in spots but it's negated by weaknesses at key positions like QB, CB and WR. They're poor at all three. And at LT they're relying on an aging Jason Peters who seems to be getting injured more and more often.
PFF so often misses the forest for the trees. They do all these calculations but get so knee deep in their numbers that they forget to perform any common sense gut checks. Clowns.
JoeRedskin 06-08-2016, 06:42 PM Find it hilarious that Dallas ranks 27th, yet felt the need to draft a RB with a premium DB talent on the board.
That's one of those, four years down the road, when the rookie contracts are expiring, where the pick has the potential for being one of those extremes that is referenced forever like Portland passing on MJ to pick Sam Bowie or the Colts going with Manning over Leaf.
Several years ago, Dallas was blasted for picking a center (T. Frederick) who was rated as a second or third rounder. Turns out he has been a pro bowl performer and every day starter since day one. On the other hand, they were praised for trading up and taking the top CB in the 2012 draft (M. Claiborne) and he has just plain busted. If Ezekiel turns into the next AP, well, then "Brilliant." If not, or if Jalen Ramsey is the next Ronnie Lott, well, then "Derp!" ... but that's kind of how the draft works.
Unless Ezekiel really outperforms Ramsey and the Cowboys fix their DB's, I am thinking they will end up regretting this pick.
I really don't hate the Ezekiel pick, with that line he could easily be ROY.
JoeRedskin 06-09-2016, 05:49 PM Well, that's kind of the point, Ramsey is sitting there and you are in desperate need of DB help. Sure, you don't have a bell-cow runner ... but do you need one behind that line? If Elliot is really something special maybe you pass up Ramsey - who was considered pretty special as well. But, if he not a once in a decade kind of back, it could really back fire on them.
<crossing fingers for Trent Richardson part deux>
|