Will You Still Wear Your Skins Gear After?

UC Berkeley is known for having an agenda.

Step onto the campus with a different viewpoint and you get assaulted.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-california-ucberkeley-lawsuit-idUSKBN1HX2B4

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2020/01/31/berkeley-coronavirus-xenophobia/

https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/2019/02/27/conservative-activist-was-punched-face-uc-berkeley-response-enraged-right/

^^ detour this straight forward thread about wearing Skins gear .... into something about Ben Shapiro and college students assaulting people.

https://static3.srcdn.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/jim-feature-the-office.jpg

Simply a response to the previous comment about bias in the polls/studies.

Youre good MD, I dont mean to bump heads with you.

Ive said my thoughts on how all these threads are just merging into the same subject matter. Now im the one repeating myself in multiple threads lol. The irony is not lost on me.

UC Berkeley is known for having an agenda.

Step onto the campus with a different viewpoint and you get assaulted.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-california-ucberkeley-lawsuit-idUSKBN1HX2B4

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2020/01/31/berkeley-coronavirus-xenophobia/

https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/2019/02/27/conservative-activist-was-punched-face-uc-berkeley-response-enraged-right/

Sure, but it is an excellent academic institution. Any study, survey, or poll they do is going garner some interest.

The problem with polls is that NOBODY actually reads them let alone scrutinizes them. But we all love to quote them, especially if it fits our pov.

Sure, but it is an excellent academic institution. Any study, survey, or poll they do is going garner some interest.

The problem with polls is that NOBODY actually reads them let alone scrutinizes them. But we all love to quote them, especially if it fits our pov.

Most polls are created to achieve predetermined results.

When you look at the metrics, it's never balanced. The last Presidential election really exposed that.

Youre good MD, I dont mean to bump heads with you.

Ive said my thoughts on how all these threads are just merging into the same subject matter. Now im the one repeating myself in multiple threads lol. The irony is not lost on me.

I'm honestly sick of talking politics too...but it was forced upon us and took over our sport, which used to be an ESCAPE from politics.

I'll try not to get sucked back in so much, at least in the Locker Room.


I just want to see the players on the field, preferably running, not kneeling, and sing HAIL TO THE REDSKINS again. :D


We're all here because we love this team, whatever it's called...so there's no reason to turn on each other.

Most polls are created to achieve predetermined results.

When you look at the metrics, it's never balanced. The last Presidential election really exposed that.

It was years ago, but the three earlier polls used standard methodology.

I am unable to scrutinize the UCB one as I would have to shell out money and since it is game over, there is no point.

But, examining the comments of someone who did, one finds this:

Startlingly, for a poll about a football team, only 31 percent of the respondents were “Cisgender men,” the other 69 percent being “Cisgender women; transgender, nonbinary, and genderqueer people;” the Berkeley survey authors found that the latter were significantly more opposed to the team name. The Post sample, by contrast, was 49 percent male. It also appears that the Berkeley survey’s respondents skewed younger (typical for an online survey), with 47 percent under the age of 35; the Post sample had a higher share of respondents age 50 or older (39 percent) than the Berkeley survey’s 33 percent who were aged 45 or older. Again, the younger respondents were much more opposed.

Not what I would call objective, but it's all moot now.

Hey, they like football too.



https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fbloximages.newyork1.vip.townnews. com%2Ftheadvocate.com%2Fcontent%2Ftncms%2Fassets%2 Fv3%2Feditorial%2Ff%2F7f%2Ff7ffa193-2471-5dc3-b952-e429e386fca7%2F5b773b8ba4d78.image.jpg%3Fresize%3D 1200%252C702&f=1&nofb=1

Absolutely. I will also be open to new gear only if the name is close to the Indian or Chief. If it is the Wolf or Retails forget it. No way I'm wearing that nonsense.