Samuels: Campbell has 6-7 games to prove himself (radio quote)
 

[url=http://www.cbssports.com/mcc/messages/chrono/16352683]Samuals says JC has 6-7 Games to prove himself - CBSSports.com Message Boards[/url]

Following day 1 practices chris samuels was asked about [URL="http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/players/playerpage/407793"][COLOR=#0066cc]Jason Campbell[/COLOR][/URL] on redskin radio. Samuels said he thinks jason has 6-7 games to prove himself this year. This qoute was provided by kevin sheehan on [URL="http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/teams/page/WAS"][COLOR=#800080]Redskins[/COLOR][/URL] radio, when zorn was asked about samuels comment he didnt deny this was the opinion of the coaching staff and said its a good thing to challenge teamates.. FINALLY[IMG]http://images.cbssports.com/tinymce/jscripts/tiny_mce/plugins/emotions/img/smiley-laughing.gif[/IMG]

IS this related to this: [URL="http://insider.espn.go.com/nfl/features/rumors?&action=login&appRedirect=http%3a%2f%2finsider.espn.go.com%2fnfl%2ffeatures%2frumors"]NFL Football Rumors - NFL Rumors - National Football League Rumor Central - ESPN[/URL]

If someone has access to espn insider please post

*Who ever wrote that original post that I copied and pasted was a dumb @ss. If they didn't know how to spell Samuels..Duh

Re: Samuels quot eon Campbell provided by Kevin Sheen on Redskins radio
 

FREE AGENCY: Momentum builds for Vick to Skins
Michael Vick | Falcons | Interested: Redskins? Patriots? Ravens? Raiders? Saints?
Jason Campbell can't catch a break. At nearly every step this offseason, the Redskins have been linked to another QB, and with comments made recently by Jim Zorn and some other 'Skins coaches, he may have Michael Vick breathing down his neck at some point this season.
An anonymous Redskins coach told Fox 31 in Denver that, "There is definitely a number of us who would love to have him play here. I can tell you I would not mind at all."

While a little bit dismissive, head coach Jim Zorn left the door open in saying before Washington's first training camp practice that they would not be signing Vick "at this juncture." The insinuation here is that the team will have Vick's cell number handy if Campbell struggles to start the 2009 campaign.

Meanwhile, Vick's contention that he was close to signing with a team has been refuted by what a source has told ESPN's John Clayton. Clayton notes that it's likely we won't see a Vick signing until training camps are "well under way".

Re: Samuels quote on Campbell provided by Kevin Sheen on Redskins radio
 

6-7 games..when did they say Vick would be eligible to play after the 6 game or earlier..hmmmmm..I think there is something behind this. I am rooting for JC but I find this very interesting..

People must also keep in mind. People are going to try to keep it low key and I did read on Tanner Cooley's blog that Vick was in the area (Lansdowne) a couple days ago...Hmmmm..Something to ponder..

TannerCooley:Wondering why Michael Vick is in Lansdowne and even more, why was he at Buffalo Wing Factory in Ashburn earlier today??
[URL="http://twitter.com/tannercooley/status/2882128076"]Twitter / Tanner Cooley: Wondering why Michael Vick ...[/URL]

Also keep in mind DeAngelo Hall is here and is a big Vick supporter and may have given his input and also that Vick is from VA...Hmmmm

Re: Samuels quote on Campbell provided by Kevin Sheen on Redskins radio
 

[quote=DBUCHANON101;571552]FREE AGENCY: Momentum builds for Vick to Skins
Michael Vick | Falcons | Interested: Redskins? Patriots? Ravens? Raiders? Saints?
Jason Campbell can't catch a break. At nearly every step this offseason, the Redskins have been linked to another QB, and with comments made recently by Jim Zorn and some other 'Skins coaches, he may have Michael Vick breathing down his neck at some point this season.
An anonymous Redskins coach told Fox 31 in Denver that, "There is definitely a number of us who would love to have him play here. I can tell you I would not mind at all."

While a little bit dismissive, head coach Jim Zorn left the door open in saying before Washington's first training camp practice that they would not be signing Vick "at this juncture." The insinuation here is that the team will have Vick's cell number handy if Campbell struggles to start the 2009 campaign.

Meanwhile, Vick's contention that he was close to signing with a team has been refuted by what a source has told ESPN's John Clayton. Clayton notes that it's likely we won't see a Vick signing until training camps are "well under way".[/quote]

Thanks

Re: Samuels quot eon Campbell provided by Kevin Sheen on Redskins radio
 

C-O-N-spiracy

Re: Samuels quot eon Campbell provided by Kevin Sheen on Redskins radio
 

It's doesn't matter. Vick is most definitely not coming here after Snyder said, in passing, that "he is not a fit here" on the John Thompson show. The Danny has spoken.

Re: Samuels quot eon Campbell provided by Kevin Sheen on Redskins radio
 

[quote=dmvskinzfan08;571556][B]6-7 games..when did they say Vick would be eligible to play after the 6 game or earlier..hmmmmm..I think there is something behind this.[/B] I am rooting for JC but I find this very interesting..

People must also keep in mind. People are going to try to keep it low key and I did read on Tanner Cooley's blog that Vick was in the area (Lansdowne) a couple days ago...Hmmmm..Something to ponder..

Also keep in mind DeAngelo Hall is here and is a big Vick supporter and may have given his input and also that Vick is from VA...Hmmmm[/quote]

I think it would be season over to give JC 6-7 games if he is struggling to the point where you want to bench him and THEN bring in another QB who hasnt taken a single snap with the team. if you dont have faith in JC,TC or CB then go ahead now and get someone in here who can learn until/IF decision time comes.

Re: Samuels: Campbell has 6-7 games to prove himself (radio quote)
 

I would only want Vick for punt returner/kick returner/HB/QB "gimic plays". I covet his explosivenss and elusiveness. I view him as an offensive weapon. Wouldn't be good idea if he is not in training camp as a QB. If we gonna have a season like that I would rather see Colt.

Re: Samuels: Campbell has 6-7 games to prove himself (radio quote)
 

ho hum. the skins are always linked to anyone that looks some what attractive. show me some proof

Re: Samuels: Campbell has 6-7 games to prove himself (radio quote)
 

[quote=dmek25;571565]ho hum. the skins are always linked to anyone that looks some what attractive. show me some proof[/quote]

Agreed, just because some random assistant in the coaching staff likes Vick, it doesn't mean he's coming here. I'm sure the many Campbell haters would love for anyone (even someone that hasn't played a snap in two years) to play at QB (like that moron with the "DC wants Vick" sign at training camp).

Two things tell me that Vick is unlikely, first if there was a remote possibility of this happening, Mike Florio would have been on this like flies to shit. Second, I think the only person that can get away with signing Vick is Darth Hoody.

Re: Samuels: Campbell has 6-7 games to prove himself (radio quote)
 

[quote=Ruhskins;571567]Agreed, just because some random assistant in the coaching staff likes Vick, it doesn't mean he's coming here. I'm sure the many Campbell haters would love for anyone (even someone that hasn't played a snap in two years) to play at QB (like that moron with the "DC wants Vick" sign at training camp).

Two things tell me that Vick is unlikely, first if there was a remote possibility of this happening, [B]Mike Florio[/B] would have been on this like flies to shit. Second, I think the only person that can get away with signing Vick is Darth Hoody.[/quote]


Sure, thats a reputable source! I am suprised that he hasn't started that rumor anyway.

Re: Samuels quote on Campbell provided by Kevin Sheen on Redskins radio
 

[quote=dmvskinzfan08;571556][B]6-7 games..when did they say Vick would be eligible to play after the 6 game or earlier..hmmmmm..I think there is something behind this.[/B] I am rooting for JC but I find this very interesting..

People must also keep in mind. People are going to try to keep it low key and I did read on Tanner Cooley's blog that Vick was in the area (Lansdowne) a couple days ago...Hmmmm..Something to ponder..

TannerCooley:Wondering why Michael Vick is in Lansdowne and even more, why was he at Buffalo Wing Factory in Ashburn earlier today??
[URL="http://twitter.com/tannercooley/status/2882128076"]Twitter / Tanner Cooley: Wondering why Michael Vick ...[/URL]

Also keep in mind DeAngelo Hall is here and is a big Vick supporter and may have given his input and also that Vick is from VA...Hmmmm[/quote]


You're thinking too much. Stop worrying. Why would we get Vick in the middle of the season and expect him to take us to the playoffs when he has to learn a WHOLE new offense and get refamiliar with the game of football? Snyder's not even that dumb.

Re: Samuels: Campbell has 6-7 games to prove himself (radio quote)
 

[quote=Angry;571568]Sure, thats a reputable source! I am suprised that he hasn't started that rumor anyway.[/quote]

Well I didn't mention him as a reputable source, it is just that since he hates the Redskins,he takes any bad half-truth rumor about the team and blasts it all over his website.

Re: Samuels quote on Campbell provided by Kevin Sheen on Redskins radio
 

[quote=chrisl13;571569]You're thinking too much. Stop worrying. Why would we get Vick in the middle of the season and expect him to take us to the playoffs when he has to learn a WHOLE new offense and get refamiliar with the game of football? Snyder's not even that dumb.[/quote]

I am not advocating getting him. I just wanted to point out that Vick ran the WCO in ATL. The only major differences would be in the running game.

Re: Samuels: Campbell has 6-7 games to prove himself (radio quote)
 

[quote=Ruhskins;571567]Agreed, [B]just because some random assistant in the coaching staff likes Vick[/B], it doesn't mean he's coming here. I'm sure the many Campbell haters would love for anyone (even someone that hasn't played a snap in two years) to play at QB (like that moron with the "DC wants Vick" sign at training camp).[/quote]
And who the hell is "Josina Anderson of Fox 31 in Denver". And why would a low level "anonymous" Redskins coach be talking to him. This report stinks real bad and I can't believe anyone is giving it any credence.

But, Anderson does mention "a Redskins defensive starter" witnessed fans holding up Vick signs. Game over, Vick's as good as signed.

Here's the rest of the blog/article:
[FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=2]However when this same coach was asked about the likelihood of Vick appearing on a field he coaches on at Redskins Park, the source replied, “I tell you what, his name has not come up in any meeting I have been a part of yet.”[/SIZE][/FONT]

[FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=2]So, naturally the next question after that was, would Vick’s name come up in any meetings this source participates in?[/SIZE][/FONT]

[FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=2]“Yes and no. Information gets passed on and shared in our meetings. They can ask for our input as well.”[/SIZE][/FONT]

[FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=2]I also spoke with a Redskins defensive starter Thursday evening who said he had not personally heard any Vick news directly, or indirectly, from sources closer to Vick. However, he did witness some Washington fans making their own sentiments known at the facility earlier.[/SIZE][/FONT]

[FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=2]“I tell you what, they were holding up signs that had Michael Vick’s name on it at practice.”[/SIZE][/FONT]

Re: Samuels quot eon Campbell provided by Kevin Sheen on Redskins radio
 

[quote=DBUCHANON101;571552]FREE AGENCY: Momentum builds for Vick to Skins
Michael Vick | Falcons | Interested: Redskins? Patriots? Ravens? Raiders? Saints?
Jason Campbell can't catch a break. At nearly every step this offseason, the Redskins have been linked to another QB, and with comments made recently by Jim Zorn and some other 'Skins coaches, he may have Michael Vick breathing down his neck at some point this season.
An anonymous Redskins coach told Fox 31 in Denver that, "There is definitely a number of us who would love to have him play here. I can tell you I would not mind at all."

While a little bit dismissive, head coach Jim Zorn left the door open in saying before Washington's first training camp practice that they would not be signing Vick "at this juncture." The insinuation here is that the team will have Vick's cell number handy if Campbell struggles to start the 2009 campaign.

Meanwhile, Vick's contention that he was close to signing with a team has been refuted by what a source has told ESPN's John Clayton. Clayton notes that it's likely we won't see a Vick signing until training camps are "well under way".[/quote]

Okay, so the "momentum" allegedly building is evidenced by a Redskin coach mentioning that several members of the coaching staff wouldn't mind having him on the team. What a stupidly misleading headline.

By the way, the headline has now been changed on the site to add Baltimore to the mix.

Re: Samuels: Campbell has 6-7 games to prove himself (radio quote)
 

[quote=Slingin Sammy 33;571572][B]And who the hell is "Josina Anderson of Fox 31 in Denver". And why would a low level "anonymous" Redskins coach be talking to him. This report stinks real bad and I can't believe anyone is giving it any credence.[/B]

But, Anderson does mention "a Redskins defensive starter" witnessed fans holding up Vick signs. Game over, Vick's as good as signed.

Here's the rest of the blog/article:
[FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=2]However when this same coach was asked about the likelihood of Vick appearing on a field he coaches on at Redskins Park, the source replied, “I tell you what, his name has not come up in any meeting I have been a part of yet.”[/SIZE][/FONT]

[FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=2]So, naturally the next question after that was, would Vick’s name come up in any meetings this source participates in?[/SIZE][/FONT]

[FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=2]“Yes and no. Information gets passed on and shared in our meetings. They can ask for our input as well.”[/SIZE][/FONT]

[FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=2]I also spoke with a Redskins defensive starter Thursday evening who said he had not personally heard any Vick news directly, or indirectly, from sources closer to Vick. However, he did witness some Washington fans making their own sentiments known at the facility earlier.[/SIZE][/FONT]

[FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=2]“I tell you what, they were holding up signs that had Michael Vick’s name on it at practice.”[/SIZE][/FONT][/quote]

[quote=web bio]Josina started her career at the CBS affiliate in Coos Bay, Oregon as a sports anchor/reporter. From Oregon,[B] she moved to Washington D.C. as a sports reporter covering the Washington Redskins, Washington Wizards, Georgetown Hoyas, and the Maryland Terrapins for several local cable shows including the Sideline Report, the Round Ball Report, and Redskins Magazine. Josina also hosted her own weekly radio sports segment on WKYS 93.9[/B] called ScoopCenter.[/quote]

Sounds like she may have made some contacts here during this stint. and maybe she wants back on a national scene.

Re: Samuels: Campbell has 6-7 games to prove himself (radio quote)
 

[quote=CRedskinsRule;571578]Sounds like she may have made some contacts here during this stint. and maybe she wants back on a national scene.[/quote]
This explains things a little bit, but isn't she the one that started the "Cutler's a drunk" fiasco and later had to retract/clarify her remarks.

I think you're right, someone's looking for some web hits and name recognition.

Re: Samuels: Campbell has 6-7 games to prove himself (radio quote)
 

I think I remember her now. I think she may have gone by a different name here. But we could always ask Tony about her

Anyway, I think we're reading too much into things here

Re: Samuels: Campbell has 6-7 games to prove himself (radio quote)
 

[quote=dmvskinzfan08;571551][url=http://www.cbssports.com/mcc/messages/chrono/16352683]Samuals says JC has 6-7 Games to prove himself - CBSSports.com Message Boards[/url]

Following day 1 practices chris samuels was asked about [URL="http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/players/playerpage/407793"][COLOR=#0066cc]Jason Campbell[/COLOR][/URL] on redskin radio. Samuels said he thinks jason has 6-7 games to prove himself this year. This qoute was provided by kevin sheehan on [URL="http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/teams/page/WAS"][COLOR=#800080]Redskins[/COLOR][/URL] radio, when zorn was asked about samuals comment he didnt deny this was the opinion of the coaching staff and said its a good thing to challenge teamates.. FINALLY[IMG]http://images.cbssports.com/tinymce/jscripts/tiny_mce/plugins/emotions/img/smiley-laughing.gif[/IMG]

IS this related to this: [URL="http://insider.espn.go.com/nfl/features/rumors?&action=login&appRedirect=http%3a%2f%2finsider.espn.go.com%2fnfl%2ffeatures%2frumors"]NFL Football Rumors - NFL Rumors - National Football League Rumor Central - ESPN[/URL]

If someone has access to espn insider please post[/quote]

Did anyone hear the Samuels interview? The only reason we have to think this is an issue at all is if we trust that someone screen named crackerman22 accurately heard the interview. Samuels could be misquoted here.

Re: Samuels: Campbell has 6-7 games to prove himself (radio quote)
 

[quote=Lotus;571595]Did anyone hear the Samuels interview? The only reason we have to think this is an issue at all is if we trust that someone screen named crackerman22 accurately heard the interview. Samuels could be misquoted here.[/quote]

You mean Samuals, who was interviewed only because Carlos Rodgers was busy helping Chad Rhinedhart change a flat tire on Jason Cambell's truck :)

Re: Samuels quote on Campbell provided by Kevin Sheen on Redskins radio
 

[quote=chrisl13;571569]You're thinking too much. Stop worrying. Why would we get Vick in the middle of the season and expect him to take us to the playoffs when he has to learn a WHOLE new offense and get refamiliar with the game of football? Snyder's not even that dumb.[/quote]

Not thinking too much. Not worrying. Who said he was going to take us to the playoffs? he may need to learn an offense..he might be rusty but I don't think he needs to learn how to play football again. As for the last sentence. [B]He has gotten smarter over the past few years....But I can think more than a few times he made dumb moves.[/B] But usually they were for players who were past their prime by a long shot. IE Bruce Smith, Deion Sanders..He has made better moves but I wont call any of them beneficial @ this point..

Re: Samuels quote on Campbell provided by Kevin Sheen on Redskins radio
 

[quote=dmvskinzfan08;571598]Not thinking too much. Not worrying. Who said he was going to take us to the playoffs? he may need to learn an offense..he might be rusty but I don't think he needs to learn how to play football again. As for the last sentence. He has gotten smarter over the past few years....But I can think more than a few times he made dumb moves. But usually they were for players who were past their prime by a long shot. IE Bruce Smith, Deion Sanders..He has made better moves but I wont call any of them beneficial @ this point..[/quote]

Define beneficial

Re: Samuels quote on Campbell provided by Kevin Sheen on Redskins radio
 

[quote=SmootSmack;571600]Define beneficial[/quote]

Do you want the literal definition or are you asking me to state what benefits we have received from some of Dan's signings since he's been here. (being an ass vs legitimate debate)..Which one?

As for signings that have worked in our favor or have giving us some sort of advantage. There haven't been many. But there have been some improvements despite some enormous busts..Do you want me to define enormous?

Re: Samuels quote on Campbell provided by Kevin Sheen on Redskins radio
 

[quote=dmvskinzfan08;571602]Do you want the literal definition or are you asking me to state what benefits we have received from some of Dan's signings since he's been here. (being an ass vs legitimate debate)..Which one?

As for signings that have worked in our favor or have giving us some sort of advantage. There haven't been many. But there have been some improvements despite some enormous busts..Do you want me to define enormous?[/quote]

Well you mentioned that usually he makes moves for players past their prime. Which was true 10 years ago, and true with Archuleta (and not Jason Taylor, because JT had just come off a 12 sack season I believe); but for the most part we have not gone after "past their prime" players. You also mentioned he's made better moves but wouldn't call any of them beneficial. To which I would ask, how do you define beneficial? Did we benefit from having Shawn Springs, Todd Collins, Cornelius Griffin, Marcus Washington, Clinton Portis, Santana Moss when we made the playoffs?

Re: Samuels: Campbell has 6-7 games to prove himself (radio quote)
 

Are you a Daniel Snyder apologist? I actually like Dan for this reason. He might not have made all the right moves in the past. But atleast he put his money where his mouth was and spent bucks trying. Eventhough he was learning on the go. But I will agree with u in that some of those players helped us out. But alot of them were old or injury prone. We make splashes in free agency. But rarely get someone who can help us for the long run. CP trade was definitely a good move. Moss good move. Todd Collins good move to compliment Saunders system. The rest are iffy. I do agree he is is getting better. Definitely. Drafting and signing free agents. But it took him a long time to concentrate on the D-line.

Re: Samuels quote on Campbell provided by Kevin Sheen on Redskins radio
 

[quote=dmvskinzfan08;571598]Not thinking too much. Not worrying. Who said he was going to take us to the playoffs? he may need to learn an offense..he might be rusty but I don't think he needs to learn how to play football again. As for the last sentence. [B]He has gotten smarter over the past few years....But I can think more than a few times he made dumb moves.[/B] But usually they were for players who were past their prime by a long shot. IE Bruce Smith, Deion Sanders..He has made better moves but I wont call any of them beneficial @ this point..[/quote]

Read bold print. I agree with you

Re: Samuels: Campbell has 6-7 games to prove himself (radio quote)
 

[quote=dmvskinzfan08;571604]Are you a Daniel Snyder apologist? I actually like Dan for this reason. He might not have made all the right moves in the past. But atleast he put his money where his mouth was and spent bucks trying. Eventhough he was learning on the go. But I will agree with u in that some of those players helped us out. But alot of them were old or injury prone. We make splashes in free agency. But rarely get someone who can help us for the long run. CP trade was definitely a good move. Moss good move. Todd Collins good move to compliment Saunders system. The rest are iffy. I do agree he is is getting better. Definitely. Drafting and signing free agents. But it took him a long time to concentrate on the D-line.[/quote]

Not an apologist. I think though that too many people think Dan Snyder and instantly they think Deion Sander and overpriced, past their prime players. And clearly his regime as owner should not be focused only on that move.

Re: Samuels: Campbell has 6-7 games to prove himself (radio quote)
 

True. I agree. Like I said I rather have an owner who isn't afraid to spend his money and learn from his mistakes than a owner that sits back and does nothing. He was young and has grown and him and Cerrrato have matured a lot as far as personnel decisons go. I've always personally liked Dan (because I know he would do anything to make us winners). Just not all of his decisions he's made in "the past".

Re: Samuels: Campbell has 6-7 games to prove himself (radio quote)
 

I have to wonder why Samuels just came out and said this. Usually guys are like this is our QB and we are going to ride him to the wheels fall off,pass or fail. not i think we give him X amount of games and if he is struggling we move on.

Re: Samuels: Campbell has 6-7 games to prove himself (radio quote)
 

yea buchanon that's what I was thinking also

Re: Samuels: Campbell has 6-7 games to prove himself (radio quote)
 

[quote=dmek25;571565]ho hum. the skins are always linked to anyone that looks some what attractive. show me some proof[/quote]

Exactly

Re: Samuels quot eon Campbell provided by Kevin Sheen on Redskins radio
 

[quote=BringBackJoeT;571577]Okay, so the "momentum" allegedly building is evidenced by a Redskin coach mentioning that several members of the coaching staff wouldn't mind having him on the team. What a stupidly misleading headline.

By the way, the headline has now been changed on the site to add Baltimore to the mix.[/quote]

Nevertheless, it is disappointing to hear any coach on the skins wouldn't mind having him on the team.

On a separate note, I'm not a Campbell supporter, but I believe him to be a better QB than Vick. Vick can run, he can do things that Campbell cannot, but Vick is not a good QB. In addition, it is important for a team to support its QB, and whether or not Campbell is right for the team, if he is deemed to be the QB for the Redskins, it is entirely out of bounds for any assistant coach to make any comments that can be in anyway misconstrued as supporting the idea of a QB change.

Re: Samuels quot eon Campbell provided by Kevin Sheen on Redskins radio
 

[quote=Coff;571652]Nevertheless, it is disappointing to hear any coach on the skins wouldn't mind having him on the team.

On a separate note, I'm not a Campbell supporter, but I believe him to be a better QB than Vick. Vick can run, he can do things that Campbell cannot, but Vick is not a good QB. In addition, it is important for a team to support its QB, and whether or not Campbell is right for the team, if he is deemed to be the QB for the Redskins, it is entirely out of bounds for any assistant coach to make any comments that can be in anyway misconstrued as supporting the idea of a QB change.[/quote]

Any team that gets Vick is going to get him at the league minumum for a player with his tenure. He'll be a situational player... not a threat to any credible starting QB. Even if, by chance, he were to land with the Sninz, he is no threat to JC. Jizzle Cizzle will get every opportunity to succeed. It's his team for now.

Re: Samuels: Campbell has 6-7 games to prove himself (radio quote)
 

We are Still learning the WCO i dont want to see us go all wildcat just to get one guy on the field.

Re: Samuels: Campbell has 6-7 games to prove himself (radio quote)
 

I believe JC did everything he needed to do for us to be successful last year.Could he have done more???Maybe.Even with holes in the o line,he still got the ball to recievers,who would drop the ball at the most inopportune time in just about every game.

Re: Samuels: Campbell has 6-7 games to prove himself (radio quote)
 

Chris Samuels needs to focus on doing his job better. The reason Jason Campbell is on a short leash, is because he spent too much time getting sacked. If Samuels and his fellow offensive linemen, took it upon themselves to do something about that, the quarterback controversy would cease. Most quarterbacks, given ample pass protection, get the job done. Campbell is not exception. When he has time and the receivers get separation, he delivers. Everyone on this offense needs to do a better job, coaches included.

Re: Samuels: Campbell has 6-7 games to prove himself (radio quote)
 

What does that Pineapple Jesus mean?

Re: Samuels: Campbell has 6-7 games to prove himself (radio quote)
 

[quote=joethiesmanfan;572065]What does that Pineapple Jesus mean?[/quote]

Is this question 3?

Re: Samuels: Campbell has 6-7 games to prove himself (radio quote)
 

Well last year he looked great after 6 to 7 games.