Cardinals new logo
 

What do you think?

[img]http://test.azcardinals.com/images/images/helmetpicturest.jpg[/img]

Looks like the old one?

looks almost identical

here's an article about the logo [URL=http://www.azcardinals.com/news/news_details.html?iid=2586]change[/URL]

They gave the card a little hair gel and a badass attitude (which is shown via the black outline!)

Honestly, was this change needed? Will they benefit from this in any way? Seems sorta superficial to me.

All they need now is a big bushy afro, and Moss will be dying to be traded to the Cards. Adding the slogan "Straight cash, homey" to the logo would top it off quite nicely.

Reminds of when the Seahawks switched to a slightly-more-intimidating, sleeker bird logo a couple years back. Eages did it to their helmets recently, too.

looks exactly like louisville

i must say i like the cardinals more now that they are out of the east

i wouldnt have known that it was new if i wasnt looking at both side by side. but i guess its better, i just dont know if the team is tougher, lol

It's a goofy looking bird either way but it looks worse as an angry goofy bird. What a dumb helmet design - a big cartoon cardinal. I guess the Cardinals is not a great name for a football team to begin with. Personally I would change the helmet entirely and put something to do with the state of Arizona on it - some play on their state flag perhaps - and change the uniforms with it. They have a cool state flag actually.

They are going to be changing the uniforms too.

Are there any actual Cardinals in Arizona? I guess it's no worse than Rams being in St. Louis.

Reminds me when MD changed the terrapin logo. I liked the older happy turtle logo better.

Its not exactly like Louisville because Louisville's logo shows the bird gritting its teeth and the teeth can be seen.

Its the same thing the Falcons did. The Birds dont want to be "too nice" so they just shape it a little different, but its alright.

Kind of hard to make a Cardinal tough though...don''t you think?

Malcolm - do you live in Virginia? Those little bastard birds dive bomb me every day on the way to my car!

[QUOTE=Daseal]Malcolm - do you live in Virginia? Those little bastard birds dive bomb me every day on the way to my car![/QUOTE]

hmmm...maybe a better logo would have been the birds in "action"

They de-pussified their logo just like the Eagles...lol

and ravens

The cardinal is the state bird of VA. But the eagle is not the state bird of PA, the ruffed grouse is.

[QUOTE=Daseal]Malcolm - do you live in Virginia? Those little bastard birds dive bomb me every day on the way to my car![/QUOTE]

Ok, so [I]those[/I] Cardinals have some offense....The ones in Zona don't.

[QUOTE=PSUskinsfan11]looks exactly like louisville[/QUOTE]
Yup that's what I thoght.

Well, it's about damn time they did [I]something[/I] with that logo. Still, there's just not a whole lot you can do with the Cardinals.

I thought, given their recent history, they would scrap the whole thing and change their name, colors and everything. Just start completely over.

Arizona Rattlers maybe? Arizona Outlaws?

Now if the Colts would get more interesting, and the Titans reiterate what exactly they are -- plus get a new logo, everything will be fine.

Why does everybody's bird have to look "tough?" They stole the Falcons idea all the way.

almost same old and same old
 

Not many things are consistant in today's society, but the Arizona Cardinals defy all rationale and common sense by being terrible every year. And I am sure if the Niner's had played the cards 16 times last season they could give the fins a run for the perfect record. This new logo is almost the same and the cardinals still stay as the same old stinky birds.

the old falcons logo wasnt tought was it? the ravens might have been one of the first tough ones. The eagles will always be pussies in my mind, i dont care what their logo is. and i cant recall off the top of my head how tough the seahawks is now and hwat their old one looks like

The Arizona Cardinals do not need a tougher looking logo nor do they need "edgier" uniforms - to be unveiled at a later date.

What they need are tougher players who have an edge...

Yeah it's basically just a suttle change such as the Eagles' logo.
Makes me wonder if the Redskins will ever decide to update their logo? I like the current logo, wouldn't mind them doing the curled feather like they did in '82.....

They need to lose the white helmets. They could at least look good while losing.

[QUOTE=PSUskinsfan11]looks exactly like louisville[/QUOTE]

same thing I was thinking

Daseal, DUDE I know exactly what you're saying. I'm not going to say or NOT say that I sometimes end up hurting them, but you can just use your imagination. Those bastards piss me off.

So many updates while I was out of town on job interview, it's going to take me like 12 work hours to catch up!