NFL Network to Review the NFC East Today
 

Just checked. According to [url]http://www.nfl.com/nflnetwork/daily_sked[/url], Sterling Sharpe Division breakdown for today is the NFC East

7 p.m. and 10 p.m. ET -- Total Access

Do we come out on top?

Sharpe is pretty unbiased I think.

Re: NFL Network to Review the NFC East Today
 

Still think its too soon to do any predicting, the east is the toughest division in the NFL, all 4 teams have claims to come out on top and i dont care what some "expert" has to say about it. In the end it will come down to the team with the least injuries, best depth and the most determination.

that doesnt mean i wont be watching it, thanks for the update :biggthump

Re: NFL Network to Review the NFC East Today
 

Don't have Network can someone put the major points in the baord that he says of each team

Re: NFL Network to Review the NFC East Today
 

[QUOTE=Hail2theskins]Still think its too soon to do any predicting . . .[/QUOTE]

Two Words:

Al

Saunders

Re: NFL Network to Review the NFC East Today
 

Well yeah as much of an impact he will have I thinnk we'll really see Saunders offense in full effect in his 2nd season

Re: NFL Network to Review the NFC East Today
 

[QUOTE=Hail2theskins]Well yeah as much of an impact he will have I thinnk we'll really see Saunders offense in full effect in his 2nd season[/QUOTE]

Yeah, maybe, but how many more games would we have won if we had had Saunders last year. I say we have at least a TD better offense, which means we probably would have had home field advantage for 1 or 2 games.

Re: NFL Network to Review the NFC East Today
 

valid point, a touchdown better a game, puts us ahead of seattle in the playoffs, KC, Denver and Tampa Bay

Re: NFL Network to Review the NFC East Today
 

[QUOTE=Hail2theskins]valid point, a touchdown better a game, puts us ahead of seattle in the playoffs, KC, Denver and Tampa Bay[/QUOTE]

Yes, Hail2, barring serious injuries, we're playing in Miami in February!!!!

Re: NFL Network to Review the NFC East Today
 

Made good points about Randel El and Archelleta being fairly bad signings for the price we paid. Pretty much said we haven't improved much from last year. Gave decent reasoning for it. Said Archelleta is a hitter and in our division will be forced to match up vs TEs and he sees that as a huge problem.

Re: NFL Network to Review the NFC East Today
 

Except that Sean Taylor and Marcus Washington will be covering the TEs.

Adam will be keying on run support!

Re: NFL Network to Review the NFC East Today
 

[quote=Daseal]Made good points about Randel El and Archelleta being fairly bad signings for the price we paid. Pretty much said we haven't improved much from last year. Gave decent reasoning for it. Said Archelleta is a hitter and in our division will be forced to match up vs TEs and he sees that as a huge problem.[/quote]

yeah that pretty much summed it up. He didn't even mention Carter or Lloyd though and the impact they are going to have.

Re: NFL Network to Review the NFC East Today
 

[QUOTE=Daseal]Made good points about Randel El and Archelleta being fairly bad signings for the price we paid. Pretty much said we haven't improved much from last year. Gave decent reasoning for it. Said Archelleta is a hitter and in our division will be forced to match up vs TEs and he sees that as a huge problem.[/QUOTE]
Here's my quarrel with that assesment. What does price have to do with performance. Randle El as a third WR and punt returner and we haven't improved much over Thrash? Isn't Brandon Lloyd an upgrade from Patten? I can agree somewhat about Archuleta being a hitter vs. a cover safety but is he better than Clark? With the way that Williams runs his defense I can't see them utilizing him in coverage much..

Re: NFL Network to Review the NFC East Today
 

[QUOTE=Daseal]Made good points about Randel El and Archelleta being fairly bad signings for the price we paid. Pretty much said we haven't improved much from last year. Gave decent reasoning for it. Said Archelleta is a hitter and in our division will be forced to match up vs TEs and he sees that as a huge problem.[/QUOTE]
I have always felt Sharpe was a big time group thinker. He tends to espouse those types of views seeing as he came from the group think training grounds of ESPN.

His points about players for the dollars are somewhat valid if taken within the [B]IN[/B]proper context. But in our case and a few others it simply takes more analysis than simply looking at it and saying we over-paid. There are basically two strategies for shaping a team's payroll. One involves careful structuring of salaries balanced with reasonable signing bonuses. The other calls for expanded bonuses with minimal initial salaries. The benefits of each can be argued but each basically allows teams to build talented teams. The Skins of course have pioneered the later. When these group thinkers say we over-paid they are looking at total value mostly which is of course often very irrelevant since no player will ever end up making the money of the entire contract. One advantage of this type of contracting is that it does allow you to seemingly pay "more" for players so when they say we over paid we actually in reality based on the context of the Skins contracting structure really didn't. They paid about market price when adjusted for their contracting structure in other words.

As far as not getting much better I am simply perplexed. Our main offensive problem last year was our lack of a 2nd WR. We added 2. Problem solved times 2. Our other offensive issues are lack of overall offensive effectiveness and an aging QB. We adde Saunders which can only be seen as helping the former and there wasn't much to be done about the latter. As far defense goes we addressed our main concern by acquiring a pash rusher of greater value than we have had in years and I am really perplexed by his valuation of Arch. Is he saying what we had was just as good? I think most objective scouts realize Arch is far better in coverage than he used to be and brings a serious upgrade in hitting the the secondary. That is definitely better than what we had.

We were one TD away from the NFC championship. With health we are obvious contnders since we have upgraded at the few spots where we needed.

Re: NFL Network to Review the NFC East Today
 

Price is right! (sorry, couldn't resist) Price has nothing to do with performance.

And one other thing FRPLG. Adam's performance in coverage while with the Rams can't be compared with what he'll do in our much more agressive, better disguised defense.

Re: NFL Network to Review the NFC East Today
 

I am simply hung up on the fact that he was so hung up on randle el as if he was going to be our #2 reciever. He completley neglected the fact that we signed lloyd and he will in my opinion easily be the number 2 next year. Randle El not only brings a better #3 reciever but he brings a lot to our special teams play.