Commanders Post at The Warpath - View Single Post - A funny anti-kerry image [Dems need not click]

Daseal · 08-14-2004, 10:52 AM

I guess you don't consider Iraqi's citizens. We killed 2300 Iraqi Civilians during just the air raids on Iraq. The US rarely losses citizens because we almost always bring the war to them. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontl...dix/death.html

http://www.iraqbodycount.net/ -- That includes things such as suidice bombers, because they say if (in Jon Stewart's words) the coallision forces made up of the US and a crazy Australian with a bowie knife, weren't there the bombers also wouldn't be there, which I can agree with. These numbers are alarming, and guess what. It's a hell of a lot more civilians than we lost, and we wonder why they want us to go home!

Skins - Consider picking Bush because when a rogue band of terrorists attacks our homeland he goes rushing into Iraq shown to have absolutely no affilliation with Al-Quada (sp?). He's not doing anything about it, he's using the World Trade Center to promote his own agenda. I love how before the war (which I opposed from the begining) everyone talked about WMD's, and how many terrorists we could bag. Now all they can say is what a bad guy Saddam is. Yeah, he was a bad guy, but I think we have more important things than taking out dictators. Either that or we have a long list to go. We won't touch Kim Jong Il and he was and is much more of a threat than Iraq.

08-14-2004, 10:52 AM	#1
Daseal Puppy Kicker Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Arlington, Virginia Age: 42 Posts: 8,341	I guess you don't consider Iraqi's citizens. We killed 2300 Iraqi Civilians during just the air raids on Iraq. The US rarely losses citizens because we almost always bring the war to them. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontl...dix/death.html http://www.iraqbodycount.net/ -- That includes things such as suidice bombers, because they say if (in Jon Stewart's words) the coallision forces made up of the US and a crazy Australian with a bowie knife, weren't there the bombers also wouldn't be there, which I can agree with. These numbers are alarming, and guess what. It's a hell of a lot more civilians than we lost, and we wonder why they want us to go home! Skins - Consider picking Bush because when a rogue band of terrorists attacks our homeland he goes rushing into Iraq shown to have absolutely no affilliation with Al-Quada (sp?). He's not doing anything about it, he's using the World Trade Center to promote his own agenda. I love how before the war (which I opposed from the begining) everyone talked about WMD's, and how many terrorists we could bag. Now all they can say is what a bad guy Saddam is. Yeah, he was a bad guy, but I think we have more important things than taking out dictators. Either that or we have a long list to go. We won't touch Kim Jong Il and he was and is much more of a threat than Iraq.