A funny anti-kerry image [Dems need not click]

[Daseal]

I guess you don't consider Iraqi's citizens. We killed 2300 Iraqi Civilians during just the air raids on Iraq. The US rarely losses citizens because we almost always bring the war to them. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontl...dix/death.html

http://www.iraqbodycount.net/ -- That includes things such as suidice bombers, because they say if (in Jon Stewart's words) the coallision forces made up of the US and a crazy Australian with a bowie knife, weren't there the bombers also wouldn't be there, which I can agree with. These numbers are alarming, and guess what. It's a hell of a lot more civilians than we lost, and we wonder why they want us to go home!

Skins - Consider picking Bush because when a rogue band of terrorists attacks our homeland he goes rushing into Iraq shown to have absolutely no affilliation with Al-Quada (sp?). He's not doing anything about it, he's using the World Trade Center to promote his own agenda. I love how before the war (which I opposed from the begining) everyone talked about WMD's, and how many terrorists we could bag. Now all they can say is what a bad guy Saddam is. Yeah, he was a bad guy, but I think we have more important things than taking out dictators. Either that or we have a long list to go. We won't touch Kim Jong Il and he was and is much more of a threat than Iraq.

[love them hogs]

Hey daseal if you remeber correctly we went into Afganastan first after the towers went down and not Iraq.We invaded Iraq because we already had our forces in the region.

Now about the WMDs when we first went into Iraq there wasnt a single usable water truck in the country because they were contaminated with jet fuel wich is commnoly used to hide the presence of chemical weapons.

I dont know about the rest of you but I dont live in fear and I grew up ten minutes away from the pentagon.I think Bush did the right thing invading Iraq and afganastan.Im tired of people thinking that You can stop terrorist by non violent actions.THe terrorists only demand is that we die and talking to them isnt going to change that.They only respect violence and if that is what they want then that is what they should get.

[love them hogs]

p.s. The number of Iraqi civillians we killed is nothing compared to the number of Iraqis that saddam killed so you do the math.

[skinsfanthru&thru]

Originally Posted by Daseal

http://www.iraqbodycount.net/ -- That includes things such as suidice bombers, because they say if (in Jon Stewart's words) the coallision forces made up of the US and a crazy Australian with a bowie knife, weren't there the bombers also wouldn't be there, which I can agree with. These numbers are alarming, and guess what. It's a hell of a lot more civilians than we lost, and we wonder why they want us to go home!

with the constant religious turmoil in iraq, it's hard to believe there wouldn't be any suicide bombings occuring occasionaly in iraq. there might not be as many suicide bombings, but to say there wouldn't be any at all if we weren't there is pretty much just wishful thinking. Plus there'd still be a multitude of iraqi supported suicide bombings in other countries if saddam hadn't been taken out of power. so blaming bush and the american people for what the fanatic suicide bombers r doing is kinda just political bs as is the misleading quote about the average iraqi citizens being killed. How in anyone's mind can one year of war(whether u were for it or against it), which unfortunately has innocent casualties, equal over a decade of a ruler and his sons torturing and killing thousands of his own people?

but yeah like That Guy said, all this arguing over the same things constantly is getting old quick.

[SmootSmack]

Once again, That Guy is right.

Those that want to discuss this stuff ad nauseum go check out Bozzy's site
http://www.unrulypolitics.com