Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012
I would argue that Global Warming is something that is testable and falsifiable though the Scientific Method.
Unlike Evolutionary theory, the evidence that has been found in recent times adds futher support for Global Warming/Climate Change. Darwinian Theory remains only as strong as it was on the day he published it (scientifically, that is).
Both have strong cases, and I'm not trying to disprove either. Just trying to show where the similaries end; basically show the limits of the scientifc method.
I also think that scientific advancement organizations are lacking in credibility now. Not science itself. Don't confuse the two.
|
Perhaps, but testable here only will give us a snap shot, based on pretty sketchy information by the way, of basically one moment in time of our planet. That may be testable but what it tells us is pretty much nothing.