Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Off-Topic Discussion > Parking Lot

Parking Lot Off-topic chatter pertaining to movies, TV, music, video games, etc.


What constitutes anti-religious bigotry?

Parking Lot


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-23-2009, 01:24 PM   #1
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
Re: What constitutes anti-religious bigotry?

Quote:
Originally Posted by firstdown View Post
Not sure why it suprises you that organization of science don't want this debated as they do this all the time. Just look at Global Warming. While most agree that the earth has warmed over the years if you don't agree with science that its man made then your nuts. Even though other scientest disagree the majority think they know it all and they won't even debate the subject. I personaly don't care how man came about.
I would argue that Global Warming is something that is testable and falsifiable though the Scientific Method.

Unlike Evolutionary theory, the evidence that has been found in recent times adds futher support for Global Warming/Climate Change. Darwinian Theory remains only as strong as it was on the day he published it (scientifically, that is).

Both have strong cases, and I'm not trying to disprove either. Just trying to show where the similaries end; basically show the limits of the scientifc method.

I also think that scientific advancement organizations are lacking in credibility now. Not science itself. Don't confuse the two.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2009, 02:03 PM   #2
FRPLG
MVP
 
FRPLG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 10,164
Re: What constitutes anti-religious bigotry?

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
I would argue that Global Warming is something that is testable and falsifiable though the Scientific Method.

Unlike Evolutionary theory, the evidence that has been found in recent times adds futher support for Global Warming/Climate Change. Darwinian Theory remains only as strong as it was on the day he published it (scientifically, that is).

Both have strong cases, and I'm not trying to disprove either. Just trying to show where the similaries end; basically show the limits of the scientifc method.

I also think that scientific advancement organizations are lacking in credibility now. Not science itself. Don't confuse the two.
Perhaps, but testable here only will give us a snap shot, based on pretty sketchy information by the way, of basically one moment in time of our planet. That may be testable but what it tells us is pretty much nothing.
FRPLG is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.71357 seconds with 11 queries