![]() |
|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
\m/
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,832
|
NFL 30 To Watch: Kedric Golston, Defensive Tackle, Washington Redskins
Full Article: NFL 30 To Watch: Kedric Golston, Defensive Tackle, Washington Redskins - Sports Blog - The FanHouse
A regular look at 30 people who will affect the 2007 NFL season. After being one of the league's best defenses in 2005, the Redskins plummeted to 32nd last year. The club also ranked dead last in pass defense, but that was partly due to an inadequate pass rush. Injuries, old age and a stubborn assistant head coach - defense all conspired against the 'Skins in '06, but heading into the draft it was clear what needed to be done: Washington had to draft a defensive lineman, preferably a bad-ass pass rusher. Because Dan Snyder is ... well, Dan Snyder, the team drafted safety LaRon Landry with the sixth-overall pick. Head coach Joe Gibbs even declared that the defensive line was in fine shape (which explains why the Redskins didn't take one with any of their five draft picks). ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
MVP
Join Date: May 2005
Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,460
|
Re: NFL 30 To Watch: Kedric Golston, Defensive Tackle, Washington Redskins
Without reading the article yet, did anyone else notice that both Golston and Montgomery are heavier this year.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
The Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Kingston, Jamaica
Age: 38
Posts: 2,418
|
Re: NFL 30 To Watch: Kedric Golston, Defensive Tackle, Washington Redskins
Yes, I read that both bulked up significantly
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
\m/
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,832
|
Re: NFL 30 To Watch: Kedric Golston, Defensive Tackle, Washington Redskins
Golston needed some beef, he was about 290 last year, but I thought Montgomery slimmed down a bit? Or maybe he just added muscle and toned up.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
A Dude
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Newtown Square, PA
Age: 46
Posts: 12,458
|
Re: NFL 30 To Watch: Kedric Golston, Defensive Tackle, Washington Redskins
Quote:
This means both should be weighing in around 315 pounds. Which makes me feel warm and fuzzy. My number one concern with our defense is stopping the run up the middle. In Year 2, Montgomery Eyes a 'Big' Step Up
__________________
God made certain people to play football. He was one of them. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
\m/
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,832
|
Re: NFL 30 To Watch: Kedric Golston, Defensive Tackle, Washington Redskins
Quote:
Seriously though, it's very good to hear. Golston seems to have the frame to handle the weight, and let's face it speed wasn't his game anyway. All these guys need to do is control the line of scrimmage and not get shoved around, and let the LBs fly in and do their jobs. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
The Starter
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Warrenton, Virginia
Age: 45
Posts: 1,515
|
Re: NFL 30 To Watch: Kedric Golston, Defensive Tackle, Washington Redskins
London is going to need to be free and clear to make contact with the rb, not the guard. At his age, it's harder to separate from a big blocker. We needed more bulk to hinder that second tier blocking.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,439
|
Re: NFL 30 To Watch: Kedric Golston, Defensive Tackle, Washington Redskins
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
\m/
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,832
|
Re: NFL 30 To Watch: Kedric Golston, Defensive Tackle, Washington Redskins
I think Golston proved last year he can play at this level, the jury is still out on Montgomery.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 721
|
Re: NFL 30 To Watch: Kedric Golston, Defensive Tackle, Washington Redskins
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
You did WHAT?!?
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: In The Kitchen With Dyna.
Age: 36
Posts: 14,185
|
Re: NFL 30 To Watch: Kedric Golston, Defensive Tackle, Washington Redskins
Quote:
I know this was for Schneed, but I don't see any of our defensive lineman getting cut, we need the depth. Our rotation is important. Plus big Joe can still give us some huge snaps off the bench and be a big part of our rotation.
__________________
https://open.spotify.com/artist/1NG9zNxqMP8cYNP72QqUQT Shameless self-promotion. It is what it is. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
The Starter
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Warrenton, Virginia
Age: 45
Posts: 1,515
|
Re: NFL 30 To Watch: Kedric Golston, Defensive Tackle, Washington Redskins
Why would we do that? It's our policy to rotate the sub-par defensive line so that atleast they have some energy as the game progresses.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
A Dude
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Newtown Square, PA
Age: 46
Posts: 12,458
|
Re: NFL 30 To Watch: Kedric Golston, Defensive Tackle, Washington Redskins
There's no salary cap motivation to cut him, so if he does get cut, it will be because he's simply outplayed by 4 other DTs on the roster. Griffin, Montgomery, and Golston are sure bets for the roster. I think Big Joe still has a good chance to make it, but he'll be in a dogfight with Boschetti and a few other guys.
__________________
God made certain people to play football. He was one of them. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 721
|
Re: NFL 30 To Watch: Kedric Golston, Defensive Tackle, Washington Redskins
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Manassas
Age: 54
Posts: 3,048
|
Re: NFL 30 To Watch: Kedric Golston, Defensive Tackle, Washington Redskins
I don't get the "Dan Snyder being Dan Snyder, they took a safety" line. I've had my fill of these lists, forecasts, and roundups from the national press. I think we Warpathers are spoiled. I can get draft analysis that is better than these turds from National Press from anyone of ten schmoes at this site. Which means that either the national press sucks or we have some exceptional schmoes here.
__________________
This Monkey's Gone to Heaven |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|