Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Randy McMichael Might Be Available

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-05-2007, 07:18 PM   #1
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Randy McMichael Might Be Available

So the inevitable question is should we consider going after him?

ESPN.com - NFL - Report: Dolphins to release tight end McMichael
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2007, 07:22 PM   #2
FRPLG
MVP
 
FRPLG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 10,164
Re: Randy McMichael Might Be Available

I say no. We have bigger fish to fry.
FRPLG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2007, 07:24 PM   #3
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: Randy McMichael Might Be Available

Quote:
Originally Posted by FRPLG View Post
I say no. We have bigger fish to fry.
For the record I agree. Just curious what the board thinks. I think the only additions we should make on offense are on the line. Some say our WR corps needs to be upgraded, I say they need more time together

But McMichael can definitely play, just shouldn't be our priority
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2007, 07:30 PM   #4
Beemnseven
Pro Bowl
 
Beemnseven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 51
Posts: 5,311
Re: Randy McMichael Might Be Available

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
For the record I agree. Just curious what the board thinks. I think the only additions we should make on offense are on the line. Some say our WR corps needs to be upgraded, I say they need more time together

But McMichael can definitely play, just shouldn't be our priority
Count me in with the "no thanks" crowd. Many people say we need another tight end. I don't agree. There aren't many double TE sets in Saunders' offense anyway.

Get a blocking TE through undrafted free agency, that should do it for us.
Beemnseven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2007, 11:45 PM   #5
EARTHQUAKE2689
You did WHAT?!?
 
EARTHQUAKE2689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: In The Kitchen With Dyna.
Age: 36
Posts: 14,185
Re: Randy McMichael Might Be Available

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
For the record I agree. Just curious what the board thinks. I think the only additions we should make on offense are on the line. Some say our WR corps needs to be upgraded, I say they need more time together

But McMichael can definitely play, just shouldn't be our priority

add me to the like him but dont go after him club way more needs than him and he is looking to make big money i say before we sign a new tight end we should extend colley's contract
__________________
https://open.spotify.com/artist/1NG9zNxqMP8cYNP72QqUQT

Shameless self-promotion. It is what it is.
EARTHQUAKE2689 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2007, 07:59 PM   #6
dall-assblows
The Starter
 
dall-assblows's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: round the way
Age: 42
Posts: 2,211
Re: Randy McMichael Might Be Available

Quote:
Originally Posted by FRPLG View Post
I say no. We have bigger fish to fry.
1 question: what kind of fish will be be frying?
__________________
SOMEBODY PINCH ME
dall-assblows is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2007, 11:42 PM   #7
EARTHQUAKE2689
You did WHAT?!?
 
EARTHQUAKE2689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: In The Kitchen With Dyna.
Age: 36
Posts: 14,185
Re: Randy McMichael Might Be Available

Quote:
Originally Posted by dall-assblows View Post
1 question: what kind of fish will be be frying?

i always liked salmon
__________________
https://open.spotify.com/artist/1NG9zNxqMP8cYNP72QqUQT

Shameless self-promotion. It is what it is.
EARTHQUAKE2689 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2007, 07:23 PM   #8
jdlea
Playmaker
 
jdlea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, VA
Age: 41
Posts: 3,109
Re: Randy McMichael Might Be Available

He might not be a need, but he'd be a nice luxury. I've always liked him, outside of his domestic disputes, I like the way he plays.
jdlea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2007, 08:05 PM   #9
NM Redskin
The Starter
 
NM Redskin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 1,014
Re: Randy McMichael Might Be Available

I figured if we did go after a free agent TE it would be more of a blocker than catching TE.
__________________
Despite my solid 40 time and great intangibles I went undrafted AGAIN!
NM Redskin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2007, 09:44 PM   #10
DGreene28
Special Teams
 
DGreene28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 335
Re: Randy McMichael Might Be Available

Quote:
Originally Posted by NM Redskin View Post
I figured if we did go after a free agent TE it would be more of a blocker than catching TE.

True Cooley is not a great blocker... McMicheal is even worse, we need at least one decent blocking TE. Plus McMicheal will make some bank in FA.
__________________
Optimism can make you look stupid, but cynicism always makes you look cynical. - Calum Fisher
DGreene28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2007, 09:49 PM   #11
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: Randy McMichael Might Be Available

Quote:
Originally Posted by DGreene28 View Post
True Cooley is not a great blocker... McMicheal is even worse, we need at least one decent blocking TE. Plus McMicheal will make some bank in FA.
Welcome to the board

Why'd you put an "e" at the end of Green?

Where in CT do you live?
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2007, 12:59 PM   #12
hesscl34
Registered User
 
hesscl34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Germantown, MD
Posts: 2,782
Re: Randy McMichael Might Be Available

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
Welcome to the board

Why'd you put an "e" at the end of Green?

Where in CT do you live?
Cool new Avatar!!! ... I want it!!!
hesscl34 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2007, 08:18 PM   #13
BeastsoftheNFCeast
Special Teams
 
BeastsoftheNFCeast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 331
Re: Randy McMichael Might Be Available

Although having McMichael would be cool, I say we shouldn't get him. But him just being on the market is good for us. It means that other TE's values go down because there is now more and better options than them, and it also means that those people searching for TE's might potentially get McMichael instead of a guy that we want to target.
BeastsoftheNFCeast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2007, 08:24 PM   #14
skinsfan_nn
Playmaker
 
skinsfan_nn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Newport News,Virginia
Age: 60
Posts: 4,495
Re: Randy McMichael Might Be Available

I hope we can sign Yoder fairly cheap. This guy is a solid blocker and can catch very well. I hope they give this guy a shot, he could be a solid backup to the Capt........COOOOOLEY!

McMichael, to low on the priority list.
__________________
"There's no greater feeling than moving a man from Point A to Point B, against his will." #68

THANKS COACH GIBBS FOR EVERYTHING! YOUR THE MAN AND ALWAYS WILL BE!
skinsfan_nn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2007, 08:25 PM   #15
RMSkins
The Starter
 
RMSkins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Harrisburg, PA
Age: 37
Posts: 1,066
Re: Randy McMichael Might Be Available

McMichael might be looking for a pretty big contract as well, and plus we have bigger needs to address.
RMSkins is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 1.30875 seconds with 10 queries