Peter King's view on the Briggs deal

[SmootSmack]

Originally Posted by Grim21Reaper

I have heard this argument one hundred times.

Urlacher also has Briggs next to him. That theory goes both ways. Urlacher is not Ray Lewis or Lawrence Taylor. He has definitely benefitted from having a great line and a pro-bowler next to him. I don't buy that Briggs is good only because Urlacher is next to him.

The Chicago D is good because they have studs everywhere, not just because of an over-hyped MLB.

I agree 100%

[redskinsfanatic]

they would not be nearly as good without urlachler though!

[RedskinPete]

Originally Posted by 12thMan

King failed to point out that Briggs a) has Urlacher playing beside him and b) he had one helluva defensive line in front of him.

A helluva line? I saw that line get run over by a Colt running game that by far is not the best in the NFL in the Super Bowl!

[skinsfan69]

I don't put any stock into what Peter King says. The guy is a clown.

1. King said Danny Weurfuel was going to be the next Kurt Warner when OBC took over.
2. King at first said Monk shouldn't be in the HOF.

[firstdown]

Another Briggs thread?