Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Taylor to Return w/o Restructure or Paycut

Locker Room Main Forum


View Poll Results: Keeping Jason Taylor at his current $8.5M salary is...
A good move, thumbs up 37 32.17%
A bad move, I hate it 78 67.83%
Voters: 115. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-22-2009, 05:59 PM   #16
DirtyLandry
Special Teams
 
DirtyLandry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: lost in the sauce
Posts: 377
Re: Taylor to Return w/o Restructure or Paycut

Hey 44! we agree on something! right on.
__________________
"I just went from six to midnight."
DirtyLandry is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 02-22-2009, 06:04 PM   #17
44ever
Registered User
 
44ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: The Fortune Teller
Posts: 2,512
Re: Taylor to Return w/o Restructure or Paycut

Quote:
Originally Posted by DirtyLandry View Post
Hey 44! we agree on something! right on.
Yeah, I just hope we don't look like two chumps next season. Oh well at least we'll agree we were wrong

I think we are right about JT. But I understand the concern from Goat and some of the others who don't like the move.
44ever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2009, 06:07 PM   #18
Hamoskinz
Special Teams
 
Hamoskinz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Samoa
Posts: 180
Re: Taylor to Return w/o Restructure or Paycut

F..., I would rather we kept MW. @ 8.5m, JT is sodomising this franchise. Great move Vinny, its becoming typical Redskins offseason moves. Well, this has certainly soured the beginning of what is already a crummy week.
Hamoskinz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2009, 06:17 PM   #19
GMScud
Swearinger
 
GMScud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 12,626
Re: Taylor to Return w/o Restructure or Paycut

I'm glad he didn't restructure. If he did, it would mean spreading his cap numbers out over the next few seasons. If a new CBA is reached, that would mean his numbers would count against us when he won't even be on the team. No thanks. We've done enough of spreading out contracts of older players with our "restructuring."

I say we experiment with Andre Carter at full time LDE, and put Taylor where he has excelled in the past - RDE. It's not like Carter dominated from the right side last year. Of course if that happens, we'll need a damn good Will LB to play behind Taylor for run support.

In light of this decision by Vinny and the gang, I expect Shawn Springs to be gone, especially since we're in full-on negotiations with D.Hall. I also think IF Phillip Daniels is still in the teams plans even after he hits the FA market, he'll be playing for the vet minimum.
__________________
Tardy
GMScud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2009, 06:19 PM   #20
44ever
Registered User
 
44ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: The Fortune Teller
Posts: 2,512
Thumbs down Re: Taylor to Return w/o Restructure or Paycut

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hamoskinz View Post
F..., I would rather we kept MW. @ 8.5m, JT is sodomising this franchise. Great move Vinny, its becoming typical Redskins offseason moves. Well, this has certainly soured the beginning of what is already a crummy week.
Not nessecary man.

Last edited by 44ever; 02-22-2009 at 07:19 PM.
44ever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2009, 06:27 PM   #21
44ever
Registered User
 
44ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: The Fortune Teller
Posts: 2,512
Re: Taylor to Return w/o Restructure or Paycut

Quote:
Originally Posted by GMScud View Post
I'm glad he didn't restructure. If he did, it would mean spreading his cap numbers out over the next few seasons. If a new CBA is reached, that would mean his numbers would count against us when he won't even be on the team. No thanks. We've done enough of spreading out contracts of older players with our "restructuring."

II say we experiment with Andre Carter at full time LDE, and put Taylor where he has excelled in the past - RDE.t's not like Carter dominated from the right side last year. Of course if that happens, we'll need a damn good Will LB to play behind Taylor for run support.

In light of this decision by Vinny and the gang, I expect Shawn Springs to be gone, especially since we're in full-on negotiations with D.Hall. I also think IF Phillip Daniels is still in the teams plans even after he hits the FA market, he'll be playing for the vet minimum.
I like that idea GMScud
44ever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2009, 06:33 PM   #22
DirtyLandry
Special Teams
 
DirtyLandry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: lost in the sauce
Posts: 377
Re: Taylor to Return w/o Restructure or Paycut

People act as though it's Jason Taylor's fault that were in cap hell. I don't know of any pro bowler that would restructure his deal after one injury riddled season. Thats a ridiculous notion. Also, we gave up a 2nd and 5th round pick, let's at least give this deal a chance to pan out.
__________________
"I just went from six to midnight."
DirtyLandry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2009, 06:36 PM   #23
Ruhskins
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,378
Re: Taylor to Return w/o Restructure or Paycut

Quote:
Originally Posted by GMScud View Post
I'm glad he didn't restructure. If he did, it would mean spreading his cap numbers out over the next few seasons. If a new CBA is reached, that would mean his numbers would count against us when he won't even be on the team. No thanks. We've done enough of spreading out contracts of older players with our "restructuring."

I say we experiment with Andre Carter at full time LDE, and put Taylor where he has excelled in the past - RDE. It's not like Carter dominated from the right side last year. Of course if that happens, we'll need a damn good Will LB to play behind Taylor for run support.

In light of this decision by Vinny and the gang, I expect Shawn Springs to be gone, especially since we're in full-on negotiations with D.Hall. I also think IF Phillip Daniels is still in the teams plans even after he hits the FA market, he'll be playing for the vet minimum.
Good points GMScud, I don't like this decision at all, but it is the lesser of two evils. Let's hope Taylor sees this as an incentive to play well next season, and I just don't believe he would mail it as some people have suggested.

Has anyone seen this story anywhere but in Yahoo? Not that I don't trust them, but I just checked PFT, Redskins Insider, Adam Schefter's blog and ESPN rumors and none of them had a story about this.
__________________
R.I.P. #21
Ruhskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2009, 06:58 PM   #24
djnemo65
Playmaker
 
djnemo65's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2,836
Re: Taylor to Return w/o Restructure or Paycut

Taylor is unfortunately looking more like a Deion Sanders than a London Fletcher, in terms of being an older player who failed to live up to his past pedigree. BUT, I for one have been very impressed with Taylor's apparent cognizance of his underperformance this past season. Unlike other guys who have seemed content to not only skate by on their reputation, but have seemed to be completely oblivious to having failed to live up to expectations, Taylor sounds like he is coming back next year with something to prove.

And I kind of think he's going to have one final big season.
djnemo65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2009, 07:03 PM   #25
44ever
Registered User
 
44ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: The Fortune Teller
Posts: 2,512
Re: Taylor to Return w/o Restructure or Paycut

Quote:
Originally Posted by djnemo65 View Post
Taylor is unfortunately looking more like a Deion Sanders than a London Fletcher, in terms of being an older player who failed to live up to his past pedigree. BUT, I for one have been very impressed with Taylor's apparent cognizance of his underperformance this past season. Unlike other guys who have seemed content to not only skate by on their reputation, but have seemed to be completely oblivious to having failed to live up to expectations, Taylor sounds like he is coming back next year with something to prove.

And I kind of think he's going to have one final big season
.
My thoughts exactly dj65
44ever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2009, 07:12 PM   #26
Skinny Tee
The Starter
 
Skinny Tee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Redskins Nation
Posts: 1,715
Re: Taylor to Return w/o Restructure or Paycut

How do the Skins plan on being active in free agency with that 8 million dollar chunk locking up our cap space?

I suppose since our 2nd round draft pick won't be playing with us this season we might as well have his compensation on field this year.
__________________
Redskinsly,
_________Skinny Tee_________
Skinny Tee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2009, 07:20 PM   #27
GMScud
Swearinger
 
GMScud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 12,626
Re: Taylor to Return w/o Restructure or Paycut

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skinny Tee View Post
How do the Skins plan on being active in free agency with that 8 million dollar chunk locking up our cap space?

I suppose since our 2nd round draft pick won't be playing with us this season we might as well have his compensation on field this year.
It starts with releasing Shawn Springs, and I doubt we'll have much if any of Philip Daniels $2.2M number on our ledger either.
__________________
Tardy
GMScud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2009, 07:30 PM   #28
Hamoskinz
Special Teams
 
Hamoskinz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Samoa
Posts: 180
Re: Taylor to Return w/o Restructure or Paycut

Its great you guys are confident/hoping JT will have a great year in the B'n'G uniform. I am ticked off at what we gave up to get him and what we got instead. In between the picks we gave up and the money we gave him for the production we got, he needs to play every game like that Eagles game to see us getting any benefit from the trade.

I am hoping that with his leg being 100%, he will finally get to beat RTs on a regular basis cause i am sick of watching him getting stood up @ the line, can't push and no speed to rush the outside.

Sorry mates, I'm trying to let out some steam over this JT debacle and how we managed to give away our 2nd pick which could've addressed one of our glaring needs.
Hamoskinz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2009, 07:32 PM   #29
Nflnick11
Special Teams
 
Nflnick11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 432
Re: Taylor to Return w/o Restructure or Paycut

wow im pissed, one change and were still keeping and relying on the old vets thinking that their gonna give us a year like when they were in their 6th year or something...Taylor needs to take a pay cut or be cut!
Nflnick11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2009, 07:32 PM   #30
44ever
Registered User
 
44ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: The Fortune Teller
Posts: 2,512
Re: Taylor to Return w/o Restructure or Paycut

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skinny Tee View Post
How do the Skins plan on being active in free agency with that 8 million dollar chunk locking up our cap space?

I suppose since our 2nd round draft pick won't be playing with us this season we might as well have his compensation on field this year.
Well Skinny dont forget this news of Taylor comes just 2 days after the release of M Washington. The Redskins are expected to save in the ballpark of $4 million following the release of SLB Marcus Washington on Friday. Now we know why.

As GMScud said Springs is next. Not sure of what his cap savings is. Maybe Daniels as well.
44ever is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 2.40106 seconds with 13 queries