Randy McMichael Might Be Available

[Bbaker24]

he's going to be looking to come in as the starter...but if he is willing to sign a 1 year deal to serve as the backup then lets do it

[skinsfan_nn]

Originally Posted by Bbaker24

he's going to be looking to come in as the starter...but if he is willing to sign a 1 year deal to serve as the backup then lets do it

I doubt he's lookin at one year? He's definitely isn't looking for backup cash. McMichael can play!

Don't NEED to be wasting cash on a upper end TE. We have other areas of higher concern.

[Crat92]

Could someone please tell me why all the hu-bub about a blocking TE in this offense?

[Beemnseven]

Originally Posted by Crat92

Could someone please tell me why all the hu-bub about a blocking TE in this offense?

Goal line? Short yardage?

I see where you're coming from though -- tight ends in Saunders' offense primarily catch. I guess the feeling is, as long as Gibbs still has his hands in the offense, you'll still see some heavy-jumbo formations.

Still, there's plenty to concentrate on with defense alone.

[Aussie_Skins_Fan]

Originally Posted by Beemnseven

Goal line? Short yardage?

I see where you're coming from though -- tight ends in Saunders' offense primarily catch. I guess the feeling is, as long as Gibbs still has his hands in the offense, you'll still see some heavy-jumbo formations.

Still, there's plenty to concentrate on with defense alone.

Saunders ran alot of Stretch and Counters in KC when running tho, TE are important for those plays.

[DGreene28]

We share the name except I spell it with an E... I'm in Farmington with 50. How about yourself?

[SmootSmack]

Originally Posted by DGreene28

We share the name except I spell it with an E... I'm in Farmington with 50. How about yourself?

I figured as much. I'm in Meriden, just off 691

I just sent you a PM

[ArtMonkDrillz]

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

I figured as much. I'm in Meriden, just off 691

I just sent you a PM

Looks like that Love Boat avatar is already starting to pay off



(that's right, I have the sense of humor of a middle schooler, you wanna fight about it?)

[Rajmahal33]

McMichael is more of a razzle dazzle kind of player, whereas we need a garbage man. The one thing that he could provide for this team is that he would give JC a big target in the end zone on goal line sets. We currently don't have a tall receiver and McMichael was always great in the red zone at Miami. Still i agree that we shouldn't go after him unless its a real bargain. We need a blocker to seal the ends on those counter plays and such.

[CHIEF CHUCKING MY SPEAR]

mcmichael would be a good back up to cooley if anything ever happen to him. but it would have to be a bargain contract or hardly any signing bonus. Need to find a guard or dlineman.

[MTK]

McMichael is one of the better receiving TEs in the league, no way he's even on our radar.

[GTripp0012]

I always like TE depth. I feel like you can never have enough good TEs. I've just never liked McMichael. He's a subpar blocker, has character issues, and is even overrated at what he does well--catching the football.

Graham would be so much more enticing its not even funny.

[That Guy]

he'd immediately be the #2 here. I think he's good, but if its over 1mill per, we've got other needs to save for.

[Aussie_Skins_Fan]

I doubt he would even want to be here. If he came here, he shouldn't get great money and wouldn't get a start ahead of Cooley (Who will make the Pro Bowl this year, thats my 'lead pipe lock'). So i don't think that makes a very attractive option for him, or us.

[Pocket$ $traight]

He has killed at least 3 of my fantasy teams with his late season disappearing acts.

Let someone throw 30 million at him (hopefully the Cowboys or Niners) so we can laugh.