Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Adam Archuleta to Start

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-20-2007, 12:29 PM   #1
jsarno
Franchise Player
 
jsarno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 31 Spooner St.
Age: 50
Posts: 9,534
Re: Adam Archuleta to Start

Quote:
Originally Posted by EARTHQUAKE2689 View Post
To quote a line from that commerical "Is that funny for you?"
Commercial????
I was referring to Matt Foley, the motivational speaker...ie: Chris Farley on SNL.
__________________
Zoltan is ZESTY! - courtesy of joeredskin
jsarno is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2007, 10:57 AM   #2
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,832
Re: Adam Archuleta to Start

I'm sure "the leak" will bounce back under Lovie.

He's always been overrated and he was never a cover safety. We definitely got burned on him, not sure if it was a case of the Skins not doing their homework or if he just stunk it up for whatever reason. Either way he's gone, best of luck to him. I hope we torch him when we play Chicago.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2007, 11:52 AM   #3
airsoftking
Special Teams
 
airsoftking's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: FRANCE
Posts: 111
Re: Adam Archuleta to Start

who cares? anyway is not a redskin anywore so....
airsoftking is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2007, 08:47 AM   #4
TheMalcolmConnection
I like big (_|_)s.
 
TheMalcolmConnection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia
Age: 43
Posts: 19,264
Re: Adam Archuleta to Start

He also had a rockin' one tackle yesterday. Go Arch!
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted.
TheMalcolmConnection is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2007, 10:13 AM   #5
JoeRedskin
Contains football related knowledge
 
JoeRedskin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Second Star On The Right
Age: 62
Posts: 10,401
Re: Adam Archuleta to Start

While I have nothing personal against the guy - I thought he would be a good signing and provide us some solid backfield work, however, he struck me as a softie almost from the minute he got here. I remember one article where he said he used some touchy-feely music to get him up for a game. Now he says he can't deal with negative people. Since GW believes in tough love coaching, it is clear that Arch was not gonna fit in.

He's the guy in the office who constantly has to be told that he's doing a good job - As long as he gets positive feedback, he's a good worker. But, w/o constant coddling watch production plummet. Glad he's found someone who "appreciates" him. Maybe they can end their practices with a group hug.

He was a mistake but it was the FO's mistake not Arch's. Throw that much money at me and I'll be miserable for a year. Got no hate for the guy - just think he's a bit of a cry-baby.
__________________
Strap it up, hold onto the ball, and let’s go.
JoeRedskin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2007, 06:05 PM   #6
DirteePosse
Camp Scrub
 
DirteePosse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Honolulu, HI
Posts: 33
Re: Adam Archuleta to Start

I'm not a fan of Archuleta's and wasn't thrilled when he signed with the Skins. He actually sinked lower in my book for underperforming. I'm glad he's in Chicago and off of the Skins (it should've been a package deal with Jimoh).
DirteePosse is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 1.81306 seconds with 10 queries