![]() |
|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
\m/
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,832
|
Re: OG and OC are bigger needs than OT
I would pretty much bet the farm that Vinny wouldn't take a WR at #13. Let's call it the Matt Millen rule, nobody wants to go down that path.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Northern,Va.
Posts: 2,706
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Doylestown, PA
Posts: 520
|
Re: OG and OC are bigger needs than OT
This thread assumes that Vinny will draft for a position of need.
Cerratto has consistently stated that he always drafts for Best Player Available. Most of the media who follows this team;most of the fans would say we need to draft for the OL and DL. Some of us have been saying it for years and years. Yet, the team under Snyder has gone for anything BUT draft for the trenches. I see nothing that makes me think that Vinny will suddenly change his draft strategy this season. Only one draft pick from last season got significant playing time - Chris Horton. One out of ten choices. Vinny will pick poorly for the wrong positions. I'd like to see us draft a OT. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |||||
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,323
|
Re: OG and OC are bigger needs than OT
Quote:
While I wouldn't quite say that Rabach is done, i think that he struggles against some of the bigger NT/DT. I sadly agree about Randy. I think our line could use upgrades. I look at the line issues from this vantage point: Imagine that the Redskins can only upgrade 1 offensive line postion which postion would you pick? My answer is Center. Nothing against Rabach. But, IMO the single greatest benefit to the overall line would happen if our Center could match up 1-1 with the likes of a NT/DT like Ratliff. When/if the center can hold their own the rest of the line improves automatically. Quote:
I think Rinehart's playing time was a victim of Buges loyalty to his veterans. Rinehart is one of our few young lineman and IMO they should've put him in when Thomas was struggling and let him play. Rinehart has 'upside' we can watch him improve instead of wishing that our vets return to form while we watching their play decline. Quote:
then beat out Jansen for the RT spot during training camp. -If Buges still thinks that Jansen can play and all signs point to Heyer being better and not mention younger then Jansen, doesn't that mean that Heyer is at least a decent OT? Quote:
Quote:
My lineup if the Redskins only make 1 upgrade: LT Samuels LG Rinehart C-*Rookie* RG-Rinehart RT- Heyer WalterFootball.com: 2009 NFL Draft: Center Rankings Alex Mack, California Height: 6-5. Weight: 316. Projected 40 Time: 5.13. Projected Round (2009): 1. Max Unger, Oregon Height: 6-5. Weight: 300. Projected 40 Time: 5.20. Projected Round (2009): 1-2. Jonathan Luigs, Arkansas Height: 6-4. Weight: 314. Projected 40 Time: 5.21. Projected Round (2009): 2. NFL Draft Scout Rankings has them ranked different and has none of them going in the 1st so we could even trade down from the 13th pick take another player and still land one of these guys in the 2nd round. NFL Draft Scout Rankings, From Prep to Pro Coverage for Pros by Pros - Powered by the Sports Xchange ![]() |
|||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: AFGHANISTAN
Posts: 335
|
Re: OG and OC are bigger needs than OT
The answer you guys are looking for is Mr. Crabtree!
__________________
Don't tase me bro!!!! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: OG and OC are bigger needs than OT
Even though there might be better options than Mack at 13, I'll say this: a line with him in the middle of Kendall and Rinehart/Thomas would be strong even with Jon Jansen at RT.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Doylestown, PA
Posts: 520
|
Re: OG and OC are bigger needs than OT
We are one of the only teams that consistently rejects OL and DL choices in the draft. Our record under Snyder reflects that bias.
Until we use our best draft choices for the OL and DL, we will never get better than we are. Jason Campbell needs pass protection. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,323
|
Re: OG and OC are bigger needs than OT
Quote:
We could likely trade down and still get him, the earliest i've seen him go in a mock is to the Steelers @ 30. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kill Devil Hills, N.C.
Posts: 7,570
|
Re: OG and OC are bigger needs than OT
I agree 100% GTripp. I wouldn't mind trading down, but I would really like this guy on our team.
__________________
Defense wins championships. Bring it! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
|
Re: OG and OC are bigger needs than OT
Talk about semantics. Center a bigger need than guard. Guard a bigger need than center. Tackle a bigger need than guard or center. For the oldest, smallest and slowest line in the division and arguably one of the worst in the league period this debate wins the inane award.
... the line needs to be replaced within a year or two w/ the exception of Samuels (who may just need to switch to RT). Where/how we start the replacement process is probably best decided as a matter of pragmatism. If Jansen can be effective on the interior then he needs to make the switch since we're stuck w/ him. Draft a franchise tackle and decide whether he'll play on the left (moving Samuels to RT) or plug the rook into RT. We need franchise players on the line. If the FO 1) allows Jansen or Heyer to start at either tackle position and/or 2) stupidly settles for 2nd tier/3rd tier line talent through this replacement process this team will not even go 8-8 in each the next few seasons.
__________________
24-34 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 59
|
Re: OG and OC are bigger needs than OT
I agree with Goat.
In my dream scenario, we are able to trade down in the 20's and pick up Duke Robinson and get a 2nd round pick. Then we pick up Alex Mack or Luigs with that selection. In the third, we pick up Ziggy Hood to play DT. In the 5th, we pick up Alex Boone to eventually take over at RT. No pretty picks in this draft. Just bring on the big uglies.
__________________
Build this team through the draft, please! Starting with both lines. A dynasty is not a bad thing to shoot for! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: OG and OC are bigger needs than OT
Quote:
I'm really hoping we can trade down and get Robinson and Luigs as well.
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Montgomery County, Md
Age: 49
Posts: 20
|
Re: OG and OC are bigger needs than OT
We should either take OT with our 1st round pick, then follow that up with DT, DE, and RB.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 26
|
Re: OG and OC are bigger needs than OT
i think deal with the dline in FA and deal with the oline in the draft. the draft is really deep this year with offensive linemen. and theres a lot of FA d linemen out there that are still young that we possibly could sign.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|