Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


OG and OC are bigger needs than OT

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-09-2009, 04:07 PM   #1
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,832
Re: OG and OC are bigger needs than OT

I would pretty much bet the farm that Vinny wouldn't take a WR at #13. Let's call it the Matt Millen rule, nobody wants to go down that path.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2009, 08:12 PM   #2
budw38
Playmaker
 
budw38's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Northern,Va.
Posts: 2,706
Wink Re: OG and OC are bigger needs than OT

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72 View Post
I would pretty much bet the farm that Vinny wouldn't take a WR at #13. Let's call it the Matt Millen rule, nobody wants to go down that path.
So , unless Matt Millen gets hired as our GM , we will not draft P. Harvin , WR , Florida Gators
budw38 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2009, 08:47 PM   #3
A10sROCK
Impact Rookie
 
A10sROCK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Doylestown, PA
Posts: 520
Re: OG and OC are bigger needs than OT

This thread assumes that Vinny will draft for a position of need.

Cerratto has consistently stated that he always drafts for Best Player Available. Most of the media who follows this team;most of the fans would say we need to draft for the OL and DL. Some of us have been saying it for years and years.

Yet, the team under Snyder has gone for anything BUT draft for the trenches. I see nothing that makes me think that Vinny will suddenly change his draft strategy this season.

Only one draft pick from last season got significant playing time - Chris Horton. One out of ten choices.

Vinny will pick poorly for the wrong positions. I'd like to see us draft a OT.
A10sROCK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2009, 04:11 PM   #4
30gut
Playmaker
 
30gut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,323
Re: OG and OC are bigger needs than OT

Quote:
Unfortunately, we need some help at all three Interior line positions. Pete Kendall was arguably our best lineman this year, but he is a free agent. Rabach is DONE. he's finished as a starter. Randy Thomas is done too, but unlike Rabach, he has a ridiculous cap figure.
I agree 100% about Kendall playing well, Terrel Davis even mentioned him as a pro-bowl snub AND Pete says that he wants to return.

While I wouldn't quite say that Rabach is done, i think that he struggles against some of the bigger NT/DT.
I sadly agree about Randy.
I think our line could use upgrades.

I look at the line issues from this vantage point: Imagine that the Redskins can only upgrade 1 offensive line postion which postion would you pick?

My answer is Center.

Nothing against Rabach. But, IMO the single greatest benefit to the overall line would happen if our Center could match up 1-1 with the likes of a NT/DT like Ratliff. When/if the center can hold their own the rest of the line improves automatically.

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigHairedAristocrat View Post
....when you look back to the problems on our line this year, more often than ont, Campbell was getting pressured in the middle.
I think that Kendall will still be effective at 1 Guard spot and i gotta believe that Rinehart will be at least as good as Thomas.(especially since Fabini filled in for Randy last year, after the whole Wade fiasco) Buges and the media raved about Rhino all training camp and preseason yet the kid didn't see a snap of game time.
I think Rinehart's playing time was a victim of Buges loyalty to his veterans. Rinehart is one of our few young lineman and IMO they should've put him in when Thomas was struggling and let him play. Rinehart has 'upside' we can watch him improve instead of wishing that our vets return to form while we watching their play decline.

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigHairedAristocrat View Post
I know the chances of Heyer developing into a stud RT are slim to none.
I don't know about this, Heyer played well last year as a rookie undrafted free agent inplace of an injured Jansen. Heyer seemed to improve each week
then beat out Jansen for the RT spot during training camp.
-If Buges still thinks that Jansen can play and all signs point to Heyer being better and not mention younger then Jansen, doesn't that mean that Heyer is at least a decent OT?

Quote:
OT is a need, for sure, but we can get by with Samuels on one side and Jansen/Heyer on the other for another year if we have an upgraded interior line.. .....
Samuels when healthy is out best lineman. But it wouldn't hurt to have a young LT waiting in the wings.



Quote:
Having a solid interior line is a MUST
And it starts with center.

My lineup if the Redskins only make 1 upgrade:
LT Samuels LG Rinehart C-*Rookie* RG-Rinehart RT- Heyer

WalterFootball.com: 2009 NFL Draft: Center Rankings

Alex Mack, California
Height: 6-5. Weight: 316.
Projected 40 Time: 5.13.
Projected Round (2009): 1.

Max Unger, Oregon
Height: 6-5. Weight: 300.
Projected 40 Time: 5.20.
Projected Round (2009): 1-2.

Jonathan Luigs, Arkansas
Height: 6-4. Weight: 314.
Projected 40 Time: 5.21.
Projected Round (2009): 2.

NFL Draft Scout Rankings has them ranked different and has none of them going in the 1st so we could even trade down from the 13th pick take another player and still land one of these guys in the 2nd round.

NFL Draft Scout Rankings, From Prep to Pro Coverage for Pros by Pros - Powered by the Sports Xchange

30gut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2009, 11:29 AM   #5
LandrySlice
Special Teams
 
LandrySlice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: AFGHANISTAN
Posts: 335
Re: OG and OC are bigger needs than OT

The answer you guys are looking for is Mr. Crabtree!
__________________
Don't tase me bro!!!!
LandrySlice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2009, 12:14 PM   #6
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
Re: OG and OC are bigger needs than OT

Even though there might be better options than Mack at 13, I'll say this: a line with him in the middle of Kendall and Rinehart/Thomas would be strong even with Jon Jansen at RT.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2009, 12:59 PM   #7
A10sROCK
Impact Rookie
 
A10sROCK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Doylestown, PA
Posts: 520
Re: OG and OC are bigger needs than OT

We are one of the only teams that consistently rejects OL and DL choices in the draft. Our record under Snyder reflects that bias.

Until we use our best draft choices for the OL and DL, we will never get better than we are. Jason Campbell needs pass protection.
A10sROCK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2009, 01:09 PM   #8
30gut
Playmaker
 
30gut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,323
Re: OG and OC are bigger needs than OT

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
Even though there might be better options than Mack at 13, I'll say this: a line with him in the middle of Kendall and Rinehart/Thomas would be strong even with Jon Jansen at RT.
Most of the draft sites have him(Mack) going way lower then 13.
We could likely trade down and still get him, the earliest i've seen him go in a mock is to the Steelers @ 30.
30gut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2009, 06:39 PM   #9
53Fan
Franchise Player
 
53Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kill Devil Hills, N.C.
Posts: 7,570
Re: OG and OC are bigger needs than OT

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
Even though there might be better options than Mack at 13, I'll say this: a line with him in the middle of Kendall and Rinehart/Thomas would be strong even with Jon Jansen at RT.
I agree 100% GTripp. I wouldn't mind trading down, but I would really like this guy on our team.
__________________
Defense wins championships. Bring it!
53Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2009, 06:37 PM   #10
The Goat
Pro Bowl
 
The Goat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
Re: OG and OC are bigger needs than OT

Talk about semantics. Center a bigger need than guard. Guard a bigger need than center. Tackle a bigger need than guard or center. For the oldest, smallest and slowest line in the division and arguably one of the worst in the league period this debate wins the inane award.

... the line needs to be replaced within a year or two w/ the exception of Samuels (who may just need to switch to RT). Where/how we start the replacement process is probably best decided as a matter of pragmatism. If Jansen can be effective on the interior then he needs to make the switch since we're stuck w/ him. Draft a franchise tackle and decide whether he'll play on the left (moving Samuels to RT) or plug the rook into RT. We need franchise players on the line. If the FO 1) allows Jansen or Heyer to start at either tackle position and/or 2) stupidly settles for 2nd tier/3rd tier line talent through this replacement process this team will not even go 8-8 in each the next few seasons.
__________________
24-34
The Goat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2009, 08:11 PM   #11
MeanEvilSkin
Camp Scrub
 
MeanEvilSkin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 59
Re: OG and OC are bigger needs than OT

I agree with Goat.

In my dream scenario, we are able to trade down in the 20's and pick up Duke Robinson and get a 2nd round pick. Then we pick up Alex Mack or Luigs with that selection. In the third, we pick up Ziggy Hood to play DT. In the 5th, we pick up Alex Boone to eventually take over at RT.

No pretty picks in this draft. Just bring on the big uglies.
__________________
Build this team through the draft, please! Starting with both lines. A dynasty is not a bad thing to shoot for!
MeanEvilSkin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2009, 01:13 PM   #12
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: OG and OC are bigger needs than OT

Quote:
Originally Posted by MeanEvilSkin View Post
I agree with Goat.

In my dream scenario, we are able to trade down in the 20's and pick up Duke Robinson and get a 2nd round pick. Then we pick up Alex Mack or Luigs with that selection. In the third, we pick up Ziggy Hood to play DT. In the 5th, we pick up Alex Boone to eventually take over at RT.

No pretty picks in this draft. Just bring on the big uglies.
Get of out of my dreams (but don't get into my car)

I'm really hoping we can trade down and get Robinson and Luigs as well.
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2009, 08:41 PM   #13
#21Taylor4Ever
Camp Scrub
 
#21Taylor4Ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Montgomery County, Md
Age: 49
Posts: 20
Re: OG and OC are bigger needs than OT

We should either take OT with our 1st round pick, then follow that up with DT, DE, and RB.
#21Taylor4Ever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2009, 05:10 PM   #14
markymark
Camp Scrub
 
markymark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 26
Re: OG and OC are bigger needs than OT

i think deal with the dline in FA and deal with the oline in the draft. the draft is really deep this year with offensive linemen. and theres a lot of FA d linemen out there that are still young that we possibly could sign.
markymark is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:25 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 2.61104 seconds with 10 queries