|
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
12-14-2007, 10:48 AM
|
#1 |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: St. Louis, MO
Age: 69
Posts: 868
|
Re: Jon Jansen: Starter Next Year?
This discussion is insane. No one in his right mind would bench Jansen. It would be crazy to trade Chris Samuels in his prime. There are very few left tackles better than Chris Samuels. Now this thread did bring up a priority for the off-season and that is to draft offensive line depth. Replacing the starters, to me, is not a priority.
__________________
"HAIL TO THE SKINS" |
|
|
|
12-14-2007, 05:46 PM
|
#2 |
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 8,317
|
Re: Jon Jansen: Starter Next Year?
Jansen is far and away better than Heyer and Wade, but he's aging and he wasn't the Jon Jansen I knew from 1999-2003. I think Jansen should stay, but I wouldn't mind it if we drafted a new olineman in the 1st or 2nd round.
|
|
|
|
|
12-14-2007, 05:51 PM
|
#3 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,592
|
Re: Jon Jansen: Starter Next Year?
Our healthy starting O line is great.
They will all start next year. Skins should draft some young guys to mold next year. If someone goes down next year, we have Heyer to step in, amongst others. And late in the year the newly drafted guys will be ready to step in if need be. |
|
|
|
|
12-15-2007, 10:31 AM
|
#4 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,620
|
Re: Jon Jansen: Starter Next Year?
wade and heyer are in NO way better than jansen (who'll start next year if possible). we should definitely draft more OL (they're pretty old as is right now). samuels is way better than jansen, even if he some boneheaded things sometimes.
wade and heyer are decent backups. |
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
