Stick a fork in em', they are done!

[CultBrennan59]

Smoot, with all due respect, I'm not asking you to name the specific people you get your info from, so therefore I'm not naming my source. All ill say is that this person also told me we were getting Robert back around the time he had just won his Heismann (which I had shared on this site). This person is a neighbor of mine. This person works in the FO. And has appeared on a TV camera before.

[Ruhskins]

Originally Posted by CultBrennan59

Smoot, with all due respect, I'm not asking you to name the specific people you get your info from, so therefore I'm not naming my source. All ill say is that this person also told me we were getting Robert back around the time he had just won his Heismann (which I had shared on this site). This person is a neighbor of mine. This person works in the FO. And has appeared on a TV camera before.

What's so hard about citing this as your source?

[CultBrennan59]

Originally Posted by Ruhskins

What's so hard about citing this as your source?

Because we all know the next questions and posts to follow after I say that...

[Lotus]

Originally Posted by CultBrennan59

Because we all know the next questions and posts to follow after I say that...

That is not a good answer to Ruhskin's reasonable question. Citing sources is the honest and respectful thing to do and "what posts may follow" doesn't change this.

[CultBrennan59]

Originally Posted by Lotus

That is not a good answer to Ruhskin's reasonable question. Citing sources is the honest and respectful thing to do and "what posts may follow" doesn't change this.

Where are you to do this to smoot? Why do you care? A lot of sources talk on anonymity. I gave a reasonable enough citing earlier.

We have moved on. I suggest you do to.

[Lotus]

Originally Posted by CultBrennan59

Where are you to do this to smoot? Why do you care? A lot of sources talk on anonymity. I gave a reasonable enough citing earlier.

We have moved on. I suggest you do to.

No, you gave no citing earlier. And you are famous in this parts for not offering attribution. Again, it is simply honest and respectful to cite sources.

[SmootSmack]

Originally Posted by Lotus

No, you gave no citing earlier. And you are famous in this parts for not offering attribution. Again, it is simply honest and respectful to cite sources.

It's ok Lotus. Let's move on

[CultBrennan59]

Originally Posted by Lotus

No, you gave no citing earlier. And you are famous in this parts for not offering attribution. Again, it is simply honest and respectful to cite sources.

http://www.thewarpath.net/redskins-l...ml#post1031283

[SmootSmack]

Originally Posted by CultBrennan59

Smoot, with all due respect, I'm not asking you to name the specific people you get your info from, so therefore I'm not naming my source. All ill say is that this person also told me we were getting Robert back around the time he had just won his Heismann (which I had shared on this site). This person is a neighbor of mine. This person works in the FO. And has appeared on a TV camera before.

Your neighbor gave you misleading info.

[CultBrennan59]

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

Your neighbor gave you misleading info.

Couple of things

1) I was told this almost a year ago. I'm paraphrasing here. The jist of the story I got is trestman could have been a coach for us.

2) how do you know your source is giving you misleading info? I do know organizations will "leak" out info purposely to mislead parts of the media.

3) give us your take then (I'm not asking for your source)

[SmootSmack]

Originally Posted by CultBrennan59

Couple of things

1) I was told this almost a year ago. I'm paraphrasing here. The jist of the story I got is trestman could have been a coach for us.

2) how do you know your source is giving you misleading info? I do know organizations will "leak" out info purposely to mislead parts of the media.

3) give us your take then (I'm not asking for your source)

Don't worry about it. Moving on