Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Fantasy Football Forums > Fantasy Football

Fantasy Football Discuss all fantasy football related matters here


Fantasy Football 2013 Thread

Fantasy Football


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-03-2013, 06:38 PM   #1
TheMalcolmConnection
I like big (_|_)s.
 
TheMalcolmConnection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia
Age: 43
Posts: 19,264
Re: Fantasy Football 2013 Thread

I know you're a VT fan too, but this is whats killing me about being a fan of both teams: PUT AN ENTIRE FOOTBALL GAME TOGETHER. When you do that, you'll win consistently. I think Denver would have beaten us regardless of play-calling, but the rest of the games, I'd say you could look at a handful of plays and say, "That's where it was lost."

Sure, football is that type of game, but just MEDIOCRE play in all facets of the game would have equaled at least 2 more wins.
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted.
TheMalcolmConnection is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2013, 06:54 PM   #2
mooby
Hug Anne Spyder
 
mooby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,577
Re: Fantasy Football 2013 Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMalcolmConnection View Post
I know you're a VT fan too, but this is whats killing me about being a fan of both teams: PUT AN ENTIRE FOOTBALL GAME TOGETHER. When you do that, you'll win consistently. I think Denver would have beaten us regardless of play-calling, but the rest of the games, I'd say you could look at a handful of plays and say, "That's where it was lost."

Sure, football is that type of game, but just MEDIOCRE play in all facets of the game would have equaled at least 2 more wins.
Yeah but it's always too late for what if's. VT is never gonna go anywhere with Logan Thomas, but he's the starter and they don't have any better alternatives. Same with the Redskins. This team is a direct result of what we had to work with given our cap situation, and it reflects. Realistically we could be looking major moves this offseason.

Still no first round pick, but we will be getting cap room back, and we've got holes in the secondary and o-line that need to be improved. My whole thing is we've got guys starting that might not have a job anywhere else. On o-line only TW's job is secure. All 4 secondary spots are open for debate too. Long story short, consistency starts with the players, and our players are still not that good.
mooby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2013, 07:42 PM   #3
Chico23231
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
Chico23231's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 35,022
Re: Fantasy Football 2013 Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMalcolmConnection View Post
I know you're a VT fan too, but this is whats killing me about being a fan of both teams: PUT AN ENTIRE FOOTBALL GAME TOGETHER. When you do that, you'll win consistently. I think Denver would have beaten us regardless of play-calling, but the rest of the games, I'd say you could look at a handful of plays and say, "That's where it was lost."

Sure, football is that type of game, but just MEDIOCRE play in all facets of the game would have equaled at least 2 more wins.
completely agree. Being a Tech and Skins fan, consistency has been a problem. Plays left on the field haunt both.Turnovers have killed the Hookies the last 2 games. Guy I work with broke a remote last weekend when Logan threw the int in the endzone
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler

He Gets Us
Chico23231 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 2.81233 seconds with 11 queries