Redskins agree to deal with Jason Hatcher

[Lotus]

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

That's what they've been thinking

With who at nose? Hatcher? Geathers? Nield? Baker?

[artmonkforhallofamein07]

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

That's what they've been thinking

Are deals with Spencer and Clark still a possibility? Heard any thing other than a couple of things tweeted out.

Spencer is another key and someone who would be awesome to pair with Kerrigan. Rak and Hatcher on the right and Kerrigan and Spencer on the left would be a nice rush package.

[artmonkforhallofamein07]

Originally Posted by Bucket

This is the best signing we've had since Fletcher.

The guy had more sacks against NFCE opponents then our WHOLE DEFENSIVE LINE had all season last year. A lot of players have hit their prime in their 30's and same can be expected of JH. It's 4 years, not 8 years.

Boom.

Maybe our front seven can be the new legion of doom.

[skinsfan69]

I highly doubt Allen has a lot of guaranteed money tied up in Hatcher. This is a two year rental to help get an interior pass rush we've been severely lacking from our interior linemen. He makes Kerrigan and Rak's job easier. Not sure why anyone is bitching here. Who gives a damn that he's 31. It looks like he's still got some gas in the tank.

[Skins4L]

Im think Hatcher will play RE. Barry in the plug. Front eight got better with this one fellas..

[tc2deuce]

Hatcher also does not have a lot of wear and tear bc it took him a while to get to the top of the depth chart in Dallas...food for thought

[Ruhskins]

[skins89moss]

Originally Posted by redskins5044

We dont sign anyone people complain......we sign someone people complain...yeah is over 30, but so is Demarcus Ware and he got 30 million with 20 guaranteed and has been injured his last few years. Hatcher has played in the 4-3 and 3-4, plus we play a lot of nickel with 4 down linemen. Put him on the same side as Rak and bring the pressure, who knows if it will work out with him or not, but I am alright with the signing.

Amen brother

[skins89moss]

I just remember last season against Hatcher he destroyed our o-line by himself. He will up grade our interior d-line pass rush and we weaken our opponents defense. I hope he plays better then Bowen played.

[Skins4L]

Originally Posted by Ruhskins

Cant wait to get home and add a 91ovr Hatcher to my all skins ultimate team.. might have to sit deacon jones to get em in there tho

[skinsfan69]

31 does not mean a player can not get the job done. As long as they take care of themselves and there's not a lot of guaranteed money then I'm fine with it. We're going to probably have a rotation at the d-line anyway.

[GTripp0012]

My number one concern with this contract is that it goes year to year. I don't mind paying a lot for good older players -- in fact I wanted to go after Boldin before SF re-signed him -- but you don't want to get locked in with an older player. When it goes, it's gone.

[KI Skins Fan]

Originally Posted by GTripp0012

My number one concern with this contract is that it goes year to year. I don't mind paying a lot for good older players -- in fact I wanted to go after Boldin before SF re-signed him -- but you don't want to get locked in with an older player. When it goes, it's gone.

I haven't seen any details on the contract. Could you expand on your year-to-year comment? I don't understand what you mean by that. Is there a team/player/mutual option or something? Thanks in advance.

[NC_Skins]

Originally Posted by KI Skins Fan

I haven't seen any details on the contract. Could you expand on your year-to-year comment? I don't understand what you mean by that. Is there a team/player/mutual option or something? Thanks in advance.

He means you want to be able to cut them at the end of the year (if need) without any consequences (dead money) being stuck to you because you signed him to a long term deal with a huge signing bonus/guaranteed money. Think in terms of Revis contract with TB. He had no signing bonus or guaranteed money. Simply pay him year by year, and can cut at anytime.

[GTripp0012]

Originally Posted by NC_Skins

He means you want to be able to cut them at the end of the year (if need) without any consequences (dead money) being stuck to you because you signed him to a long term deal with a huge signing bonus/guaranteed money. Think in terms of Revis contract with TB. He had no signing bonus or guaranteed money. Simply pay him year by year, and can cut at anytime.

Exactly. Thanks.