![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,141
|
Re: Redskins Sign DeSean Jackson
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,766
|
Re: Redskins Sign DeSean Jackson
Quote:
__________________
"Fire Up That Diesel!" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,141
|
Re: Redskins Sign DeSean Jackson
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 58
Posts: 21,702
|
Re: Redskins Sign DeSean Jackson
Quote:
that said, I went and looked up and found this highlight clip from 2012: watch that, and see how many times the first guy takes him down, or he goes down "easily", most catches he's open, but that's because he's not drawing major coverage. Even the two you cited St Louis is the first one on the clip, he nearly dropped the ball and the lone defender on him, no over the top safety help, caught up to him and tripped him up The Browns play(1:38-1:44) was probably the best on that whole video, still all the defense went for the ball, even tripped over themselves, had one been behind him, he would have been tagged down. Watch the play at 1 minute, and instead of turning up field he goes out of bounds. 0:34 is kinda the same but much much more difficult. Could've been a real wow, but wasn't Finally, I cite:0:27, 1:09, 1:16,1:23, 1:30, 1:34 he often crumples at first contact, and in this highlight reel I didn't see one play where he broke something out of nothing. Look, he's a guy, he's not a scrub like DT, or unable to stay healthy like MK. I wish he had trade value, but not this draft season, and not next year when he's a UFA. Again, maybe it's worth holding onto him to get a compensatory pick next year. But that's all he is to me, a 2016 compensatory 5th or 6th round pick. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |||
|
The Starter
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,141
|
Re: Redskins Sign DeSean Jackson
Quote:
Quote:
Heck, we each have different opinions, and mine is that he's a great #3, a solid #2 when healthy, and deserves a roster spot. Yours is different, and you're entitled to that. But I really can't understand why you would cut the guy now(I know, you've already explained it, but it still doesn't make sense). Even weirder, why would you have cut the guy before last season? You would've given a WR just two seasons to prove himself? That's just...well...I mean...whatever. Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|