Quote:
Originally Posted by Lotus
CRed, with all respect, dominant culture folks simply took land from Indians, killed them off by the handfuls, and then destroyed their remaining cultures, leaving many of their descendents to eke out a bare existence on reservation lands that often are so bad, no one else wants them.
But if only 24% of Indians oppose the vanity of a sports team nickname because they consider it offensive, the name should stay?
I agree with you that there will always be naysayers. But for me, given historical and current situations, the percentage of opposition needs to be much lower than the 24% you propose for change.
|
and with similar respect, if 76% of any group have found the path towards moving forward doesn't include taking insult in a term, then I think that the general population, and private businesses, should move forward too. If the Redskins actively perpetrated actions against native americans, then that would also be different, but I believe many substantial polls (older I know) show that the name is not used as an opportunity to reinforce a societal denigration of an entire class of people, and instead reflects values of that class that are inspiring - bravery, courage, strength, pride.
I am willing to go out on a limb that if you polled older white americans you would find 20% that would actively want to go back to days where segregation existed( although I have no polls to prove it). But that doesn't make that 20% valid, because the larger white society has moved forward. I know that's a lousy analogy, but it's the best I could do here at work with a headache!
06-10-2014, 02:41 PM
Hybrid Mode
