![]() |
![]() |
#106 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,323
|
Re: New Look Defense
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...e-nose-tackle/
Not sure if this is how they really feel or pre-draft misinformation. I think this defense takes a step in the wrong direction without finding replacements or upgrades. |
![]() |
![]() |
Advertisements |
![]() |
#107 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,323
|
Re: New Look Defense
wrong image
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#108 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,620
|
Re: New Look Defense
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#109 | |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Pa
Posts: 697
|
Re: New Look Defense
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#110 |
The Starter
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Bethesda, MD
Posts: 1,074
|
Re: New Look Defense
They are trying to get more picks in a super deep defensive line draft.
__________________
Bruce Allen “We’re winning off the field,” Redskins #2 In Revenue Per Year! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#111 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,323
|
Re: New Look Defense
Quote:
I would like it better if our FA moves left us in position to take the BPA. But it seems like our FA moves are suggesting a DL selection at 21 in this draft it will probably work out that BPA is a DL. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#112 | ||
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,323
|
Re: New Look Defense
Be still my heart....
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#113 | |
Warpath Hall of Fame
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 35,037
|
Re: New Look Defense
Quote:
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler He Gets Us |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#114 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 3,765
|
Re: New Look Defense
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#115 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,620
|
Re: New Look Defense
hatcher and goldson were released because of their contracts, if they're cheap enough, of course they'd want them back. it's just whether they can agree on a price point or not.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#116 |
The Starter
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,300
|
Re: New Look Defense
The most interesting nugget in this is that Murphy will be working with the DL and converting to end:
Ryan Kerrigan says Washington Redskins hungrier after 2015 success - Washington Redskins Blog- ESPN
__________________
I'm tired of these monkey fighting snakes on this Monday to Friday plane! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#117 | |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Jacksonville, Forida
Posts: 6,412
|
Re: New Look Defense
Quote:
__________________
I'm a big Caitlin Clark fan! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#118 |
Warpath Hall of Fame
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 35,037
|
Re: New Look Defense
It's his last chance, so he needs to deliver.
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler He Gets Us |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#119 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,323
|
Re: New Look Defense
Do they mean he's attempting to move to a 5-tech DE as in 34 Base D? Or do they mean a DE in a 4 man line that we use upwards of 65% of the time?
Saying a 34 OLB is moving to DE is vague. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#120 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,620
|
Re: New Look Defense
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|